Cargando…

Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery

The purpose of our study is to compare the predictive accuracy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the results of conventional cataract surgery. This prospective study included 83 eyes from 83 patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and 83 eyes from 83 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whang, Woong-Joo, Yoo, Young-Sik, Joo, Choun-Ki, Yoon, Geunyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013784
_version_ 1783384156628058112
author Whang, Woong-Joo
Yoo, Young-Sik
Joo, Choun-Ki
Yoon, Geunyoung
author_facet Whang, Woong-Joo
Yoo, Young-Sik
Joo, Choun-Ki
Yoon, Geunyoung
author_sort Whang, Woong-Joo
collection PubMed
description The purpose of our study is to compare the predictive accuracy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the results of conventional cataract surgery. This prospective study included 83 eyes from 83 patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and 83 eyes from 83 patients who underwent conventional cataract surgery. Preoperative IOL power calculations were performed with the partical coherence interferometry. Femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy was based on 5.2 mm scanned capsule center. Following phacoemulsification, 1-piece IOL was inserted into the capsular bag. Refractive outcome was measured 3 months postoperatively with manual refraction. Predicted refraction was assessed by the Barret-Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, and T2 formulas. We applied optimized IOL constants and retrospectively personalized IOL constants. There was no difference in preoperative demographic data. When the optimized IOL constants were used, the femtosecond laser-assisted group produced significantly lower MAEs in the Barret-Universal II, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, and T2 formulas (P < .05). After the personalization of IOL constants, there were statistical differences in the Barret-Universal II, Hoffer Q (P < .05). The standard deviation of ME and MedAE were also relatively lower with femtosecond laser-assisted group. In conclusion, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with Catalys femtosecond laser system produced better refractive outcomes than conventional cataract surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6314757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63147572019-01-14 Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery Whang, Woong-Joo Yoo, Young-Sik Joo, Choun-Ki Yoon, Geunyoung Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The purpose of our study is to compare the predictive accuracy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the results of conventional cataract surgery. This prospective study included 83 eyes from 83 patients who underwent femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and 83 eyes from 83 patients who underwent conventional cataract surgery. Preoperative IOL power calculations were performed with the partical coherence interferometry. Femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy was based on 5.2 mm scanned capsule center. Following phacoemulsification, 1-piece IOL was inserted into the capsular bag. Refractive outcome was measured 3 months postoperatively with manual refraction. Predicted refraction was assessed by the Barret-Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, and T2 formulas. We applied optimized IOL constants and retrospectively personalized IOL constants. There was no difference in preoperative demographic data. When the optimized IOL constants were used, the femtosecond laser-assisted group produced significantly lower MAEs in the Barret-Universal II, Hoffer Q, SRK/T, and T2 formulas (P < .05). After the personalization of IOL constants, there were statistical differences in the Barret-Universal II, Hoffer Q (P < .05). The standard deviation of ME and MedAE were also relatively lower with femtosecond laser-assisted group. In conclusion, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with Catalys femtosecond laser system produced better refractive outcomes than conventional cataract surgery. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6314757/ /pubmed/30593159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013784 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Whang, Woong-Joo
Yoo, Young-Sik
Joo, Choun-Ki
Yoon, Geunyoung
Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title_full Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title_short Comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
title_sort comparison of refractive outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6314757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593159
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013784
work_keys_str_mv AT whangwoongjoo comparisonofrefractiveoutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryandconventionalcataractsurgery
AT yooyoungsik comparisonofrefractiveoutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryandconventionalcataractsurgery
AT joochounki comparisonofrefractiveoutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryandconventionalcataractsurgery
AT yoongeunyoung comparisonofrefractiveoutcomesbetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryandconventionalcataractsurgery