Cargando…

Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline

INTRODUCTION: This guideline was developed to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on prosthetic knee selection for unilateral amputation at the knee disarticulation or transfemoral level. METHODS: The guideline is based upon the best available evidence as it relates to prosthet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stevens, Phillip M., Wurdeman, Shane R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000214
_version_ 1783384106831183872
author Stevens, Phillip M.
Wurdeman, Shane R.
author_facet Stevens, Phillip M.
Wurdeman, Shane R.
author_sort Stevens, Phillip M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This guideline was developed to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on prosthetic knee selection for unilateral amputation at the knee disarticulation or transfemoral level. METHODS: The guideline is based upon the best available evidence as it relates to prosthetic knee selection after unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. Recommendations are drawn from systematic review, meta-analysis, and additional published practice guidelines. RESULTS: Recommendation 1. Fluid knee benefits and indications: Knees with hydraulic or pneumatic swing resistance are indicated for active walkers, permitting increased walking comfort, speed, and symmetry. Recommendation 2. Microprocessor knee benefits: Compared with nonmicroprocessor knees: a) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to reduce stumbles, falls, and associated frustrations as well as the cognitive demands of ambulation. b) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase confidence while walking, self-reported mobility, satisfaction, well-being, and quality of life. c) With respect to physical performance indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase self-selected walking speed, walking speed on uneven terrain, and metabolic efficiency during gait. Recommendation 3. Microprocessor knee equivalence: Given the comparable values observed with the use of microprocessor and nonmicroprocessor knees with regard to daily step counts, temporal and spatial gait symmetry, self-reported general health, and total costs of prosthetic rehabilitation, these parameters may not be primary indications in prosthetic knee joint selection. Recommendation 4. Microprocessor knees for limited community ambulators: Among limited community ambulators, microprocessor knees are indicated to enable increases in level ground walking speed and walking speed on uneven terrain while substantially reducing uncontrolled falls and increasing both measured and perceived balance. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical practice guidelines summarize the available evidence related to prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. The noted clinical practice guidelines are meant to serve on as "guides." They may not apply to all patients and clinical situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63145122019-01-18 Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline Stevens, Phillip M. Wurdeman, Shane R. J Prosthet Orthot CME Article INTRODUCTION: This guideline was developed to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on prosthetic knee selection for unilateral amputation at the knee disarticulation or transfemoral level. METHODS: The guideline is based upon the best available evidence as it relates to prosthetic knee selection after unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. Recommendations are drawn from systematic review, meta-analysis, and additional published practice guidelines. RESULTS: Recommendation 1. Fluid knee benefits and indications: Knees with hydraulic or pneumatic swing resistance are indicated for active walkers, permitting increased walking comfort, speed, and symmetry. Recommendation 2. Microprocessor knee benefits: Compared with nonmicroprocessor knees: a) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to reduce stumbles, falls, and associated frustrations as well as the cognitive demands of ambulation. b) With respect to self-report indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase confidence while walking, self-reported mobility, satisfaction, well-being, and quality of life. c) With respect to physical performance indices and measures, microprocessor knees are indicated to increase self-selected walking speed, walking speed on uneven terrain, and metabolic efficiency during gait. Recommendation 3. Microprocessor knee equivalence: Given the comparable values observed with the use of microprocessor and nonmicroprocessor knees with regard to daily step counts, temporal and spatial gait symmetry, self-reported general health, and total costs of prosthetic rehabilitation, these parameters may not be primary indications in prosthetic knee joint selection. Recommendation 4. Microprocessor knees for limited community ambulators: Among limited community ambulators, microprocessor knees are indicated to enable increases in level ground walking speed and walking speed on uneven terrain while substantially reducing uncontrolled falls and increasing both measured and perceived balance. CONCLUSIONS: These clinical practice guidelines summarize the available evidence related to prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral knee disarticulation or transfemoral amputation. The noted clinical practice guidelines are meant to serve on as "guides." They may not apply to all patients and clinical situations. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-01 2018-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6314512/ /pubmed/30662248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000214 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle CME Article
Stevens, Phillip M.
Wurdeman, Shane R.
Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title_full Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title_fullStr Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title_full_unstemmed Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title_short Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline
title_sort prosthetic knee selection for individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation: a clinical practice guideline
topic CME Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000214
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensphillipm prosthetickneeselectionforindividualswithunilateraltransfemoralamputationaclinicalpracticeguideline
AT wurdemanshaner prosthetickneeselectionforindividualswithunilateraltransfemoralamputationaclinicalpracticeguideline