Cargando…
Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data
The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006 |
_version_ | 1783383743194464256 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Hyatt E. Haydel, K. Farish Banda, Jorge A. Fiterau, Madalina Desai, Manisha Robinson, Thomas N. |
author_facet | Moore, Hyatt E. Haydel, K. Farish Banda, Jorge A. Fiterau, Madalina Desai, Manisha Robinson, Thomas N. |
author_sort | Moore, Hyatt E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003–2004). We discuss two corner case conditions that can produce unexpected, and perhaps unintended results when the algorithm is applied. We show, using simulated data of two special cases, how this algorithm classifies a 24-hour period with only 72 total counts as 100% wear in one case, and classifies a 24-hour period with 96,000 counts as 0.1% wear in another. The prevalence of like scenarios in the NHANES 2003–2004 PAM dataset is presented with corresponding summary statistics for varying degrees of the algorithm’s nonwear classification threshold (T). The number of participants with valid days, defined as 10 or more hours classified as wear time in a 24-hour day, increased while the mean counts-per-minute (CPM) decreased as the threshold for excluding non-wear was reduced from the allowed 4,000 counts in an hour. The number of participants with four or more valid days increased 2.29% (n = 113) and mean CPM dropped 2.45% (9.5 CPM) when adjusting the nonwear classification threshold to 50 counts an hour. Applying the most liberal criteria, only excluding hours as nonwear which contained 1 count or less, resulted in a 397 more participants (7.83% increase) and 26.5 fewer CPM (6.98% decrease) in NHANES 2003–2004 participants with four or more valid days. The algorithm should be used with caution due to the potential influence of these corner cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6312247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63122472019-01-08 Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data Moore, Hyatt E. Haydel, K. Farish Banda, Jorge A. Fiterau, Madalina Desai, Manisha Robinson, Thomas N. PLoS One Research Article The National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts—a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration—to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003–2004). We discuss two corner case conditions that can produce unexpected, and perhaps unintended results when the algorithm is applied. We show, using simulated data of two special cases, how this algorithm classifies a 24-hour period with only 72 total counts as 100% wear in one case, and classifies a 24-hour period with 96,000 counts as 0.1% wear in another. The prevalence of like scenarios in the NHANES 2003–2004 PAM dataset is presented with corresponding summary statistics for varying degrees of the algorithm’s nonwear classification threshold (T). The number of participants with valid days, defined as 10 or more hours classified as wear time in a 24-hour day, increased while the mean counts-per-minute (CPM) decreased as the threshold for excluding non-wear was reduced from the allowed 4,000 counts in an hour. The number of participants with four or more valid days increased 2.29% (n = 113) and mean CPM dropped 2.45% (9.5 CPM) when adjusting the nonwear classification threshold to 50 counts an hour. Applying the most liberal criteria, only excluding hours as nonwear which contained 1 count or less, resulted in a 397 more participants (7.83% increase) and 26.5 fewer CPM (6.98% decrease) in NHANES 2003–2004 participants with four or more valid days. The algorithm should be used with caution due to the potential influence of these corner cases. Public Library of Science 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6312247/ /pubmed/30596771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006 Text en © 2018 Moore et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moore, Hyatt E. Haydel, K. Farish Banda, Jorge A. Fiterau, Madalina Desai, Manisha Robinson, Thomas N. Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title | Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title_full | Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title_fullStr | Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title_short | Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
title_sort | potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the national cancer institute’s nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorehyatte potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata AT haydelkfarish potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata AT bandajorgea potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata AT fiteraumadalina potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata AT desaimanisha potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata AT robinsonthomasn potentialcornercasecautionsregardingpubliclyavailableimplementationsofthenationalcancerinstitutesnonwearwearclassificationalgorithmforaccelerometerdata |