Cargando…
Should S-1 be better than capecitabine for patients with advanced gastric cancer in Asia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: S-1 or capecitabine (Cap) containing treatment is an increasingly used strategy in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Asia. It is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support which regimen is better. METHODS: A systematic review of retrospective studies and randomized co...
Autores principales: | Ye, Ziqi, Chen, Jie, Rao, Yuefeng, Yang, Wenchao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30643425 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S187815 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-Analysis of Capecitabine versus 5-Fluorouracil in Advanced Gastric Cancer
por: Wu, Zhongliang, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Is discard better than return gastric residual aspirates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wen, Zunjia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine monotherapy versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer
por: Peng, Jingyuan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer
por: Lu, Zhihao, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Subcutaneous bortezomib might be standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Ye, Ziqi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)