Cargando…

Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of vessel density calculations using different binarization methods obtained via two commercially available swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) systems. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were imaged using two swept-source optical coheren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoji, Takuhei, Yoshikawa, Yuji, Kanno, Junji, Ishii, Hirokazu, Ibuki, Hisashi, Ozaki, Kimitake, Kimura, Itaru, Shinoda, Kei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.31
_version_ 1783384064700448768
author Shoji, Takuhei
Yoshikawa, Yuji
Kanno, Junji
Ishii, Hirokazu
Ibuki, Hisashi
Ozaki, Kimitake
Kimura, Itaru
Shinoda, Kei
author_facet Shoji, Takuhei
Yoshikawa, Yuji
Kanno, Junji
Ishii, Hirokazu
Ibuki, Hisashi
Ozaki, Kimitake
Kimura, Itaru
Shinoda, Kei
author_sort Shoji, Takuhei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of vessel density calculations using different binarization methods obtained via two commercially available swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) systems. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were imaged using two swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) devices, PLEXElite and Triton. SS-OCTA examinations were performed using a 3 × 3-mm volume scan pattern centered on the fovea. A total of six methods were used for binarization in ImageJ, two global thresholding and four local adaptive thresholding methods. Resultant vessel density values were compared between the instruments and binarization methods. Images for 60 eyes from 30 healthy subjects were assessed by two reviewers who were blinded to the scanning system used. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes were excluded due to poor image quality (17 eyes from Triton, 4 eyes from PLEXElite, and 1 eye from both instruments, P = 0.003). A final 38 eyes from 23 subjects were eligible for analysis. Each binarization method and instrument led to different median values. The coefficients of variation for vessel density measurements ranged from 0.3% to 2.3% and 0.6% to 4.7% for the PLEXElite and Triton, respectively. Local adaptive thresholding methods revealed higher reproducibility than did global thresholding methods for both devices. CONCLUSIONS: Macular scans with both SS-OCTA instruments showed good reproducibility for vessel density measurements. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton. These findings will inform the selection of proper binarization methods for the clinical detection of vascular diseases affecting the central retina. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The reproducibility for macular vessel measurements with SS-OCTA instruments was good. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63140592019-01-07 Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems Shoji, Takuhei Yoshikawa, Yuji Kanno, Junji Ishii, Hirokazu Ibuki, Hisashi Ozaki, Kimitake Kimura, Itaru Shinoda, Kei Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of vessel density calculations using different binarization methods obtained via two commercially available swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) systems. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were imaged using two swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) devices, PLEXElite and Triton. SS-OCTA examinations were performed using a 3 × 3-mm volume scan pattern centered on the fovea. A total of six methods were used for binarization in ImageJ, two global thresholding and four local adaptive thresholding methods. Resultant vessel density values were compared between the instruments and binarization methods. Images for 60 eyes from 30 healthy subjects were assessed by two reviewers who were blinded to the scanning system used. RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes were excluded due to poor image quality (17 eyes from Triton, 4 eyes from PLEXElite, and 1 eye from both instruments, P = 0.003). A final 38 eyes from 23 subjects were eligible for analysis. Each binarization method and instrument led to different median values. The coefficients of variation for vessel density measurements ranged from 0.3% to 2.3% and 0.6% to 4.7% for the PLEXElite and Triton, respectively. Local adaptive thresholding methods revealed higher reproducibility than did global thresholding methods for both devices. CONCLUSIONS: Macular scans with both SS-OCTA instruments showed good reproducibility for vessel density measurements. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton. These findings will inform the selection of proper binarization methods for the clinical detection of vascular diseases affecting the central retina. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The reproducibility for macular vessel measurements with SS-OCTA instruments was good. PLEXElite recorded fewer poor images and had higher reproducibility than did Triton. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6314059/ /pubmed/30619651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.31 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Shoji, Takuhei
Yoshikawa, Yuji
Kanno, Junji
Ishii, Hirokazu
Ibuki, Hisashi
Ozaki, Kimitake
Kimura, Itaru
Shinoda, Kei
Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title_full Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title_short Reproducibility of Macular Vessel Density Calculations Via Imaging With Two Different Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Systems
title_sort reproducibility of macular vessel density calculations via imaging with two different swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography systems
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.6.31
work_keys_str_mv AT shojitakuhei reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT yoshikawayuji reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT kannojunji reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT ishiihirokazu reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT ibukihisashi reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT ozakikimitake reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT kimuraitaru reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems
AT shinodakei reproducibilityofmacularvesseldensitycalculationsviaimagingwithtwodifferentsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyangiographysystems