Cargando…
Probing human sperm metabolism using (13)C-magnetic resonance spectroscopy
STUDY QUESTION: Can (13)C-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) of selected metabolites provide useful information about human sperm metabolism and how glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation are used by different sperm populations? SUMMARY ANSWER: Sperm populations, prepared by density gradient cen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30395244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay046 |
Sumario: | STUDY QUESTION: Can (13)C-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) of selected metabolites provide useful information about human sperm metabolism and how glycolysis or oxidative phosphorylation are used by different sperm populations? SUMMARY ANSWER: Sperm populations, prepared by density gradient centrifugation (DGC) and incubated with either (13)C(u)-glucose, (13)C(u)-fructose or (13)C(1)-pyruvate, showed consistent evidence of metabolism generating principally lactate and more intermittently bicarbonate, and significantly more lactate was produced from (13)C(u)-glucose by vital or motile sperm recovered from the 40/80% interface compared to those from the pellet, which could not be accounted for by differences in the non-sperm cells present. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies have focused on CO(2) or other specific metabolite production by human sperm and there remains considerable debate about whether glycolysis and/or oxidative phosphorylation is the more important pathway for ATP production in sperm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Sperm populations were prepared by DGC and subjected to (13)C-MRS to answer the following questions. (i) Is it possible to detect human sperm metabolism of (13)C substrates implicated in energy generation? (ii) What are the kinetics of such reactions? (iii) Do different sperm populations (e.g. ‘80%’ pellet sperm and ‘40%’ interface sperm) utilise substrates in the same way? Semen samples from 97 men were used in these experiments; 52 were used in parallel for aims (i) and (ii) and 45 were used for aim (iii). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Sperm populations were prepared from ejaculates of healthy men using a Percoll/Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) DGC and then incubated with a range of (13)C-labelled substrates ((13)C(u)-glucose, (13)C(u)-fructose, (13)C(1)-pyruvate, (13)C(1)-butyrate, (13)C(3)-lactate, (13)C(2,4)-D-3-hydroxybutyrate, (13)C(5)-l-glutamate, (13)C(1,2)-glycine or (13)C(u)-galactose) along with penicillin/streptomycin antibiotic at 37°C for 4 h, 24 h or over 48 h for an estimated rate constant. Sperm concentration, vitality and motility were measured and, for a subset of experiments, non-sperm cell concentration was determined. A 9.4 T magnetic resonance spectrometer was used to acquire 1D (13)C, inverse gated (1)H decoupled, MRS spectra. Spectrum processing was carried out using spectrometer software and Matlab scripts to determine peak integrals for each spectrum. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: (13)C(u)-glucose, (13)C(u)-fructose and (13)C(1)-pyruvate were consistently converted into lactate and, to a lesser extent, bicarbonate. There was a significant correlation between sperm concentration and lactate peak size for (13)C(u)-glucose and (13)C(u)-fructose, which was not observed for (13)C(1)-pyruvate. The lactate peak did not correlate with the non-sperm cell concentration up to 6.9 × 10(6)/ml. The concentration of (13)C(u)-glucose, (13)C(u)-fructose or (13)C(1)-pyruvate (1.8, 3.6, 7.2 or 14.4 mM) had no influence on the size of the observed lactate peak over a 4 h incubation. The rate of conversion of (13)C(1)-pyruvate to lactate was approximately three times faster than for (13)C(u)-glucose or (13)C(u)-fructose which were not significantly different from each other. After incubating for 4 h, the utilisation of (13)C(u)-glucose, (13)C(u)-fructose or (13)C(1)-pyruvate by sperm from the ‘40%’ interface of the DGC was no different from those from the pellet when normalised to total sperm concentration. However, after normalising by either the vital or motile sperm concentration, there was a significant increase in conversion of (13)C(u)-glucose to lactate by ‘40%’ interface sperm compared to pellet sperm (Vital = 3.3 ± 0.30 × 10(6) vs 2.0 ± 0.21 × 10(6); P = 0.0049; Motile = 7.0 ± 0.75 × 10(6) vs 4.8 ± 0.13 × 10(6); P = 0.0032. Mann–Whitney test P < 0.0055 taken as statistically significant). No significant differences were observed for (13)C(u)-fructose or (13)C(1)-pyruvate. LARGE SCALE DATA: Not applicable. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Only (13)C labelled metabolites that accumulate to a sufficiently high concentration can be observed by (13)C MRS. For this reason, intermediary molecules in the metabolic chain are difficult to observe without trapping the molecule at a particular step using inhibitors. Non-sperm cell concentration was typical of the general population and no link was found between these cells and the magnitude of the (13)C-lactate peak. However, it is possible that higher concentrations than the maximum observed (6.9 × 10(6)/ml) may contribute to exogenous substrate metabolism in other experiments. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: (13)C-MRS can provide information on the underlying metabolism of multiple pathways in live sperm. Dysfunction in sperm metabolism, as a result of either impaired enzymes of lack of metabolisable substrate, could be detected in sperm by a non-destructive assay, potentially offering new treatment options to improve overall sperm quality and outcomes for reproduction. STUDY FUNDING AND COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council Grant MR/M010473/1. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. |
---|