Cargando…
Practice styles, knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners and gastroenterology specialists who treat gastroesophageal reflux disease
As little is known on the subject, our aim was to compare practice styles, knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs), and gastroenterology specialists (GIs) regarding the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An internet survey designed by the authors was sent nationwide...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013781 |
Sumario: | As little is known on the subject, our aim was to compare practice styles, knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners (GPs), and gastroenterology specialists (GIs) regarding the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An internet survey designed by the authors was sent nationwide and randomly to 290 GIs and 1312 GPs. We assessed for the burden of GERD, indications for referral for a GI consultation, criteria for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) selection, and main unmet treatment needs. Forty (14%) GIs and 132 (10%) GPs returned the questionnaire. Both groups treat 13 to 14 GERD patients weekly (mean age 41–50 years). The most common first and second line drug of choice in both groups was omeprazole and esomeprazole, respectively. GIs stated that the most important consideration for the selection of treatment was high safety profile, whereas GPs considered it to be a rapid symptomatic relief. In the case of first and second line PPI failures, GIs tended to prescribe a non PPI treatment, whereas GPs restarted esomeprazole. GIs stated that the most prevalent conceived limitations of PPI treatment were nighttime heartburn and undesirable side effects, whereas GPs considered treatment inflexibility and drug interactions. GIs and GPs hold different practice styles, knowledge, and attitudes on the treatment of GERD. Our findings ascertain the need for the development of updated National Clinical Guidelines focusing on GERD. |
---|