Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) offers a two-stage, often insufficient or so-called variable model of cutaneous melanoma treatment. This model starts with primary excision and an initial operational safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a re-excision with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tchernev, Georgi, Temelkova, Ivanka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.511
_version_ 1783383617026654208
author Tchernev, Georgi
Temelkova, Ivanka
author_facet Tchernev, Georgi
Temelkova, Ivanka
author_sort Tchernev, Georgi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) offers a two-stage, often insufficient or so-called variable model of cutaneous melanoma treatment. This model starts with primary excision and an initial operational safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a re-excision with an additional field of operational security, determined by histologically established tumor thickness (with or without removal of SLN). We present a brand new method of melanoma surgery, the so-called One Step melanoma surgery (OSMS), in which cutaneous melanomas (regardless of their thickness) could be removed by single surgical intervention. CASE REPORT: We describe a case of a patient with cutaneous melanoma, with postoperatively established Breslow’s tumor thickness of 6 mm, operated on the AJCC model within two surgical sessions. The usual primary excision was performed with a surgical safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a secondary excision with an additional surgical security field of 1.2 cm in all directions (due to the patient’s wish for the optimal cosmetic result, agreed and approved by the dermatosurgeon performing the manipulation). CONCLUSION: The two-stage method for the treatment of melanomas is often insufficient due to: 1) the inability (in this case) secondary excision in the face area to be conducted with an additional recommended operational security field of 1.5 cm in all directions; and 2) the patient’s wish for a better cosmetic result, which should be achieved with less surgical security field, resulting in a compromise solution for re-excision with an additional surgical field of 1.2 cm in all directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63114802019-01-03 Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery! Tchernev, Georgi Temelkova, Ivanka Open Access Maced J Med Sci Case Report BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) offers a two-stage, often insufficient or so-called variable model of cutaneous melanoma treatment. This model starts with primary excision and an initial operational safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a re-excision with an additional field of operational security, determined by histologically established tumor thickness (with or without removal of SLN). We present a brand new method of melanoma surgery, the so-called One Step melanoma surgery (OSMS), in which cutaneous melanomas (regardless of their thickness) could be removed by single surgical intervention. CASE REPORT: We describe a case of a patient with cutaneous melanoma, with postoperatively established Breslow’s tumor thickness of 6 mm, operated on the AJCC model within two surgical sessions. The usual primary excision was performed with a surgical safety margin of 0.5 cm in all directions, followed by a secondary excision with an additional surgical security field of 1.2 cm in all directions (due to the patient’s wish for the optimal cosmetic result, agreed and approved by the dermatosurgeon performing the manipulation). CONCLUSION: The two-stage method for the treatment of melanomas is often insufficient due to: 1) the inability (in this case) secondary excision in the face area to be conducted with an additional recommended operational security field of 1.5 cm in all directions; and 2) the patient’s wish for a better cosmetic result, which should be achieved with less surgical security field, resulting in a compromise solution for re-excision with an additional surgical field of 1.2 cm in all directions. Republic of Macedonia 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6311480/ /pubmed/30607193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.511 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Georgi Tchernev, Ivanka Temelkova. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Case Report
Tchernev, Georgi
Temelkova, Ivanka
Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title_full Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title_short Comparative Analysis of the “Scholastic” Recommendations of the AJCC From 2011 for the Surgical Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma with the Newly Suggested Guidelines for OSMS From the Bulgarian Society For Dermatologic Surgery!
title_sort comparative analysis of the “scholastic” recommendations of the ajcc from 2011 for the surgical treatment of cutaneous melanoma with the newly suggested guidelines for osms from the bulgarian society for dermatologic surgery!
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30607193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.511
work_keys_str_mv AT tchernevgeorgi comparativeanalysisofthescholasticrecommendationsoftheajccfrom2011forthesurgicaltreatmentofcutaneousmelanomawiththenewlysuggestedguidelinesforosmsfromthebulgariansocietyfordermatologicsurgery
AT temelkovaivanka comparativeanalysisofthescholasticrecommendationsoftheajccfrom2011forthesurgicaltreatmentofcutaneousmelanomawiththenewlysuggestedguidelinesforosmsfromthebulgariansocietyfordermatologicsurgery