Cargando…

Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION: Lung-protective ventilation strategy and prone positioning are the strategies practiced to manage patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility (dIVC) Index has been used for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in supine position...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghosh, Pralay Shankar, Azim, Afzal, Saran, Sai, Baronia, Arvind Kumar, Poddar, Banani, Singh, Ratender Kumar, Gurjar, Mohan, Mishra, Prabhaker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662221
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_432_18
_version_ 1783383712411418624
author Ghosh, Pralay Shankar
Azim, Afzal
Saran, Sai
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Poddar, Banani
Singh, Ratender Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Mishra, Prabhaker
author_facet Ghosh, Pralay Shankar
Azim, Afzal
Saran, Sai
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Poddar, Banani
Singh, Ratender Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Mishra, Prabhaker
author_sort Ghosh, Pralay Shankar
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lung-protective ventilation strategy and prone positioning are the strategies practiced to manage patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility (dIVC) Index has been used for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in supine position. We conducted this study to observe the utility of dIVC in prone position in ARDS patients and compare it with esophageal Doppler (ED) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical clearance, a prospective observational pilot study was conducted in a 12-bedded tertiary care hospital. Adult ARDS patients who were treated with prone ventilation were included. Informed consent was taken from the relatives. IVC was visualized through right lateral approach both in supine and prone positions. We compared IVC distensibility and ED parameters, first in 45° head up and then in prone. FR was defined as an increase in the stroke volume of ≥15% as measured by ED. The patients with dIVC >18% were assumed to be fluid responsive. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. ARDS was (mean P/F ratio 116.64 ± 44.76) mostly due to pulmonary etiology. Out of 25 patients, 10 patients were fluid responsive based on dIVC (cutoff >18%) in supine position. When compared to ED values after passive leg raising, dIVC had a sensitivity and specificity of 77.78% and 81.25%, respectively, in predicting FR with a moderate-to-absolute agreement between the two methods. IVC distensibility showed statistically significant negative correlation with corrected flow time (FTc) values both in supine and in prone positions. CONCLUSION: IVC variability can be observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients in prone position. Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility correlates with flow time in both the positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6311971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63119712019-01-18 Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study Ghosh, Pralay Shankar Azim, Afzal Saran, Sai Baronia, Arvind Kumar Poddar, Banani Singh, Ratender Kumar Gurjar, Mohan Mishra, Prabhaker Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article INTRODUCTION: Lung-protective ventilation strategy and prone positioning are the strategies practiced to manage patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility (dIVC) Index has been used for predicting fluid responsiveness (FR) in supine position. We conducted this study to observe the utility of dIVC in prone position in ARDS patients and compare it with esophageal Doppler (ED) parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After ethical clearance, a prospective observational pilot study was conducted in a 12-bedded tertiary care hospital. Adult ARDS patients who were treated with prone ventilation were included. Informed consent was taken from the relatives. IVC was visualized through right lateral approach both in supine and prone positions. We compared IVC distensibility and ED parameters, first in 45° head up and then in prone. FR was defined as an increase in the stroke volume of ≥15% as measured by ED. The patients with dIVC >18% were assumed to be fluid responsive. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 20. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. ARDS was (mean P/F ratio 116.64 ± 44.76) mostly due to pulmonary etiology. Out of 25 patients, 10 patients were fluid responsive based on dIVC (cutoff >18%) in supine position. When compared to ED values after passive leg raising, dIVC had a sensitivity and specificity of 77.78% and 81.25%, respectively, in predicting FR with a moderate-to-absolute agreement between the two methods. IVC distensibility showed statistically significant negative correlation with corrected flow time (FTc) values both in supine and in prone positions. CONCLUSION: IVC variability can be observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients in prone position. Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility correlates with flow time in both the positions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6311971/ /pubmed/30662221 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_432_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ghosh, Pralay Shankar
Azim, Afzal
Saran, Sai
Baronia, Arvind Kumar
Poddar, Banani
Singh, Ratender Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Mishra, Prabhaker
Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title_full Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title_short Comparison of Hemodynamic Monitoring between Transesophageal Doppler and Ultrasonography-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility in Supine versus Prone Position: A Pilot Study
title_sort comparison of hemodynamic monitoring between transesophageal doppler and ultrasonography-guided inferior vena cava distensibility in supine versus prone position: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6311971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662221
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_432_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ghoshpralayshankar comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT azimafzal comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT saransai comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT baroniaarvindkumar comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT poddarbanani comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT singhratenderkumar comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT gurjarmohan comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy
AT mishraprabhaker comparisonofhemodynamicmonitoringbetweentransesophagealdopplerandultrasonographyguidedinferiorvenacavadistensibilityinsupineversuspronepositionapilotstudy