Cargando…

Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival

Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballester, Leonor, Martínez, Rafael, Méndez, Juan, Miró, Gloria, Solsona, Manel, Palomera, Elisabeth, Capdevila, Josep Anton, Rodriguez, Alejandro, Yébenes, Juan Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091
_version_ 1783384013954613248
author Ballester, Leonor
Martínez, Rafael
Méndez, Juan
Miró, Gloria
Solsona, Manel
Palomera, Elisabeth
Capdevila, Josep Anton
Rodriguez, Alejandro
Yébenes, Juan Carlos
author_facet Ballester, Leonor
Martínez, Rafael
Méndez, Juan
Miró, Gloria
Solsona, Manel
Palomera, Elisabeth
Capdevila, Josep Anton
Rodriguez, Alejandro
Yébenes, Juan Carlos
author_sort Ballester, Leonor
collection PubMed
description Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affects the initial management and outcomes of patients with community-onset severe sepsis. Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, process of care, and outcome variables were recorded for all patients, at the emergency department of our university hospital, who presented with community-onset severe sepsis, between 1 March and 31 August in three consecutive years. Patient management consisted of standardized bundled care with five measures: Detection, blood cultures and empirical antibiotics, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation (if needed), clinical monitoring, and noradrenalin administration (if needed). We compared all variables between patients who had hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), on admission to the emergency department, and those who did not. Results: We identified 153 episodes (84 (54.5%) men; mean age 73.6 ± 1.2; mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 4.9 ± 2.7, and 41.2% hospital mortality). Hypotension was present on admission to the emergency department in 57 patients (37.2%). Hemodynamic treatment was applied earlier in patients who presented hypotension initially. Antibiotics were administered 48 min later in non-hypotensive sepsis (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients without initial hypotension required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (43.1% for patients initially hypotensive vs. 56.9% in those initially non-hypotensive, p < 0.05). Initial hypotension was not associated with mortality. A delay in door-to-antibiotic administration time was associated with mortality [OR 1.150, 95%CI: 1.043–1.268). Conclusions: Initial management of patients with community-onset severe sepsis differed according to their clinical presentation. Initial hypotension was associated with early hemodynamic management and less ICU requirement. A non-significant delay was observed in the administration of antibiotics to initially non-hypotensive patients. The time of door-to-antibiotic administration was related to mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6313793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63137932019-01-04 Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival Ballester, Leonor Martínez, Rafael Méndez, Juan Miró, Gloria Solsona, Manel Palomera, Elisabeth Capdevila, Josep Anton Rodriguez, Alejandro Yébenes, Juan Carlos Med Sci (Basel) Article Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affects the initial management and outcomes of patients with community-onset severe sepsis. Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, process of care, and outcome variables were recorded for all patients, at the emergency department of our university hospital, who presented with community-onset severe sepsis, between 1 March and 31 August in three consecutive years. Patient management consisted of standardized bundled care with five measures: Detection, blood cultures and empirical antibiotics, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation (if needed), clinical monitoring, and noradrenalin administration (if needed). We compared all variables between patients who had hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), on admission to the emergency department, and those who did not. Results: We identified 153 episodes (84 (54.5%) men; mean age 73.6 ± 1.2; mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 4.9 ± 2.7, and 41.2% hospital mortality). Hypotension was present on admission to the emergency department in 57 patients (37.2%). Hemodynamic treatment was applied earlier in patients who presented hypotension initially. Antibiotics were administered 48 min later in non-hypotensive sepsis (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients without initial hypotension required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (43.1% for patients initially hypotensive vs. 56.9% in those initially non-hypotensive, p < 0.05). Initial hypotension was not associated with mortality. A delay in door-to-antibiotic administration time was associated with mortality [OR 1.150, 95%CI: 1.043–1.268). Conclusions: Initial management of patients with community-onset severe sepsis differed according to their clinical presentation. Initial hypotension was associated with early hemodynamic management and less ICU requirement. A non-significant delay was observed in the administration of antibiotics to initially non-hypotensive patients. The time of door-to-antibiotic administration was related to mortality. MDPI 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6313793/ /pubmed/30309044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ballester, Leonor
Martínez, Rafael
Méndez, Juan
Miró, Gloria
Solsona, Manel
Palomera, Elisabeth
Capdevila, Josep Anton
Rodriguez, Alejandro
Yébenes, Juan Carlos
Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title_full Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title_fullStr Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title_short Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
title_sort differences in hypotensive vs. non-hypotensive sepsis management in the emergency department: door-to-antibiotic time impact on sepsis survival
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091
work_keys_str_mv AT ballesterleonor differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT martinezrafael differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT mendezjuan differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT mirogloria differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT solsonamanel differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT palomeraelisabeth differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT capdevilajosepanton differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT rodriguezalejandro differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival
AT yebenesjuancarlos differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival