Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer

Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin (TE), paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin + cytoxan (TEC) and intensive paclitaxel (IP) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) were compared for the treatment of breast cancer. The clinical data of 326 patients with stage II–III unilateral primary breas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yang, Xu, Zhaoguo, Zhang, Zhenyong, Wen, Guangfu, Sun, Jiaxing, Han, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9658
_version_ 1783383853429161984
author Liu, Yang
Xu, Zhaoguo
Zhang, Zhenyong
Wen, Guangfu
Sun, Jiaxing
Han, Feng
author_facet Liu, Yang
Xu, Zhaoguo
Zhang, Zhenyong
Wen, Guangfu
Sun, Jiaxing
Han, Feng
author_sort Liu, Yang
collection PubMed
description Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin (TE), paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin + cytoxan (TEC) and intensive paclitaxel (IP) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) were compared for the treatment of breast cancer. The clinical data of 326 patients with stage II–III unilateral primary breast cancer treated in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2012 to April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NCT for 4 cycles, including 115 cases of TE group, 109 cases of TEC group, and 102 cases of paclitaxel weekly group. The clinical efficacy was evaluated and complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) indicated clinically effective. The pathological effect was evaluated and the grade III+IV+V indicated pathologically effective. The rates of clinical efficacy and pathological CR (pCR) were compared, and the incidence of adverse reactions was also observed. The effects of different molecular typing on clinical efficacy and pCR were compared. Our results showed that the clinical effective rates in TE, TEC and IP groups were 80.9, 89.0 and 77.5%, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.074). The pCR rates in the three groups were 9.57, 8.26 and 5.88%, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.602). The incidence rate of neutropenia was statistically different among the three groups of patients (P<0.001), which was the highest in TEC group and the lowest in IP group. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of adverse reactions (P>0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-positive states were significantly correlated with the high clinical effective rate and high pCR rate (P<0.05). In conclusion, IP has the lowest incidence rate of neutropenia. Additionally, ER-negative, PR-negative and HER-2-positive states are significantly correlated with the high clinical effective rate and high pCR rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6312931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63129312019-01-17 Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer Liu, Yang Xu, Zhaoguo Zhang, Zhenyong Wen, Guangfu Sun, Jiaxing Han, Feng Oncol Lett Articles Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin (TE), paclitaxel/docetaxel + epirubicin + cytoxan (TEC) and intensive paclitaxel (IP) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) were compared for the treatment of breast cancer. The clinical data of 326 patients with stage II–III unilateral primary breast cancer treated in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2012 to April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received NCT for 4 cycles, including 115 cases of TE group, 109 cases of TEC group, and 102 cases of paclitaxel weekly group. The clinical efficacy was evaluated and complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) indicated clinically effective. The pathological effect was evaluated and the grade III+IV+V indicated pathologically effective. The rates of clinical efficacy and pathological CR (pCR) were compared, and the incidence of adverse reactions was also observed. The effects of different molecular typing on clinical efficacy and pCR were compared. Our results showed that the clinical effective rates in TE, TEC and IP groups were 80.9, 89.0 and 77.5%, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences (P=0.074). The pCR rates in the three groups were 9.57, 8.26 and 5.88%, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P=0.602). The incidence rate of neutropenia was statistically different among the three groups of patients (P<0.001), which was the highest in TEC group and the lowest in IP group. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence rates of adverse reactions (P>0.05). Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-positive states were significantly correlated with the high clinical effective rate and high pCR rate (P<0.05). In conclusion, IP has the lowest incidence rate of neutropenia. Additionally, ER-negative, PR-negative and HER-2-positive states are significantly correlated with the high clinical effective rate and high pCR rate. D.A. Spandidos 2019-01 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6312931/ /pubmed/30655846 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9658 Text en Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Liu, Yang
Xu, Zhaoguo
Zhang, Zhenyong
Wen, Guangfu
Sun, Jiaxing
Han, Feng
Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title_full Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title_short Efficacy and safety of TE/TEC/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
title_sort efficacy and safety of te/tec/intensive paclitaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655846
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9658
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyang efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT xuzhaoguo efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT zhangzhenyong efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT wenguangfu efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT sunjiaxing efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer
AT hanfeng efficacyandsafetyoftetecintensivepaclitaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapyforthetreatmentofbreastcancer