Cargando…

Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paquette, Sarah-Jo, Zaheer, Rahat, Stanford, Kim, Thomas, James, Reuter, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093
_version_ 1783384044388483072
author Paquette, Sarah-Jo
Zaheer, Rahat
Stanford, Kim
Thomas, James
Reuter, Tim
author_facet Paquette, Sarah-Jo
Zaheer, Rahat
Stanford, Kim
Thomas, James
Reuter, Tim
author_sort Paquette, Sarah-Jo
collection PubMed
description Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjected to competition pressures due to limited space and resources but they use various strategies to compete in natural environments. Our objective was to evaluate non-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from cattle feces for their ability to out-compete STEC. Competitive fitness of non-pathogenic E. coli against STEC were assessed in competitions using liquid, agar, and nutrient limiting assays. Winners were determined by enumeration using O-serogroup specific quantitative PCR or a semi-quantitative grading. Initial liquid competitions identified two strong non-pathogenic competitors (O103F and O26E) capable of eliminating various STEC including O157 and O111. The strain O103F was dominant across permeable physical barriers for all tested E. coli and STEC strains indicating the diffusion of antimicrobial molecules. In direct contact and even with temporal disadvantages, O103F out-competed STEC O157E. The results suggest that O103F or the diffusible molecule(s) it produces have a potential to be used as an alternative STEC mitigation strategy, either in medicine or the food industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6313926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63139262019-01-07 Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources Paquette, Sarah-Jo Zaheer, Rahat Stanford, Kim Thomas, James Reuter, Tim Vet Sci Article Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjected to competition pressures due to limited space and resources but they use various strategies to compete in natural environments. Our objective was to evaluate non-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from cattle feces for their ability to out-compete STEC. Competitive fitness of non-pathogenic E. coli against STEC were assessed in competitions using liquid, agar, and nutrient limiting assays. Winners were determined by enumeration using O-serogroup specific quantitative PCR or a semi-quantitative grading. Initial liquid competitions identified two strong non-pathogenic competitors (O103F and O26E) capable of eliminating various STEC including O157 and O111. The strain O103F was dominant across permeable physical barriers for all tested E. coli and STEC strains indicating the diffusion of antimicrobial molecules. In direct contact and even with temporal disadvantages, O103F out-competed STEC O157E. The results suggest that O103F or the diffusible molecule(s) it produces have a potential to be used as an alternative STEC mitigation strategy, either in medicine or the food industry. MDPI 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6313926/ /pubmed/30400157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paquette, Sarah-Jo
Zaheer, Rahat
Stanford, Kim
Thomas, James
Reuter, Tim
Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title_full Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title_fullStr Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title_full_unstemmed Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title_short Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
title_sort competition among escherichia coli strains for space and resources
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093
work_keys_str_mv AT paquettesarahjo competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources
AT zaheerrahat competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources
AT stanfordkim competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources
AT thomasjames competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources
AT reutertim competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources