Cargando…

Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training

The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comfort, Paul, Thomas, Christopher, Dos’Santos, Thomas, Suchomel, Timothy J., Jones, Paul A., McMahon, John J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176
_version_ 1783384289492074496
author Comfort, Paul
Thomas, Christopher
Dos’Santos, Thomas
Suchomel, Timothy J.
Jones, Paul A.
McMahon, John J.
author_facet Comfort, Paul
Thomas, Christopher
Dos’Santos, Thomas
Suchomel, Timothy J.
Jones, Paul A.
McMahon, John J.
author_sort Comfort, Paul
collection PubMed
description The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; weight 68.1 ± 11.8 kg) performed three isometric mid-thigh pulls and countermovement jumps to permit the calculation of DSI. T-tests and Cohen’s effect sizes revealed a significant but small (p = 0.009, d = 0.50) decrease in DSI post-training (0.71 ± 0.13 N·N(−1)) compared to pre-training (0.65 ± 0.11 N·N(−1)); however, when divided into high and low DSI groups, differential responses were clear. The low DSI group exhibited no significant or meaningful (p = 1.000, d = 0.00) change in DSI pre to post-training (0.56 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.56 ± 0.09 N·N(−1), respectively), whereas the high DSI group demonstrated a significant and large decrease (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in DSI pre to post-training (0.85 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.74 ± 0.11 N·N(−1), respectively), resulting in a significant and moderate difference (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in the change in DSI between groups. These results demonstrate that DSI decreases in response to strength training, as expected, due to an increase in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force, with minimal change in dynamic (countermovement jump) peak force.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6315417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63154172019-01-10 Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training Comfort, Paul Thomas, Christopher Dos’Santos, Thomas Suchomel, Timothy J. Jones, Paul A. McMahon, John J. Sports (Basel) Article The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; weight 68.1 ± 11.8 kg) performed three isometric mid-thigh pulls and countermovement jumps to permit the calculation of DSI. T-tests and Cohen’s effect sizes revealed a significant but small (p = 0.009, d = 0.50) decrease in DSI post-training (0.71 ± 0.13 N·N(−1)) compared to pre-training (0.65 ± 0.11 N·N(−1)); however, when divided into high and low DSI groups, differential responses were clear. The low DSI group exhibited no significant or meaningful (p = 1.000, d = 0.00) change in DSI pre to post-training (0.56 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.56 ± 0.09 N·N(−1), respectively), whereas the high DSI group demonstrated a significant and large decrease (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in DSI pre to post-training (0.85 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.74 ± 0.11 N·N(−1), respectively), resulting in a significant and moderate difference (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in the change in DSI between groups. These results demonstrate that DSI decreases in response to strength training, as expected, due to an increase in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force, with minimal change in dynamic (countermovement jump) peak force. MDPI 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6315417/ /pubmed/30572561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Comfort, Paul
Thomas, Christopher
Dos’Santos, Thomas
Suchomel, Timothy J.
Jones, Paul A.
McMahon, John J.
Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title_full Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title_fullStr Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title_short Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
title_sort changes in dynamic strength index in response to strength training
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572561
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176
work_keys_str_mv AT comfortpaul changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining
AT thomaschristopher changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining
AT dossantosthomas changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining
AT suchomeltimothyj changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining
AT jonespaula changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining
AT mcmahonjohnj changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining