Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: Numerous medical strategies have been proposed for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED); however, the best methods for standard treatment are still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to integrate previous evidence to create hierarchies of comparativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Nuo, Cui, Yi, Xie, Tianlu, Zheng, Mi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7184163
_version_ 1783383684502519808
author Xu, Nuo
Cui, Yi
Xie, Tianlu
Zheng, Mi
author_facet Xu, Nuo
Cui, Yi
Xie, Tianlu
Zheng, Mi
author_sort Xu, Nuo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Numerous medical strategies have been proposed for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED); however, the best methods for standard treatment are still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to integrate previous evidence to create hierarchies of comparative efficacy of eleven commonly used medical treatments for TED. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic scientific literature databases was performed and the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment outcomes for patients with active TED were selected. Treatment strategies included in this network meta-analysis were intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGC), oral glucocorticoids (OGC), orbital injection of glucocorticoids (OIGC), orbital radiotherapy (OR), intravenous glucocorticoids combined with orbital radiotherapy (IVGC + OR), oral glucocorticoids combined with orbital radiotherapy (OGC + OR), rituximab (RTX), somatostatin analogs, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), teprotumumab, and cyclosporine. The outcomes were response rate, mean difference in proptosis reduction, and reduction in disease activity. A random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequent method was conducted in STATA. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies comprising a total of 1047 patients were included in the analysis. Inconsistency plots showed heterogeneity in the IVGC-Placebo-RTX loop to some extent (RoR = 8.029, P=0.075). Rankings of response rates were as follows: IVGC + OR, teprotumumab, IVGC, OGC + OR, RTX, OIGC, OR, IVIG, OGC, somatostatin, placebo, and cyclosporine. The rank probability analysis of proptosis reduction showed that teprotumumab was the most effective, followed by IVGC, IVGC + OR, OIGC, OGC, OGC + OR, OR, somatostatin, cyclosporine, and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: IVGC, alone or combination with OR, and teprotumumab should be preferred as the most effective strategies for active moderate to severe TED. Teprotumumab showed profound effect on proptosis reduction. OIGC, OR, and somatostatin analogs showed some statistical benefit and can be employed as second-line treatment strategies. RTX is a promising biologic agent, but more RCTs are required to define its appropriate role in treating TED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63118512019-01-15 Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis Xu, Nuo Cui, Yi Xie, Tianlu Zheng, Mi J Ophthalmol Review Article PURPOSE: Numerous medical strategies have been proposed for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED); however, the best methods for standard treatment are still a matter of controversy. The purpose of this network meta-analysis was to integrate previous evidence to create hierarchies of comparative efficacy of eleven commonly used medical treatments for TED. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic scientific literature databases was performed and the data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment outcomes for patients with active TED were selected. Treatment strategies included in this network meta-analysis were intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGC), oral glucocorticoids (OGC), orbital injection of glucocorticoids (OIGC), orbital radiotherapy (OR), intravenous glucocorticoids combined with orbital radiotherapy (IVGC + OR), oral glucocorticoids combined with orbital radiotherapy (OGC + OR), rituximab (RTX), somatostatin analogs, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), teprotumumab, and cyclosporine. The outcomes were response rate, mean difference in proptosis reduction, and reduction in disease activity. A random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequent method was conducted in STATA. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies comprising a total of 1047 patients were included in the analysis. Inconsistency plots showed heterogeneity in the IVGC-Placebo-RTX loop to some extent (RoR = 8.029, P=0.075). Rankings of response rates were as follows: IVGC + OR, teprotumumab, IVGC, OGC + OR, RTX, OIGC, OR, IVIG, OGC, somatostatin, placebo, and cyclosporine. The rank probability analysis of proptosis reduction showed that teprotumumab was the most effective, followed by IVGC, IVGC + OR, OIGC, OGC, OGC + OR, OR, somatostatin, cyclosporine, and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: IVGC, alone or combination with OR, and teprotumumab should be preferred as the most effective strategies for active moderate to severe TED. Teprotumumab showed profound effect on proptosis reduction. OIGC, OR, and somatostatin analogs showed some statistical benefit and can be employed as second-line treatment strategies. RTX is a promising biologic agent, but more RCTs are required to define its appropriate role in treating TED. Hindawi 2018-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6311851/ /pubmed/30647961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7184163 Text en Copyright © 2018 Nuo Xu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Xu, Nuo
Cui, Yi
Xie, Tianlu
Zheng, Mi
Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Medical Treatments for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of medical treatments for thyroid eye disease: a network meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30647961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/7184163
work_keys_str_mv AT xunuo comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthyroideyediseaseanetworkmetaanalysis
AT cuiyi comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthyroideyediseaseanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xietianlu comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthyroideyediseaseanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhengmi comparativeefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthyroideyediseaseanetworkmetaanalysis