Cargando…

Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients

BACKGROUND: Low back and leg pain due to lumbar discal hernia (LDH) is an important health issue. Current evidences support surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed conservative treatment and do not exhibit any psychosocial overlay. However, as known, sometimes it may be still very dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çakir, Tayfun, Çakir, Mürteza, Okay, Hilmi Önder, Yolaş, Coşkun, Tanriverdi, Osman, Ömeroğlu, Muhammed, Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013854
_version_ 1783384152194678784
author Çakir, Tayfun
Çakir, Mürteza
Okay, Hilmi Önder
Yolaş, Coşkun
Tanriverdi, Osman
Ömeroğlu, Muhammed
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
author_facet Çakir, Tayfun
Çakir, Mürteza
Okay, Hilmi Önder
Yolaş, Coşkun
Tanriverdi, Osman
Ömeroğlu, Muhammed
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
author_sort Çakir, Tayfun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back and leg pain due to lumbar discal hernia (LDH) is an important health issue. Current evidences support surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed conservative treatment and do not exhibit any psychosocial overlay. However, as known, sometimes it may be still very difficult to normalize the life qualities of patients for long times. Now different surgical methods for LDH are in use with new technological materials. One of them is lumbar disc prosthesis. In this study, the radiological and clinical effects of using lumbar disc prosthesis were evaluated with comparing patients underwent simple lumbar microdsicectomy. The purpose of this study is to reveal whether inserting the disc prosthesis into the intervertebral distance after lumbar microdiscectomy is beneficial or not both radiologically and clinically. METHODS: A total of 114 patients were analyzed; the first cohort consisted of 57 patients who received a lumbar discectomy at a single level along with the implantation of a disc prosthesis and the second consisted of 57 patients only received a lumbar discectomy at a single level. These 2 groups were studied by comparing the disc space on the level of carried out operations with pain scales, foramen diameters of coming about related roots preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 years. RESULTS: One of the significant results of the implementation of the disc prosthesis is fulfilment of a healthy disc height again after microdiscectomy due to LDH. We concluded that fulfilment of a healthy disc height with lumbar disc prosthesis was clinically beneficial for patients underwent microdiscectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that the implantation of a disc prosthesis in appropriate patients is more favorable regarding pain and spinal physiology when compared to simple microdiscectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63147362019-01-14 Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients Çakir, Tayfun Çakir, Mürteza Okay, Hilmi Önder Yolaş, Coşkun Tanriverdi, Osman Ömeroğlu, Muhammed Arslan, Yusuf Kemal Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Low back and leg pain due to lumbar discal hernia (LDH) is an important health issue. Current evidences support surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed conservative treatment and do not exhibit any psychosocial overlay. However, as known, sometimes it may be still very difficult to normalize the life qualities of patients for long times. Now different surgical methods for LDH are in use with new technological materials. One of them is lumbar disc prosthesis. In this study, the radiological and clinical effects of using lumbar disc prosthesis were evaluated with comparing patients underwent simple lumbar microdsicectomy. The purpose of this study is to reveal whether inserting the disc prosthesis into the intervertebral distance after lumbar microdiscectomy is beneficial or not both radiologically and clinically. METHODS: A total of 114 patients were analyzed; the first cohort consisted of 57 patients who received a lumbar discectomy at a single level along with the implantation of a disc prosthesis and the second consisted of 57 patients only received a lumbar discectomy at a single level. These 2 groups were studied by comparing the disc space on the level of carried out operations with pain scales, foramen diameters of coming about related roots preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 years. RESULTS: One of the significant results of the implementation of the disc prosthesis is fulfilment of a healthy disc height again after microdiscectomy due to LDH. We concluded that fulfilment of a healthy disc height with lumbar disc prosthesis was clinically beneficial for patients underwent microdiscectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that the implantation of a disc prosthesis in appropriate patients is more favorable regarding pain and spinal physiology when compared to simple microdiscectomy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6314736/ /pubmed/30593186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013854 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Çakir, Tayfun
Çakir, Mürteza
Okay, Hilmi Önder
Yolaş, Coşkun
Tanriverdi, Osman
Ömeroğlu, Muhammed
Arslan, Yusuf Kemal
Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title_full Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title_fullStr Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title_full_unstemmed Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title_short Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
title_sort single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: a comparative study of 114 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013854
work_keys_str_mv AT cakirtayfun singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT cakirmurteza singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT okayhilmionder singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT yolascoskun singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT tanriverdiosman singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT omeroglumuhammed singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients
AT arslanyusufkemal singleleveldiscectomywithandwithoutdiscprosthesisacomparativestudyof114patients