Cargando…
A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27 |
_version_ | 1783384064239075328 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Jessica Hui, Flora Hadoux, Xavier Sarossy, Marc van Wijngaarden, Peter Coote, Michael Crowston, Jonathan G. |
author_facet | Tang, Jessica Hui, Flora Hadoux, Xavier Sarossy, Marc van Wijngaarden, Peter Coote, Michael Crowston, Jonathan G. |
author_sort | Tang, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants were recruited. Photopic ERGs were recorded with sensor strip and DTL electrodes in random order using the LKC RETeval device. Stimuli consisted of brief, red flashes (1.7 cd.s/m(2)) on a blue background (photopic 10 cd/m(2)). The PhNR amplitude was measured from baseline to trough and also expressed as a ratio over the b-wave amplitude. RESULTS: The sensor strip-recorded PhNR amplitude was significantly attenuated (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 4.8 ± 2.1 vs. 12.7 ± 4.8 μV, P < 0.0001), with lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; 5.5 ± 2.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9, P < 0.0001), and a trend toward a larger PhNR/b-wave ratio compared with DTL electrodes. The PhNR amplitude, implicit time and PhNR/b-wave ratio correlated with visual field mean light sensitivity, although this fell short of significance for the sensor strip recorded PhNR amplitude. The electrodes demonstrated similar intersession repeatability with a coefficient of repeatability of ±27% and ±28% for the DTL and sensor strip, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor strip electrodes are a viable alternative for recording reproducible PhNRs, especially when values are normalized to the b-wave. However, DTL electrodes should be considered in cases of attenuated PhNR, or in elevated noise levels, due to its better signal-to-noise quality. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Sensor strip electrodes can simplify PhNR recordings in the clinic, potentially eliminating the need for an experienced operator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6314057 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63140572019-01-07 A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response Tang, Jessica Hui, Flora Hadoux, Xavier Sarossy, Marc van Wijngaarden, Peter Coote, Michael Crowston, Jonathan G. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants were recruited. Photopic ERGs were recorded with sensor strip and DTL electrodes in random order using the LKC RETeval device. Stimuli consisted of brief, red flashes (1.7 cd.s/m(2)) on a blue background (photopic 10 cd/m(2)). The PhNR amplitude was measured from baseline to trough and also expressed as a ratio over the b-wave amplitude. RESULTS: The sensor strip-recorded PhNR amplitude was significantly attenuated (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 4.8 ± 2.1 vs. 12.7 ± 4.8 μV, P < 0.0001), with lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; 5.5 ± 2.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9, P < 0.0001), and a trend toward a larger PhNR/b-wave ratio compared with DTL electrodes. The PhNR amplitude, implicit time and PhNR/b-wave ratio correlated with visual field mean light sensitivity, although this fell short of significance for the sensor strip recorded PhNR amplitude. The electrodes demonstrated similar intersession repeatability with a coefficient of repeatability of ±27% and ±28% for the DTL and sensor strip, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor strip electrodes are a viable alternative for recording reproducible PhNRs, especially when values are normalized to the b-wave. However, DTL electrodes should be considered in cases of attenuated PhNR, or in elevated noise levels, due to its better signal-to-noise quality. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Sensor strip electrodes can simplify PhNR recordings in the clinic, potentially eliminating the need for an experienced operator. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6314057/ /pubmed/30619647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Tang, Jessica Hui, Flora Hadoux, Xavier Sarossy, Marc van Wijngaarden, Peter Coote, Michael Crowston, Jonathan G. A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title | A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title_full | A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title_short | A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response |
title_sort | comparison of the reteval sensor strip and dtl electrode for recording the photopic negative response |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314057/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangjessica acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT huiflora acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT hadouxxavier acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT sarossymarc acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT vanwijngaardenpeter acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT cootemichael acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT crowstonjonathang acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT tangjessica comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT huiflora comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT hadouxxavier comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT sarossymarc comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT vanwijngaardenpeter comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT cootemichael comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse AT crowstonjonathang comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse |