Cargando…

Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts

AIM AND SCOPE: A Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging technique (GEPCI) is a post-processing method, which can be used to obtain quantitative T2* values and generate multiple synthetic contrasts from a single acquisition. However, scan duration and image reconstruction from k-space data present cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruuth, Riikka, Kuusela, Linda, Mäkelä, Teemu, Melkas, Susanna, Korvenoja, Antti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.006
_version_ 1783384071194279936
author Ruuth, Riikka
Kuusela, Linda
Mäkelä, Teemu
Melkas, Susanna
Korvenoja, Antti
author_facet Ruuth, Riikka
Kuusela, Linda
Mäkelä, Teemu
Melkas, Susanna
Korvenoja, Antti
author_sort Ruuth, Riikka
collection PubMed
description AIM AND SCOPE: A Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging technique (GEPCI) is a post-processing method, which can be used to obtain quantitative T2* values and generate multiple synthetic contrasts from a single acquisition. However, scan duration and image reconstruction from k-space data present challenges in a clinical workflow. This study aimed at optimizing image reconstruction and acquisition duration to facilitate a post-processing method for synthetic image contrast creation in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consists of tests using the American College of Radiology (ACR) image quality phantom, two healthy volunteers, four mild traumatic brain injury patients and four small vessel disease patients. The measurements were carried out on a 3.0 T scanner with multiple echo times. Reconstruction from k-space data and DICOM data with two different coil-channel combination modes were investigated. Partial Fourier techniques were tested to optimize the scanning time. CONCLUSIONS: Sum of squares coil-channel combination produced artifacts in phase images, but images created with adaptive combination were artifact-free. The voxel-wise median signed difference of T2* between the vendor’s adaptive channel combination and k-space reconstruction modes was 2.9 ± 0.7 ms for white matter and 4.5 ± 0.6 ms for gray matter. Relative white matter/gray matter contrast of all synthetic images and contrast-to-noise ratio of synthetic T1-weighted images were almost equal between reconstruction modes. Our results indicate that synthetic contrasts can be generated from the vendor’s DICOM data with the adaptive combination mode without affecting the quantitative T2* values or white matter/gray matter contrast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63141032019-01-07 Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts Ruuth, Riikka Kuusela, Linda Mäkelä, Teemu Melkas, Susanna Korvenoja, Antti Eur J Radiol Open Article AIM AND SCOPE: A Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging technique (GEPCI) is a post-processing method, which can be used to obtain quantitative T2* values and generate multiple synthetic contrasts from a single acquisition. However, scan duration and image reconstruction from k-space data present challenges in a clinical workflow. This study aimed at optimizing image reconstruction and acquisition duration to facilitate a post-processing method for synthetic image contrast creation in clinical settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consists of tests using the American College of Radiology (ACR) image quality phantom, two healthy volunteers, four mild traumatic brain injury patients and four small vessel disease patients. The measurements were carried out on a 3.0 T scanner with multiple echo times. Reconstruction from k-space data and DICOM data with two different coil-channel combination modes were investigated. Partial Fourier techniques were tested to optimize the scanning time. CONCLUSIONS: Sum of squares coil-channel combination produced artifacts in phase images, but images created with adaptive combination were artifact-free. The voxel-wise median signed difference of T2* between the vendor’s adaptive channel combination and k-space reconstruction modes was 2.9 ± 0.7 ms for white matter and 4.5 ± 0.6 ms for gray matter. Relative white matter/gray matter contrast of all synthetic images and contrast-to-noise ratio of synthetic T1-weighted images were almost equal between reconstruction modes. Our results indicate that synthetic contrasts can be generated from the vendor’s DICOM data with the adaptive combination mode without affecting the quantitative T2* values or white matter/gray matter contrast. Elsevier 2018-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6314103/ /pubmed/30619919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruuth, Riikka
Kuusela, Linda
Mäkelä, Teemu
Melkas, Susanna
Korvenoja, Antti
Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title_full Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title_fullStr Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title_short Comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative T2* maps and synthetic contrasts
title_sort comparison of reconstruction and acquisition choices for quantitative t2* maps and synthetic contrasts
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30619919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT ruuthriikka comparisonofreconstructionandacquisitionchoicesforquantitativet2mapsandsyntheticcontrasts
AT kuuselalinda comparisonofreconstructionandacquisitionchoicesforquantitativet2mapsandsyntheticcontrasts
AT makelateemu comparisonofreconstructionandacquisitionchoicesforquantitativet2mapsandsyntheticcontrasts
AT melkassusanna comparisonofreconstructionandacquisitionchoicesforquantitativet2mapsandsyntheticcontrasts
AT korvenojaantti comparisonofreconstructionandacquisitionchoicesforquantitativet2mapsandsyntheticcontrasts