Cargando…
Poverty and a child’s height development during early childhood: A double disadvantage? A study of the 2006–2009 birth cohorts in Flanders
INTRODUCTION: Poverty is a well-known risk factor for a child’s health and development. This paper aimed to establish whether poverty negatively affected both intra-uterine growth and early childhood growth, i.e., whether children facing poverty were at a double disadvantage. METHODS: For this study...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30601853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209170 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Poverty is a well-known risk factor for a child’s health and development. This paper aimed to establish whether poverty negatively affected both intra-uterine growth and early childhood growth, i.e., whether children facing poverty were at a double disadvantage. METHODS: For this study, we made use of routinely collected data on child development throughout early childhood from the 2006–2009 birth cohorts in Kind & Gezin’s Ikaros database collected during 2,605,975 consultations with 273,935 children from birth to 730 days old. Indicators for child development at birth were gestational age and height-at-birth. A standardized height-for-age indicator captured height development throughout early childhood. A multidimensional indicator measured the risk of poverty. For the analysis of development at birth, we used linear and logistic regression; for the analysis of height development during early childhood, we estimated linear and logistic growth curve models. RESULTS: The risk of poverty negatively affected both gestational age and height-at-birth. Throughout early childhood, we observed a negative relation between the risk of poverty and height-for-age indicators. However, the effect varied throughout childhood. Children at risk of poverty (over)compensated for their smaller stature at birth, and between ages 6 and 18 months, approximately, the negative effects of risk of poverty decreased substantially or disappeared. However, towards the end of the period studied, children born in households at risk of poverty started to lag again in height development. CONCLUSION: This study found that the risk of poverty indeed negatively affected a child’s growth, both in utero and in early childhood. However, the results suggest that developmental lags later in childhood were not merely an extension of such lags at birth. |
---|