Cargando…

Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadeem, Baby, Bacha, Raham, Gilani, Syed Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662152
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18
_version_ 1783384070747586560
author Nadeem, Baby
Bacha, Raham
Gilani, Syed Amir
author_facet Nadeem, Baby
Bacha, Raham
Gilani, Syed Amir
author_sort Nadeem, Baby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure even in routine pelvic and abdominal ultrasound examination. During our routine examination, we can measure abdominal fat and inform the patient about his/her health state regarding obesity. It was a hypothesis that increases in abdominal subcutaneous fat will increase in BMI. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to correlate subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound with BMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study, which was performed in Gilani ultrasound center, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 384 participants were included with simple random sampling technique. Individuals of 16–60 years age of both genders were included in that study. Pregnant ladies, athletes, children, and elderly participants were not included in that study. Toshiba (Xario) and Mindray (Z5) ultrasound machine were used for subcutaneous fats measurement. Participants were scanned in the supine position. Subcutaneous fats were measured on the suprapubic region in three different trials. Compression was avoided. Compression artifacts were avoided by applying more quantity of gel between transducer and skin. Stadiometer was used for the measurement of weight and height. To calculate BMI, Quetelet index was used. BMI was calculated with that formula BMI = weight (kg) divided by height (m(2)). RESULTS: The result was made by calculation of mean and standard deviation. We calculated Pearson correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound at the suprapubic region. It showed a significant high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat (P = 0.0000 which is < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess subcutaneous fat. It can be a predictor of obesity like BMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63141012019-01-18 Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index Nadeem, Baby Bacha, Raham Gilani, Syed Amir J Med Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure even in routine pelvic and abdominal ultrasound examination. During our routine examination, we can measure abdominal fat and inform the patient about his/her health state regarding obesity. It was a hypothesis that increases in abdominal subcutaneous fat will increase in BMI. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to correlate subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound with BMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study, which was performed in Gilani ultrasound center, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 384 participants were included with simple random sampling technique. Individuals of 16–60 years age of both genders were included in that study. Pregnant ladies, athletes, children, and elderly participants were not included in that study. Toshiba (Xario) and Mindray (Z5) ultrasound machine were used for subcutaneous fats measurement. Participants were scanned in the supine position. Subcutaneous fats were measured on the suprapubic region in three different trials. Compression was avoided. Compression artifacts were avoided by applying more quantity of gel between transducer and skin. Stadiometer was used for the measurement of weight and height. To calculate BMI, Quetelet index was used. BMI was calculated with that formula BMI = weight (kg) divided by height (m(2)). RESULTS: The result was made by calculation of mean and standard deviation. We calculated Pearson correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound at the suprapubic region. It showed a significant high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat (P = 0.0000 which is < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess subcutaneous fat. It can be a predictor of obesity like BMI. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6314101/ /pubmed/30662152 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nadeem, Baby
Bacha, Raham
Gilani, Syed Amir
Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title_full Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title_fullStr Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title_short Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
title_sort correlation of subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound with body mass index
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662152
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeembaby correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex
AT bacharaham correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex
AT gilanisyedamir correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex