Cargando…
Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index
BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662152 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18 |
_version_ | 1783384070747586560 |
---|---|
author | Nadeem, Baby Bacha, Raham Gilani, Syed Amir |
author_facet | Nadeem, Baby Bacha, Raham Gilani, Syed Amir |
author_sort | Nadeem, Baby |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure even in routine pelvic and abdominal ultrasound examination. During our routine examination, we can measure abdominal fat and inform the patient about his/her health state regarding obesity. It was a hypothesis that increases in abdominal subcutaneous fat will increase in BMI. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to correlate subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound with BMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study, which was performed in Gilani ultrasound center, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 384 participants were included with simple random sampling technique. Individuals of 16–60 years age of both genders were included in that study. Pregnant ladies, athletes, children, and elderly participants were not included in that study. Toshiba (Xario) and Mindray (Z5) ultrasound machine were used for subcutaneous fats measurement. Participants were scanned in the supine position. Subcutaneous fats were measured on the suprapubic region in three different trials. Compression was avoided. Compression artifacts were avoided by applying more quantity of gel between transducer and skin. Stadiometer was used for the measurement of weight and height. To calculate BMI, Quetelet index was used. BMI was calculated with that formula BMI = weight (kg) divided by height (m(2)). RESULTS: The result was made by calculation of mean and standard deviation. We calculated Pearson correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound at the suprapubic region. It showed a significant high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat (P = 0.0000 which is < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess subcutaneous fat. It can be a predictor of obesity like BMI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6314101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63141012019-01-18 Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index Nadeem, Baby Bacha, Raham Gilani, Syed Amir J Med Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is used for the assessment of obesity and overweight worldwide. When body fat is increased BMI is also increased. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess body fat. We have selected only one suprapubic region for the assessment of fat which is very easy to measure even in routine pelvic and abdominal ultrasound examination. During our routine examination, we can measure abdominal fat and inform the patient about his/her health state regarding obesity. It was a hypothesis that increases in abdominal subcutaneous fat will increase in BMI. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to correlate subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound with BMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study, which was performed in Gilani ultrasound center, Lahore, Pakistan. A total of 384 participants were included with simple random sampling technique. Individuals of 16–60 years age of both genders were included in that study. Pregnant ladies, athletes, children, and elderly participants were not included in that study. Toshiba (Xario) and Mindray (Z5) ultrasound machine were used for subcutaneous fats measurement. Participants were scanned in the supine position. Subcutaneous fats were measured on the suprapubic region in three different trials. Compression was avoided. Compression artifacts were avoided by applying more quantity of gel between transducer and skin. Stadiometer was used for the measurement of weight and height. To calculate BMI, Quetelet index was used. BMI was calculated with that formula BMI = weight (kg) divided by height (m(2)). RESULTS: The result was made by calculation of mean and standard deviation. We calculated Pearson correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fats measured on ultrasound at the suprapubic region. It showed a significant high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat (P = 0.0000 which is < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significantly high correlation between BMI and subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound. Ultrasound is a reliable method to assess subcutaneous fat. It can be a predictor of obesity like BMI. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6314101/ /pubmed/30662152 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Medical Ultrasound http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nadeem, Baby Bacha, Raham Gilani, Syed Amir Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title | Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title_full | Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title_fullStr | Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title_short | Correlation of Subcutaneous Fat Measured on Ultrasound with Body Mass Index |
title_sort | correlation of subcutaneous fat measured on ultrasound with body mass index |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662152 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_34_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadeembaby correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex AT bacharaham correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex AT gilanisyedamir correlationofsubcutaneousfatmeasuredonultrasoundwithbodymassindex |