Cargando…

A Novel Donkey Milk–derived Human Milk Fortifier in Feeding Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the use of donkey milk–derived fortifier (DF) with commercial bovine milk–derived fortifier (BF) in very preterm or very-low-birth-weight newborns, in terms of feeding tolerance. METHODS: This trial included 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertino, Enrico, Cavallarin, Laura, Cresi, Francesco, Tonetto, Paola, Peila, Chiara, Ansaldi, Giulia, Raia, Melissa, Varalda, Alessia, Giribaldi, Marzia, Conti, Amedeo, Antoniazzi, Sara, Moro, Guido E., Spada, Elena, Milani, Silvano, Coscia, Alessandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30320665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002168
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the use of donkey milk–derived fortifier (DF) with commercial bovine milk–derived fortifier (BF) in very preterm or very-low-birth-weight newborns, in terms of feeding tolerance. METHODS: This trial included 156 newborns born at <32 weeks of gestational age and/or with a birth weight ≤1500 g. Newborns were randomized 1:1 to receive enteral feeding with either a BF-arm, or a new, DF-arm for 21 days. The fortification protocol was the same for both study arms, and the 2 diets were designed to be isoproteic and isocaloric. Feeding tolerance was assessed by a standardized protocol. RESULTS: The risk of feeding intolerance tended to be lower in DF-arm than in BF-arm, with a relative risk reduction of 0.63 (95% confidence interval: −0.29, +0.90). The mean number of episodes per newborn of feeding intolerance and feeding interruptions (any duration) were consistently lower in the DF-arm than in the BF-arm. Episodes of bilious gastric residuals and vomiting were significantly lower in the DF-arm. Time needed to reach full enteral feeding (150 mL · kg(−1) · day(−1)) and daily weight increase between the first day of exclusive enteral feeding (ie, without administering intravenous fluids) and discharge were similar in the BF- and DF-arms. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that DF improve feeding tolerance when compared with standard bovine-derived fortifiers, with a similar auxological outcome.