Cargando…
Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival
Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091 |
_version_ | 1783384013954613248 |
---|---|
author | Ballester, Leonor Martínez, Rafael Méndez, Juan Miró, Gloria Solsona, Manel Palomera, Elisabeth Capdevila, Josep Anton Rodriguez, Alejandro Yébenes, Juan Carlos |
author_facet | Ballester, Leonor Martínez, Rafael Méndez, Juan Miró, Gloria Solsona, Manel Palomera, Elisabeth Capdevila, Josep Anton Rodriguez, Alejandro Yébenes, Juan Carlos |
author_sort | Ballester, Leonor |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affects the initial management and outcomes of patients with community-onset severe sepsis. Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, process of care, and outcome variables were recorded for all patients, at the emergency department of our university hospital, who presented with community-onset severe sepsis, between 1 March and 31 August in three consecutive years. Patient management consisted of standardized bundled care with five measures: Detection, blood cultures and empirical antibiotics, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation (if needed), clinical monitoring, and noradrenalin administration (if needed). We compared all variables between patients who had hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), on admission to the emergency department, and those who did not. Results: We identified 153 episodes (84 (54.5%) men; mean age 73.6 ± 1.2; mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 4.9 ± 2.7, and 41.2% hospital mortality). Hypotension was present on admission to the emergency department in 57 patients (37.2%). Hemodynamic treatment was applied earlier in patients who presented hypotension initially. Antibiotics were administered 48 min later in non-hypotensive sepsis (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients without initial hypotension required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (43.1% for patients initially hypotensive vs. 56.9% in those initially non-hypotensive, p < 0.05). Initial hypotension was not associated with mortality. A delay in door-to-antibiotic administration time was associated with mortality [OR 1.150, 95%CI: 1.043–1.268). Conclusions: Initial management of patients with community-onset severe sepsis differed according to their clinical presentation. Initial hypotension was associated with early hemodynamic management and less ICU requirement. A non-significant delay was observed in the administration of antibiotics to initially non-hypotensive patients. The time of door-to-antibiotic administration was related to mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6313793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63137932019-01-04 Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival Ballester, Leonor Martínez, Rafael Méndez, Juan Miró, Gloria Solsona, Manel Palomera, Elisabeth Capdevila, Josep Anton Rodriguez, Alejandro Yébenes, Juan Carlos Med Sci (Basel) Article Background: Sepsis diagnosis can be incorrectly associated with the presence of hypotension during an infection, so the detection and management of non-hypotensive sepsis can be delayed. We aimed to evaluate how the presence or absence of hypotension, on admission at the emergency department, affects the initial management and outcomes of patients with community-onset severe sepsis. Methods: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, process of care, and outcome variables were recorded for all patients, at the emergency department of our university hospital, who presented with community-onset severe sepsis, between 1 March and 31 August in three consecutive years. Patient management consisted of standardized bundled care with five measures: Detection, blood cultures and empirical antibiotics, oxygen supplementation and fluid resuscitation (if needed), clinical monitoring, and noradrenalin administration (if needed). We compared all variables between patients who had hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), on admission to the emergency department, and those who did not. Results: We identified 153 episodes (84 (54.5%) men; mean age 73.6 ± 1.2; mean Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 4.9 ± 2.7, and 41.2% hospital mortality). Hypotension was present on admission to the emergency department in 57 patients (37.2%). Hemodynamic treatment was applied earlier in patients who presented hypotension initially. Antibiotics were administered 48 min later in non-hypotensive sepsis (p = 0.08). A higher proportion of patients without initial hypotension required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (43.1% for patients initially hypotensive vs. 56.9% in those initially non-hypotensive, p < 0.05). Initial hypotension was not associated with mortality. A delay in door-to-antibiotic administration time was associated with mortality [OR 1.150, 95%CI: 1.043–1.268). Conclusions: Initial management of patients with community-onset severe sepsis differed according to their clinical presentation. Initial hypotension was associated with early hemodynamic management and less ICU requirement. A non-significant delay was observed in the administration of antibiotics to initially non-hypotensive patients. The time of door-to-antibiotic administration was related to mortality. MDPI 2018-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6313793/ /pubmed/30309044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ballester, Leonor Martínez, Rafael Méndez, Juan Miró, Gloria Solsona, Manel Palomera, Elisabeth Capdevila, Josep Anton Rodriguez, Alejandro Yébenes, Juan Carlos Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title | Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title_full | Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title_fullStr | Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title_short | Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival |
title_sort | differences in hypotensive vs. non-hypotensive sepsis management in the emergency department: door-to-antibiotic time impact on sepsis survival |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30309044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci6040091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballesterleonor differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT martinezrafael differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT mendezjuan differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT mirogloria differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT solsonamanel differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT palomeraelisabeth differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT capdevilajosepanton differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT rodriguezalejandro differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival AT yebenesjuancarlos differencesinhypotensivevsnonhypotensivesepsismanagementintheemergencydepartmentdoortoantibiotictimeimpactonsepsissurvival |