Cargando…
Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjec...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093 |
_version_ | 1783384044388483072 |
---|---|
author | Paquette, Sarah-Jo Zaheer, Rahat Stanford, Kim Thomas, James Reuter, Tim |
author_facet | Paquette, Sarah-Jo Zaheer, Rahat Stanford, Kim Thomas, James Reuter, Tim |
author_sort | Paquette, Sarah-Jo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjected to competition pressures due to limited space and resources but they use various strategies to compete in natural environments. Our objective was to evaluate non-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from cattle feces for their ability to out-compete STEC. Competitive fitness of non-pathogenic E. coli against STEC were assessed in competitions using liquid, agar, and nutrient limiting assays. Winners were determined by enumeration using O-serogroup specific quantitative PCR or a semi-quantitative grading. Initial liquid competitions identified two strong non-pathogenic competitors (O103F and O26E) capable of eliminating various STEC including O157 and O111. The strain O103F was dominant across permeable physical barriers for all tested E. coli and STEC strains indicating the diffusion of antimicrobial molecules. In direct contact and even with temporal disadvantages, O103F out-competed STEC O157E. The results suggest that O103F or the diffusible molecule(s) it produces have a potential to be used as an alternative STEC mitigation strategy, either in medicine or the food industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6313926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63139262019-01-07 Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources Paquette, Sarah-Jo Zaheer, Rahat Stanford, Kim Thomas, James Reuter, Tim Vet Sci Article Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a subgroup of E. coli causing human diseases. Methods to control STEC in livestock and humans are limited. These and other emerging pathogens are a global concern and novel mitigation strategies are required. Habitats populated by bacteria are subjected to competition pressures due to limited space and resources but they use various strategies to compete in natural environments. Our objective was to evaluate non-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from cattle feces for their ability to out-compete STEC. Competitive fitness of non-pathogenic E. coli against STEC were assessed in competitions using liquid, agar, and nutrient limiting assays. Winners were determined by enumeration using O-serogroup specific quantitative PCR or a semi-quantitative grading. Initial liquid competitions identified two strong non-pathogenic competitors (O103F and O26E) capable of eliminating various STEC including O157 and O111. The strain O103F was dominant across permeable physical barriers for all tested E. coli and STEC strains indicating the diffusion of antimicrobial molecules. In direct contact and even with temporal disadvantages, O103F out-competed STEC O157E. The results suggest that O103F or the diffusible molecule(s) it produces have a potential to be used as an alternative STEC mitigation strategy, either in medicine or the food industry. MDPI 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6313926/ /pubmed/30400157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Paquette, Sarah-Jo Zaheer, Rahat Stanford, Kim Thomas, James Reuter, Tim Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title | Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title_full | Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title_fullStr | Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title_full_unstemmed | Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title_short | Competition among Escherichia coli Strains for Space and Resources |
title_sort | competition among escherichia coli strains for space and resources |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci5040093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paquettesarahjo competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources AT zaheerrahat competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources AT stanfordkim competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources AT thomasjames competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources AT reutertim competitionamongescherichiacolistrainsforspaceandresources |