Cargando…

Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila

Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Breugel, Floris, Huda, Ainul, Dickinson, Michael H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8
_version_ 1783384141197213696
author van Breugel, Floris
Huda, Ainul
Dickinson, Michael H.
author_facet van Breugel, Floris
Huda, Ainul
Dickinson, Michael H.
author_sort van Breugel, Floris
collection PubMed
description Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation, laboratory experiments suggest that walking flies avoid CO(2)(7–12). Here, we resolve this paradox by showing that both flying and walking Drosophila find CO(2) attractive, but only when in an active state associated with foraging. Aversion at low activity levels may be an adaptation to avoid CO(2)-seeking-parasites, or succumbing to respiratory acidosis in the presence of high concentrations of CO(2) that exist in nature(13,14). In contrast to CO(2), flies are attracted to ethanol in all behavioral states, and invest twice the time searching near ethanol compared to CO(2). These behavioral differences reflect the fact that whereas CO(2) is generated by many natural processes, ethanol is a unique signature of yeast fermentation. Using genetic tools, we determined that the evolutionarily ancient ionotropic co-receptor IR25a is required for CO(2) attraction, and that the receptors necessary for CO(2) avoidance are not involved. Our study lays the foundation for future research to determine the neural circuits underlying both state- and odorant- dependent decision making in Drosophila.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63146882019-05-21 Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila van Breugel, Floris Huda, Ainul Dickinson, Michael H. Nature Article Carbon dioxide is produced by many organic processes, and is a convenient volatile cue for insects(1) searching for blood hosts(2), flowers(3), communal nests(4), fruit(5), and wildfires(6). Curiously, although Drosophila melanogaster feed on yeast that produce CO(2) and ethanol during fermentation, laboratory experiments suggest that walking flies avoid CO(2)(7–12). Here, we resolve this paradox by showing that both flying and walking Drosophila find CO(2) attractive, but only when in an active state associated with foraging. Aversion at low activity levels may be an adaptation to avoid CO(2)-seeking-parasites, or succumbing to respiratory acidosis in the presence of high concentrations of CO(2) that exist in nature(13,14). In contrast to CO(2), flies are attracted to ethanol in all behavioral states, and invest twice the time searching near ethanol compared to CO(2). These behavioral differences reflect the fact that whereas CO(2) is generated by many natural processes, ethanol is a unique signature of yeast fermentation. Using genetic tools, we determined that the evolutionarily ancient ionotropic co-receptor IR25a is required for CO(2) attraction, and that the receptors necessary for CO(2) avoidance are not involved. Our study lays the foundation for future research to determine the neural circuits underlying both state- and odorant- dependent decision making in Drosophila. 2018-11-21 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6314688/ /pubmed/30464346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints (http://www.nature.com/reprints) .
spellingShingle Article
van Breugel, Floris
Huda, Ainul
Dickinson, Michael H.
Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title_full Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title_fullStr Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title_short Distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to CO(2) in Drosophila
title_sort distinct activity-gated pathways mediate attraction and aversion to co(2) in drosophila
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0732-8
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbreugelfloris distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila
AT hudaainul distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila
AT dickinsonmichaelh distinctactivitygatedpathwaysmediateattractionandaversiontoco2indrosophila