Cargando…

Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture and defects observed in ProTaper Next files discarded after a normal clinical use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 571 ProTaper Next rotary instruments were collected after clinical use from the clinic of endodontics over 12 months. The length of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-Pazos, Gema, Martín-Biedma, Benjamín, Varela-Patiño, Purificación, Ruíz-Piñón, Manuel, Castelo-Baz, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607226
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54910
_version_ 1783383606848126976
author Fernández-Pazos, Gema
Martín-Biedma, Benjamín
Varela-Patiño, Purificación
Ruíz-Piñón, Manuel
Castelo-Baz, Pablo
author_facet Fernández-Pazos, Gema
Martín-Biedma, Benjamín
Varela-Patiño, Purificación
Ruíz-Piñón, Manuel
Castelo-Baz, Pablo
author_sort Fernández-Pazos, Gema
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture and defects observed in ProTaper Next files discarded after a normal clinical use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 571 ProTaper Next rotary instruments were collected after clinical use from the clinic of endodontics over 12 months. The length of the files was measured using a digital caliper to determine any fracture, later all the files were evaluated under a stereomicroscope to observe defects such as unwinding, curving or fracture. The data obtained were analyzed using a chi-square and z test. RESULTS: 13.83% of the discarded files showed defects, the most frequent defect was fracture (7.53%). The highest rate of fracture was observed in the X1 (17.04) files (19.87%). The presence of deformations without fracture was also more frequent in the 17.04 file (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the relatively high incidence of deformation of smaller files, these instruments should be considered as a single use. It is important not to exceed the maximum uses recommended by the manufacturer to reduce the risk of cyclic fatigue, the main cause of fracture of the files (79.07%). It is also important to observe each file after use to discard small defects or fractures. Key words:Clinical use, deformation, fracture, M-Wire, ProTaper Next.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63113942019-01-03 Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use Fernández-Pazos, Gema Martín-Biedma, Benjamín Varela-Patiño, Purificación Ruíz-Piñón, Manuel Castelo-Baz, Pablo J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture and defects observed in ProTaper Next files discarded after a normal clinical use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 571 ProTaper Next rotary instruments were collected after clinical use from the clinic of endodontics over 12 months. The length of the files was measured using a digital caliper to determine any fracture, later all the files were evaluated under a stereomicroscope to observe defects such as unwinding, curving or fracture. The data obtained were analyzed using a chi-square and z test. RESULTS: 13.83% of the discarded files showed defects, the most frequent defect was fracture (7.53%). The highest rate of fracture was observed in the X1 (17.04) files (19.87%). The presence of deformations without fracture was also more frequent in the 17.04 file (11.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the relatively high incidence of deformation of smaller files, these instruments should be considered as a single use. It is important not to exceed the maximum uses recommended by the manufacturer to reduce the risk of cyclic fatigue, the main cause of fracture of the files (79.07%). It is also important to observe each file after use to discard small defects or fractures. Key words:Clinical use, deformation, fracture, M-Wire, ProTaper Next. Medicina Oral S.L. 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6311394/ /pubmed/30607226 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54910 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fernández-Pazos, Gema
Martín-Biedma, Benjamín
Varela-Patiño, Purificación
Ruíz-Piñón, Manuel
Castelo-Baz, Pablo
Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title_full Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title_fullStr Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title_full_unstemmed Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title_short Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use
title_sort fracture and deformation of protaper next instruments after clinical use
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607226
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.54910
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezpazosgema fractureanddeformationofprotapernextinstrumentsafterclinicaluse
AT martinbiedmabenjamin fractureanddeformationofprotapernextinstrumentsafterclinicaluse
AT varelapatinopurificacion fractureanddeformationofprotapernextinstrumentsafterclinicaluse
AT ruizpinonmanuel fractureanddeformationofprotapernextinstrumentsafterclinicaluse
AT castelobazpablo fractureanddeformationofprotapernextinstrumentsafterclinicaluse