Cargando…

Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

BACKGROUND: We considered the possibility of underestimation of the amount of bleeding during laparoscopic surgery, and we investigated comparing the amount of bleeding between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery by considering the concentration of hemoglobin before and after surgery as indicators...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Masakazu, Koizumi, Minako, Inaba, Kei, Takahashi, Yu, Nagashima, Natsuki, Ki, Hiroshi, Itaoka, Nao, Ueshima, Chiharu, Nakata, Maki, Hasumi, Yoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3802532
_version_ 1783383667970670592
author Sato, Masakazu
Koizumi, Minako
Inaba, Kei
Takahashi, Yu
Nagashima, Natsuki
Ki, Hiroshi
Itaoka, Nao
Ueshima, Chiharu
Nakata, Maki
Hasumi, Yoko
author_facet Sato, Masakazu
Koizumi, Minako
Inaba, Kei
Takahashi, Yu
Nagashima, Natsuki
Ki, Hiroshi
Itaoka, Nao
Ueshima, Chiharu
Nakata, Maki
Hasumi, Yoko
author_sort Sato, Masakazu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We considered the possibility of underestimation of the amount of bleeding during laparoscopic surgery, and we investigated comparing the amount of bleeding between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery by considering the concentration of hemoglobin before and after surgery as indicators. METHODS: The following procedures were included: A, surgery for ovarian tumor; B, myomectomy; and C, hysterectomy either by laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. Patients who underwent the above procedures in between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were enrolled. We identified 1749 cases (A: 90, B: 105, and C: 325 of open surgery and A: 667, B: 437, and C: 125 of laparoscopic surgery). We considered the sum as an estimation of blood loss during surgery and the change in the value of hemoglobin in laboratory testing one day before and after surgery. RESULTS: During laparoscopic surgery, the measurements of blood loss included the following: A: 59.8 ml; B: 168.6 ml; and C: 206.8 ml. During open surgery, measurements of blood loss included the following: A: 130.7 ml; B: 236.7 ml; and C; 280.9 ml. The reduction of hemoglobin after surgery compared with that before surgery was less in laparoscopic surgery than that in open surgery in A and B; however, this reduction was not significantly different in C. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the estimation of the bleeding in A and B was appropriate; however, the estimation might be underestimated in C during laparoscopic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63117842019-01-15 Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Sato, Masakazu Koizumi, Minako Inaba, Kei Takahashi, Yu Nagashima, Natsuki Ki, Hiroshi Itaoka, Nao Ueshima, Chiharu Nakata, Maki Hasumi, Yoko Obstet Gynecol Int Research Article BACKGROUND: We considered the possibility of underestimation of the amount of bleeding during laparoscopic surgery, and we investigated comparing the amount of bleeding between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery by considering the concentration of hemoglobin before and after surgery as indicators. METHODS: The following procedures were included: A, surgery for ovarian tumor; B, myomectomy; and C, hysterectomy either by laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. Patients who underwent the above procedures in between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, were enrolled. We identified 1749 cases (A: 90, B: 105, and C: 325 of open surgery and A: 667, B: 437, and C: 125 of laparoscopic surgery). We considered the sum as an estimation of blood loss during surgery and the change in the value of hemoglobin in laboratory testing one day before and after surgery. RESULTS: During laparoscopic surgery, the measurements of blood loss included the following: A: 59.8 ml; B: 168.6 ml; and C: 206.8 ml. During open surgery, measurements of blood loss included the following: A: 130.7 ml; B: 236.7 ml; and C; 280.9 ml. The reduction of hemoglobin after surgery compared with that before surgery was less in laparoscopic surgery than that in open surgery in A and B; however, this reduction was not significantly different in C. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the estimation of the bleeding in A and B was appropriate; however, the estimation might be underestimated in C during laparoscopic surgery. Hindawi 2018-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6311784/ /pubmed/30647741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3802532 Text en Copyright © 2018 Masakazu Sato et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sato, Masakazu
Koizumi, Minako
Inaba, Kei
Takahashi, Yu
Nagashima, Natsuki
Ki, Hiroshi
Itaoka, Nao
Ueshima, Chiharu
Nakata, Maki
Hasumi, Yoko
Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_full Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_fullStr Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_full_unstemmed Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_short Gynecologists May Underestimate the Amount of Blood Loss during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
title_sort gynecologists may underestimate the amount of blood loss during total laparoscopic hysterectomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3802532
work_keys_str_mv AT satomasakazu gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT koizumiminako gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT inabakei gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT takahashiyu gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT nagashimanatsuki gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT kihiroshi gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT itaokanao gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT ueshimachiharu gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT nakatamaki gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy
AT hasumiyoko gynecologistsmayunderestimatetheamountofbloodlossduringtotallaparoscopichysterectomy