Cargando…

A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response

PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Jessica, Hui, Flora, Hadoux, Xavier, Sarossy, Marc, van Wijngaarden, Peter, Coote, Michael, Crowston, Jonathan G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27
_version_ 1783384064239075328
author Tang, Jessica
Hui, Flora
Hadoux, Xavier
Sarossy, Marc
van Wijngaarden, Peter
Coote, Michael
Crowston, Jonathan G.
author_facet Tang, Jessica
Hui, Flora
Hadoux, Xavier
Sarossy, Marc
van Wijngaarden, Peter
Coote, Michael
Crowston, Jonathan G.
author_sort Tang, Jessica
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants were recruited. Photopic ERGs were recorded with sensor strip and DTL electrodes in random order using the LKC RETeval device. Stimuli consisted of brief, red flashes (1.7 cd.s/m(2)) on a blue background (photopic 10 cd/m(2)). The PhNR amplitude was measured from baseline to trough and also expressed as a ratio over the b-wave amplitude. RESULTS: The sensor strip-recorded PhNR amplitude was significantly attenuated (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 4.8 ± 2.1 vs. 12.7 ± 4.8 μV, P < 0.0001), with lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; 5.5 ± 2.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9, P < 0.0001), and a trend toward a larger PhNR/b-wave ratio compared with DTL electrodes. The PhNR amplitude, implicit time and PhNR/b-wave ratio correlated with visual field mean light sensitivity, although this fell short of significance for the sensor strip recorded PhNR amplitude. The electrodes demonstrated similar intersession repeatability with a coefficient of repeatability of ±27% and ±28% for the DTL and sensor strip, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor strip electrodes are a viable alternative for recording reproducible PhNRs, especially when values are normalized to the b-wave. However, DTL electrodes should be considered in cases of attenuated PhNR, or in elevated noise levels, due to its better signal-to-noise quality. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Sensor strip electrodes can simplify PhNR recordings in the clinic, potentially eliminating the need for an experienced operator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63140572019-01-07 A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response Tang, Jessica Hui, Flora Hadoux, Xavier Sarossy, Marc van Wijngaarden, Peter Coote, Michael Crowston, Jonathan G. Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: To compare the RETeval sensor strip and Dawson-Trick-Litzkow (DTL) electrodes for recording the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a portable electroretinogram (ERG) device in eyes with and without glaucoma. METHODS: Twenty-six control and 31 glaucoma or glaucoma-suspect participants were recruited. Photopic ERGs were recorded with sensor strip and DTL electrodes in random order using the LKC RETeval device. Stimuli consisted of brief, red flashes (1.7 cd.s/m(2)) on a blue background (photopic 10 cd/m(2)). The PhNR amplitude was measured from baseline to trough and also expressed as a ratio over the b-wave amplitude. RESULTS: The sensor strip-recorded PhNR amplitude was significantly attenuated (mean ± standard deviation [SD], 4.8 ± 2.1 vs. 12.7 ± 4.8 μV, P < 0.0001), with lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; 5.5 ± 2.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9, P < 0.0001), and a trend toward a larger PhNR/b-wave ratio compared with DTL electrodes. The PhNR amplitude, implicit time and PhNR/b-wave ratio correlated with visual field mean light sensitivity, although this fell short of significance for the sensor strip recorded PhNR amplitude. The electrodes demonstrated similar intersession repeatability with a coefficient of repeatability of ±27% and ±28% for the DTL and sensor strip, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sensor strip electrodes are a viable alternative for recording reproducible PhNRs, especially when values are normalized to the b-wave. However, DTL electrodes should be considered in cases of attenuated PhNR, or in elevated noise levels, due to its better signal-to-noise quality. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Sensor strip electrodes can simplify PhNR recordings in the clinic, potentially eliminating the need for an experienced operator. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6314057/ /pubmed/30619647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Tang, Jessica
Hui, Flora
Hadoux, Xavier
Sarossy, Marc
van Wijngaarden, Peter
Coote, Michael
Crowston, Jonathan G.
A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title_full A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title_fullStr A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title_short A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response
title_sort comparison of the reteval sensor strip and dtl electrode for recording the photopic negative response
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.27
work_keys_str_mv AT tangjessica acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT huiflora acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT hadouxxavier acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT sarossymarc acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT vanwijngaardenpeter acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT cootemichael acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT crowstonjonathang acomparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT tangjessica comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT huiflora comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT hadouxxavier comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT sarossymarc comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT vanwijngaardenpeter comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT cootemichael comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse
AT crowstonjonathang comparisonoftheretevalsensorstripanddtlelectrodeforrecordingthephotopicnegativeresponse