Cargando…
Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8 |
_version_ | 1783384141197213696 |
---|---|
author | van Breugel, Floris Huda, Ainul Dickinson, Michael H. |
author_facet | van Breugel, Floris Huda, Ainul Dickinson, Michael H. |
author_sort | van Breugel, Floris |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation, laboratory experiments suggest that walking flies avoid CO(2)(7–12). Here, we resolve this paradox by showing that both flying and walking Drosophila find CO(2) attractive, but only when in an active state associated with foraging. Aversion at low activity levels may be an adaptation to avoid CO(2)-seeking-parasites, or succumbing to respiratory acidosis in the presence of high concentrations of CO(2) that exist in nature(13,14). In contrast to CO(2), flies are attracted to ethanol in all behavioral states, and invest twice the time searching near ethanol compared to CO(2). These behavioral differences reflect the fact that whereas CO(2) is generated by many natural processes, ethanol is a unique signature of yeast fermentation. Using genetic tools, we determined that the evolutionarily ancient ionotropic co-receptor IR25a is required for CO(2) attraction, and that the receptors necessary for CO(2) avoidance are not involved. Our study lays the foundation for future research to determine the neural circuits underlying both state- and odorant- dependent decision making in Drosophila. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6314688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63146882019-05-21 Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila van Breugel, Floris Huda, Ainul Dickinson, Michael H. Nature Article Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation, laboratory experiments suggest that walking flies avoid CO(2)(7–12). Here, we resolve this paradox by showing that both flying and walking Drosophila find CO(2) attractive, but only when in an active state associated with foraging. Aversion at low activity levels may be an adaptation to avoid CO(2)-seeking-parasites, or succumbing to respiratory acidosis in the presence of high concentrations of CO(2) that exist in nature(13,14). In contrast to CO(2), flies are attracted to ethanol in all behavioral states, and invest twice the time searching near ethanol compared to CO(2). These behavioral differences reflect the fact that whereas CO(2) is generated by many natural processes, ethanol is a unique signature of yeast fermentation. Using genetic tools, we determined that the evolutionarily ancient ionotropic co-receptor IR25a is required for CO(2) attraction, and that the receptors necessary for CO(2) avoidance are not involved. Our study lays the foundation for future research to determine the neural circuits underlying both state- and odorant- dependent decision making in Drosophila. 2018-11-21 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6314688/ /pubmed/30464346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints (http://www.nature.com/reprints) . |
spellingShingle | Article van Breugel, Floris Huda, Ainul Dickinson, Michael H. Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title | Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title_full | Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title_fullStr | Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title_short | Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila |
title_sort | distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to co(2) in drosophila |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbreugelfloris distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila AT hudaainul distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila AT dickinsonmichaelh distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila |