Cargando…
Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training
The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176 |
_version_ | 1783384289492074496 |
---|---|
author | Comfort, Paul Thomas, Christopher Dos’Santos, Thomas Suchomel, Timothy J. Jones, Paul A. McMahon, John J. |
author_facet | Comfort, Paul Thomas, Christopher Dos’Santos, Thomas Suchomel, Timothy J. Jones, Paul A. McMahon, John J. |
author_sort | Comfort, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; weight 68.1 ± 11.8 kg) performed three isometric mid-thigh pulls and countermovement jumps to permit the calculation of DSI. T-tests and Cohen’s effect sizes revealed a significant but small (p = 0.009, d = 0.50) decrease in DSI post-training (0.71 ± 0.13 N·N(−1)) compared to pre-training (0.65 ± 0.11 N·N(−1)); however, when divided into high and low DSI groups, differential responses were clear. The low DSI group exhibited no significant or meaningful (p = 1.000, d = 0.00) change in DSI pre to post-training (0.56 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.56 ± 0.09 N·N(−1), respectively), whereas the high DSI group demonstrated a significant and large decrease (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in DSI pre to post-training (0.85 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.74 ± 0.11 N·N(−1), respectively), resulting in a significant and moderate difference (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in the change in DSI between groups. These results demonstrate that DSI decreases in response to strength training, as expected, due to an increase in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force, with minimal change in dynamic (countermovement jump) peak force. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6315417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63154172019-01-10 Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training Comfort, Paul Thomas, Christopher Dos’Santos, Thomas Suchomel, Timothy J. Jones, Paul A. McMahon, John J. Sports (Basel) Article The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of a four-week period of in-season strength training on the dynamic strength index (DSI). Pre and post a four-week period of strength-based training, twenty-four collegiate athletes (age = 19.9 ± 1.3 years; height = 1.70 ± 0.11 m; weight 68.1 ± 11.8 kg) performed three isometric mid-thigh pulls and countermovement jumps to permit the calculation of DSI. T-tests and Cohen’s effect sizes revealed a significant but small (p = 0.009, d = 0.50) decrease in DSI post-training (0.71 ± 0.13 N·N(−1)) compared to pre-training (0.65 ± 0.11 N·N(−1)); however, when divided into high and low DSI groups, differential responses were clear. The low DSI group exhibited no significant or meaningful (p = 1.000, d = 0.00) change in DSI pre to post-training (0.56 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.56 ± 0.09 N·N(−1), respectively), whereas the high DSI group demonstrated a significant and large decrease (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in DSI pre to post-training (0.85 ± 0.05 N·N(−1), 0.74 ± 0.11 N·N(−1), respectively), resulting in a significant and moderate difference (p = 0.034, d = 1.29) in the change in DSI between groups. These results demonstrate that DSI decreases in response to strength training, as expected, due to an increase in isometric mid-thigh pull peak force, with minimal change in dynamic (countermovement jump) peak force. MDPI 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6315417/ /pubmed/30572561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Comfort, Paul Thomas, Christopher Dos’Santos, Thomas Suchomel, Timothy J. Jones, Paul A. McMahon, John J. Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title | Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title_full | Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title_fullStr | Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title_short | Changes in Dynamic Strength Index in Response to Strength Training |
title_sort | changes in dynamic strength index in response to strength training |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30572561 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT comfortpaul changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining AT thomaschristopher changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining AT dossantosthomas changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining AT suchomeltimothyj changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining AT jonespaula changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining AT mcmahonjohnj changesindynamicstrengthindexinresponsetostrengthtraining |