Cargando…
Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results
Back pain and diseases of the spine are today a health disorder of outstanding epidemiological, medical, and health economic importance. The cost of care for patients with lumbosciatic complaints are steadily increasing. Accordingly, the guidelines and treatments are constantly renewed. One concept...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662686 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7791 |
_version_ | 1783384261045256192 |
---|---|
author | Schott, Cordelia Zirke, Sonja Schmelzle, Jillian Marie Kaiser, Christel Fernández, Lluis Aguilar i |
author_facet | Schott, Cordelia Zirke, Sonja Schmelzle, Jillian Marie Kaiser, Christel Fernández, Lluis Aguilar i |
author_sort | Schott, Cordelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Back pain and diseases of the spine are today a health disorder of outstanding epidemiological, medical, and health economic importance. The cost of care for patients with lumbosciatic complaints are steadily increasing. Accordingly, the guidelines and treatments are constantly renewed. One concept is the orthotic care. In the following we want to give an overview of the literature and the effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain supplemented by our own data. A prospective randomized study with 230 patients, divided into three groups, each with two subgroups. Three Orthoses by the TIGGES-Zours GmbH were prescribed; a demountable two-step lumbar orthosis, three-step bridging orthosis and a four-step flexion orthosis modular system. Each were compared to the nonmodular equivalent. All six groups showed improvement in pain intensity and functional capacity at 6 and 12 weeks. The modular groups were found to have improvement in the frequency of use. The subjective effectiveness and sensitivity for the modular and non-modular groups was assessed as being good. In the literature, there are no clear guidelines for an orthotic supply. The studies do not seem to be meaningful and universal due to the difficult ascertainability of pain. There is a need for further research here. Nevertheless, the authors of this review are of the opinion that the implementation of trunk orthoses is void of side effects and beneficial to patients. The modular systems seem to have an advantage as well as higher patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6315306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63153062019-01-18 Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results Schott, Cordelia Zirke, Sonja Schmelzle, Jillian Marie Kaiser, Christel Fernández, Lluis Aguilar i Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review Back pain and diseases of the spine are today a health disorder of outstanding epidemiological, medical, and health economic importance. The cost of care for patients with lumbosciatic complaints are steadily increasing. Accordingly, the guidelines and treatments are constantly renewed. One concept is the orthotic care. In the following we want to give an overview of the literature and the effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain supplemented by our own data. A prospective randomized study with 230 patients, divided into three groups, each with two subgroups. Three Orthoses by the TIGGES-Zours GmbH were prescribed; a demountable two-step lumbar orthosis, three-step bridging orthosis and a four-step flexion orthosis modular system. Each were compared to the nonmodular equivalent. All six groups showed improvement in pain intensity and functional capacity at 6 and 12 weeks. The modular groups were found to have improvement in the frequency of use. The subjective effectiveness and sensitivity for the modular and non-modular groups was assessed as being good. In the literature, there are no clear guidelines for an orthotic supply. The studies do not seem to be meaningful and universal due to the difficult ascertainability of pain. There is a need for further research here. Nevertheless, the authors of this review are of the opinion that the implementation of trunk orthoses is void of side effects and beneficial to patients. The modular systems seem to have an advantage as well as higher patient satisfaction. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6315306/ /pubmed/30662686 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7791 Text en ©Copyright C. Schott et al., 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Schott, Cordelia Zirke, Sonja Schmelzle, Jillian Marie Kaiser, Christel Fernández, Lluis Aguilar i Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title | Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title_full | Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title_short | Effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: Review of the literature and our results |
title_sort | effectiveness of lumbar orthoses in low back pain: review of the literature and our results |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662686 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2018.7791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schottcordelia effectivenessoflumbarorthosesinlowbackpainreviewoftheliteratureandourresults AT zirkesonja effectivenessoflumbarorthosesinlowbackpainreviewoftheliteratureandourresults AT schmelzlejillianmarie effectivenessoflumbarorthosesinlowbackpainreviewoftheliteratureandourresults AT kaiserchristel effectivenessoflumbarorthosesinlowbackpainreviewoftheliteratureandourresults AT fernandezlluisaguilari effectivenessoflumbarorthosesinlowbackpainreviewoftheliteratureandourresults |