Cargando…

Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study

The human-animal relationship can have a major impact on cow welfare and stockpersons´ work safety and quality. This cross-sectional study investigated possible effects of stockperson and farm related factors on cows´ behaviour towards humans in different test situations on a range of farm types inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebinghaus, Asja, Ivemeyer, Silvia, Knierim, Ute
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209817
_version_ 1783383739435319296
author Ebinghaus, Asja
Ivemeyer, Silvia
Knierim, Ute
author_facet Ebinghaus, Asja
Ivemeyer, Silvia
Knierim, Ute
author_sort Ebinghaus, Asja
collection PubMed
description The human-animal relationship can have a major impact on cow welfare and stockpersons´ work safety and quality. This cross-sectional study investigated possible effects of stockperson and farm related factors on cows´ behaviour towards humans in different test situations on a range of farm types including farms with automatic milking system. On 32 dairy farms, cows´ avoidance distances (AD), tolerance to tactile interactions (TTI), behavioural reactions during and after release from restraint (RB) and expressive behaviour by means of qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA) were recorded. Multiple regressions were calculated to analyse associations between the cows´ responses towards humans and factors of stockpersons´ attitudes, factors of human-animal contact and further herd and management characteristics. Positive attitudes towards cows were significantly associated with calmer cows in all test situations. Furthermore, different herd and management factors were related to individual variables of cows´ behaviour towards humans: for instance, the percentage of dehorned cows in the herd was associated with more fearful cows; the frequency of human-animal contact, manual feed provision, or selection for docility were associated with calmer cows. Explained variances were highest for the outcome variables AD and QBA. Directly or indirectly all factors remaining in the final models may be related to the amount and quality of human-animal contacts. Thus, the results suggest that on a broad range of different farm types a positive attitude and frequent human-animal contact can contribute to calmer cows in different interactions with humans in the barn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6312231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63122312019-01-08 Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study Ebinghaus, Asja Ivemeyer, Silvia Knierim, Ute PLoS One Research Article The human-animal relationship can have a major impact on cow welfare and stockpersons´ work safety and quality. This cross-sectional study investigated possible effects of stockperson and farm related factors on cows´ behaviour towards humans in different test situations on a range of farm types including farms with automatic milking system. On 32 dairy farms, cows´ avoidance distances (AD), tolerance to tactile interactions (TTI), behavioural reactions during and after release from restraint (RB) and expressive behaviour by means of qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA) were recorded. Multiple regressions were calculated to analyse associations between the cows´ responses towards humans and factors of stockpersons´ attitudes, factors of human-animal contact and further herd and management characteristics. Positive attitudes towards cows were significantly associated with calmer cows in all test situations. Furthermore, different herd and management factors were related to individual variables of cows´ behaviour towards humans: for instance, the percentage of dehorned cows in the herd was associated with more fearful cows; the frequency of human-animal contact, manual feed provision, or selection for docility were associated with calmer cows. Explained variances were highest for the outcome variables AD and QBA. Directly or indirectly all factors remaining in the final models may be related to the amount and quality of human-animal contacts. Thus, the results suggest that on a broad range of different farm types a positive attitude and frequent human-animal contact can contribute to calmer cows in different interactions with humans in the barn. Public Library of Science 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6312231/ /pubmed/30596783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209817 Text en © 2018 Ebinghaus et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ebinghaus, Asja
Ivemeyer, Silvia
Knierim, Ute
Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title_full Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title_short Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
title_sort human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209817
work_keys_str_mv AT ebinghausasja humanandfarminfluencesondairycowsresponsivenesstowardshumansacrosssectionalstudy
AT ivemeyersilvia humanandfarminfluencesondairycowsresponsivenesstowardshumansacrosssectionalstudy
AT knierimute humanandfarminfluencesondairycowsresponsivenesstowardshumansacrosssectionalstudy