Cargando…

Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data

The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Hyatt E., Haydel, K. Farish, Banda, Jorge A., Fiterau, Madalina, Desai, Manisha, Robinson, Thomas N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006
_version_ 1783383743194464256
author Moore, Hyatt E.
Haydel, K. Farish
Banda, Jorge A.
Fiterau, Madalina
Desai, Manisha
Robinson, Thomas N.
author_facet Moore, Hyatt E.
Haydel, K. Farish
Banda, Jorge A.
Fiterau, Madalina
Desai, Manisha
Robinson, Thomas N.
author_sort Moore, Hyatt E.
collection PubMed
description The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003–2004). We discuss two corner case conditions that can produce unexpected, and perhaps unintended results when the algorithm is applied. We show, using simulated data of two special cases, how this algorithm classifies a 24-hour period with only 72 total counts as 100% wear in one case, and classifies a 24-hour period with 96,000 counts as 0.1% wear in another. The prevalence of like scenarios in the NHANES 2003–2004 PAM dataset is presented with corresponding summary statistics for varying degrees of the algorithm’s nonwear classification threshold (T). The number of participants with valid days, defined as 10 or more hours classified as wear time in a 24-hour day, increased while the mean counts-per-minute (CPM) decreased as the threshold for excluding non-wear was reduced from the allowed 4,000 counts in an hour. The number of participants with four or more valid days increased 2.29% (n = 113) and mean CPM dropped 2.45% (9.5 CPM) when adjusting the nonwear classification threshold to 50 counts an hour. Applying the most liberal criteria, only excluding hours as nonwear which contained 1 count or less, resulted in a 397 more participants (7.83% increase) and 26.5 fewer CPM (6.98% decrease) in NHANES 2003–2004 participants with four or more valid days. The algorithm should be used with caution due to the potential influence of these corner cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6312247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63122472019-01-08 Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data Moore, Hyatt E. Haydel, K. Farish Banda, Jorge A. Fiterau, Madalina Desai, Manisha Robinson, Thomas N. PLoS One Research Article The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003–2004). We discuss two corner case conditions that can produce unexpected, and perhaps unintended results when the algorithm is applied. We show, using simulated data of two special cases, how this algorithm classifies a 24-hour period with only 72 total counts as 100% wear in one case, and classifies a 24-hour period with 96,000 counts as 0.1% wear in another. The prevalence of like scenarios in the NHANES 2003–2004 PAM dataset is presented with corresponding summary statistics for varying degrees of the algorithm’s nonwear classification threshold (T). The number of participants with valid days, defined as 10 or more hours classified as wear time in a 24-hour day, increased while the mean counts-per-minute (CPM) decreased as the threshold for excluding non-wear was reduced from the allowed 4,000 counts in an hour. The number of participants with four or more valid days increased 2.29% (n = 113) and mean CPM dropped 2.45% (9.5 CPM) when adjusting the nonwear classification threshold to 50 counts an hour. Applying the most liberal criteria, only excluding hours as nonwear which contained 1 count or less, resulted in a 397 more participants (7.83% increase) and 26.5 fewer CPM (6.98% decrease) in NHANES 2003–2004 participants with four or more valid days. The algorithm should be used with caution due to the potential influence of these corner cases. Public Library of Science 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6312247/ /pubmed/30596771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006 Text en © 2018 Moore et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moore, Hyatt E.
Haydel, K. Farish
Banda, Jorge A.
Fiterau, Madalina
Desai, Manisha
Robinson, Thomas N.
Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title_full Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title_fullStr Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title_full_unstemmed Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title_short Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
title_sort potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the national cancer institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006
work_keys_str_mv AT moorehyatte potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata
AT haydelkfarish potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata
AT bandajorgea potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata
AT fiteraumadalina potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata
AT desaimanisha potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata
AT robinsonthomasn potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata