Cargando…

Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION: Femoral graft fixation in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a key factor to the success of this procedure. The aim of this study is to compare two different femoral fixation methods in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 147 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abalo, Eduardo, Mallea, Andrés, Previgliano, Juan Pablo, Pinotti, Norberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311659/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00200
_version_ 1783383646586011648
author Abalo, Eduardo
Mallea, Andrés
Previgliano, Juan Pablo
Pinotti, Norberto
author_facet Abalo, Eduardo
Mallea, Andrés
Previgliano, Juan Pablo
Pinotti, Norberto
author_sort Abalo, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Femoral graft fixation in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a key factor to the success of this procedure. The aim of this study is to compare two different femoral fixation methods in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 147 patients with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadruple hamstring grafts were retrospectively analyzed. 16 were female and 131 male, average age was 26.3 years. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with an average of 62 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the femoral graft fixation: in ninety eight patients a transverse fixation was used, and in forty nine a cortical fixation with femoral button. Tibial interference screws were used for both groups. Clinical evaluation with Lysholm Score and IKDC was performed. RESULTS: Lysholm score results show no significant differences between the groups, being 94.24 points in the group with the transversal fixation system and 93.26 in the other group. According to the IKDC, 141 patients presented a normal or close to normal knee and 1 patient presented an abnormal knee. Five patients presented graft rupture (3.4%), 3 from the cortical fixation with button group (6.12%) and two with transverse fixation (2.04%). CONCLUSION: In this study, cortical button femoral fixation for autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction had no significant difference in terms of clinical outcomes compared with suspensory transfemoral fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63116592019-01-09 Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Abalo, Eduardo Mallea, Andrés Previgliano, Juan Pablo Pinotti, Norberto Orthop J Sports Med Article INTRODUCTION: Femoral graft fixation in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a key factor to the success of this procedure. The aim of this study is to compare two different femoral fixation methods in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 147 patients with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadruple hamstring grafts were retrospectively analyzed. 16 were female and 131 male, average age was 26.3 years. The minimum follow-up was 12 months with an average of 62 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to the femoral graft fixation: in ninety eight patients a transverse fixation was used, and in forty nine a cortical fixation with femoral button. Tibial interference screws were used for both groups. Clinical evaluation with Lysholm Score and IKDC was performed. RESULTS: Lysholm score results show no significant differences between the groups, being 94.24 points in the group with the transversal fixation system and 93.26 in the other group. According to the IKDC, 141 patients presented a normal or close to normal knee and 1 patient presented an abnormal knee. Five patients presented graft rupture (3.4%), 3 from the cortical fixation with button group (6.12%) and two with transverse fixation (2.04%). CONCLUSION: In this study, cortical button femoral fixation for autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction had no significant difference in terms of clinical outcomes compared with suspensory transfemoral fixation. SAGE Publications 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6311659/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00200 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Abalo, Eduardo
Mallea, Andrés
Previgliano, Juan Pablo
Pinotti, Norberto
Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort comparative results between two femoral fixation methods in hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311659/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00200
work_keys_str_mv AT abaloeduardo comparativeresultsbetweentwofemoralfixationmethodsinhamstringgraftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT malleaandres comparativeresultsbetweentwofemoralfixationmethodsinhamstringgraftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT previglianojuanpablo comparativeresultsbetweentwofemoralfixationmethodsinhamstringgraftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT pinottinorberto comparativeresultsbetweentwofemoralfixationmethodsinhamstringgraftanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction