Cargando…

Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging

PURPOSE: to evaluate diagnostic value and image quality of T2-weighted Three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (SPACE) in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences for comprehensive evaluation of lumbar spine pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hossein, Jomleh, Fariborz, Faeghi, Mehrnaz, Rasteh, Babak, Rafiei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.003
_version_ 1783383837909188608
author Hossein, Jomleh
Fariborz, Faeghi
Mehrnaz, Rasteh
Babak, Rafiei
author_facet Hossein, Jomleh
Fariborz, Faeghi
Mehrnaz, Rasteh
Babak, Rafiei
author_sort Hossein, Jomleh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: to evaluate diagnostic value and image quality of T2-weighted Three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (SPACE) in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences for comprehensive evaluation of lumbar spine pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five participants with lumbar discopathy were examined on a 1.5-T MRI system with both 2D TSE and 3D SPACE sequences. Obtained images were analyzed with synedra view personal (V 17.0.0.2) software in terms of calculating image quality factors such as signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for selected regions of interest. In addition, images were referred to radiologists to report their pathologic indexes. The visibility of anatomical structures in the 3D and 2D sequences was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists independently. Cohen's kappa (k) and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: In this study, the 3D SPACE T2-weighted sequence showed significant higher SNR and CNR as well as visibility in all of the regions of interest except vertebrae and intervertebral discs (p-value < 0.05). Inter-observer agreement for visibility of regions of interest was substantial and perfect (k > 0.6). Also, inter-observer and inter-method agreements for pathologic indexes were substantial and perfect for all of the pathologic indexes (k > 0.6). Inter-observer agreement for 3D SPACE sequence was higher (k = 0.793) in comparison with 2D-TSE sequence (k = 0.603). 3D SPACE sequence and its multi-planar reconstructions (MPR) scan time were less (192 s) than 2D TSE in the sagittal, axial and coronal planes (209 s). CONCLUSION: 3D SPACE sequence for lumbar spine MRI proved to have higher SNR, CNR, and visibility for all regions of lumbar spine except vertebrae and disc. Inter-observer and inter-method agreements for pathologic indexes between 3D SPACE and 2D TSE sequences were substantial and 3D SPACE had a higher inter-observer agreement and less scan time. Therefore, T2 weighted 3D SPACE sequence, and its MPR might be an excellent alternative for 2D TSE in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes, especially for patients with abnormal curvature of the lumbar spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6312863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63128632019-01-07 Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging Hossein, Jomleh Fariborz, Faeghi Mehrnaz, Rasteh Babak, Rafiei Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: to evaluate diagnostic value and image quality of T2-weighted Three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (SPACE) in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences for comprehensive evaluation of lumbar spine pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five participants with lumbar discopathy were examined on a 1.5-T MRI system with both 2D TSE and 3D SPACE sequences. Obtained images were analyzed with synedra view personal (V 17.0.0.2) software in terms of calculating image quality factors such as signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) for selected regions of interest. In addition, images were referred to radiologists to report their pathologic indexes. The visibility of anatomical structures in the 3D and 2D sequences was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists independently. Cohen's kappa (k) and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: In this study, the 3D SPACE T2-weighted sequence showed significant higher SNR and CNR as well as visibility in all of the regions of interest except vertebrae and intervertebral discs (p-value < 0.05). Inter-observer agreement for visibility of regions of interest was substantial and perfect (k > 0.6). Also, inter-observer and inter-method agreements for pathologic indexes were substantial and perfect for all of the pathologic indexes (k > 0.6). Inter-observer agreement for 3D SPACE sequence was higher (k = 0.793) in comparison with 2D-TSE sequence (k = 0.603). 3D SPACE sequence and its multi-planar reconstructions (MPR) scan time were less (192 s) than 2D TSE in the sagittal, axial and coronal planes (209 s). CONCLUSION: 3D SPACE sequence for lumbar spine MRI proved to have higher SNR, CNR, and visibility for all regions of lumbar spine except vertebrae and disc. Inter-observer and inter-method agreements for pathologic indexes between 3D SPACE and 2D TSE sequences were substantial and 3D SPACE had a higher inter-observer agreement and less scan time. Therefore, T2 weighted 3D SPACE sequence, and its MPR might be an excellent alternative for 2D TSE in sagittal, axial, and coronal planes, especially for patients with abnormal curvature of the lumbar spine. Elsevier 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6312863/ /pubmed/30619918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hossein, Jomleh
Fariborz, Faeghi
Mehrnaz, Rasteh
Babak, Rafiei
Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title_full Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title_fullStr Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title_short Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging
title_sort evaluation of diagnostic value and t2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3d-space) image quality in comparison with t2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2d-tse) sequences in lumbar spine mr imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT hosseinjomleh evaluationofdiagnosticvalueandt2weightedthreedimensionalisotropicturbospinecho3dspaceimagequalityincomparisonwitht2weightedtwodimensionalturbospinecho2dtsesequencesinlumbarspinemrimaging
AT fariborzfaeghi evaluationofdiagnosticvalueandt2weightedthreedimensionalisotropicturbospinecho3dspaceimagequalityincomparisonwitht2weightedtwodimensionalturbospinecho2dtsesequencesinlumbarspinemrimaging
AT mehrnazrasteh evaluationofdiagnosticvalueandt2weightedthreedimensionalisotropicturbospinecho3dspaceimagequalityincomparisonwitht2weightedtwodimensionalturbospinecho2dtsesequencesinlumbarspinemrimaging
AT babakrafiei evaluationofdiagnosticvalueandt2weightedthreedimensionalisotropicturbospinecho3dspaceimagequalityincomparisonwitht2weightedtwodimensionalturbospinecho2dtsesequencesinlumbarspinemrimaging