Cargando…

Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents

The purpose of this study was to compare different methods for assessing plyometric ability during countermovement (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJ) in a group of adults and adolescents. Ten resistance-trained adult men (age: 22.6 ± 1.6 years) and ten adolescent male basketball players (age: 16.5 ± 0.7 year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snyder, Brandon W., Munford, Shawn N., Connaboy, Chris, Lamont, Hugh S., Davis, Shala E., Moir, Gavin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040132
_version_ 1783384308146241536
author Snyder, Brandon W.
Munford, Shawn N.
Connaboy, Chris
Lamont, Hugh S.
Davis, Shala E.
Moir, Gavin L.
author_facet Snyder, Brandon W.
Munford, Shawn N.
Connaboy, Chris
Lamont, Hugh S.
Davis, Shala E.
Moir, Gavin L.
author_sort Snyder, Brandon W.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare different methods for assessing plyometric ability during countermovement (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJ) in a group of adults and adolescents. Ten resistance-trained adult men (age: 22.6 ± 1.6 years) and ten adolescent male basketball players (age: 16.5 ± 0.7 years) performed a CMJ and a DJ from a height of 0.40 m. Jump height (JH), contact time, normalized work (W(NORM)), and power output (PO(NORM)) during the absorption and propulsion phases were calculated from force platforms and 3-D motion analysis data. Plyometric ability was assessed using the modified reactive strength index (RSI(MOD) during CMJ) and the reactive strength index (RSI during DJ) as well as three indices using propulsion time, propulsion work (PWI), and propulsion power. Adults jumped significantly higher than adolescents (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m) while JH (MD: 0.05 m) and ground contact time (MD: 0.29 s) decreased significantly from CMJ to DJ. W(NORM) (MD: 4.2 J/kg) and PO(NORM) (MD: 24.2 W/kg) during the absorption phase of CMJ were significantly less than these variables during the propulsion phases of the jumps. The reactive strength index variants increased significantly from the CMJ to DJ (MD: 0.23) while all other plyometric indices decreased significantly. Neither RSI(MOD) nor RSI contributed significantly to the prediction of JH during CMJ and DJ, respectively, while PWI was able to explain ≥68% of the variance in JH. Variants of the reactive strength index do not reflect the changes in mechanical variables during the ground contact phase of CMJ and DJ and may not provide an accurate assessment of plyometric ability during different vertical jumps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6315494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63154942019-01-10 Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents Snyder, Brandon W. Munford, Shawn N. Connaboy, Chris Lamont, Hugh S. Davis, Shala E. Moir, Gavin L. Sports (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to compare different methods for assessing plyometric ability during countermovement (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJ) in a group of adults and adolescents. Ten resistance-trained adult men (age: 22.6 ± 1.6 years) and ten adolescent male basketball players (age: 16.5 ± 0.7 years) performed a CMJ and a DJ from a height of 0.40 m. Jump height (JH), contact time, normalized work (W(NORM)), and power output (PO(NORM)) during the absorption and propulsion phases were calculated from force platforms and 3-D motion analysis data. Plyometric ability was assessed using the modified reactive strength index (RSI(MOD) during CMJ) and the reactive strength index (RSI during DJ) as well as three indices using propulsion time, propulsion work (PWI), and propulsion power. Adults jumped significantly higher than adolescents (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m) while JH (MD: 0.05 m) and ground contact time (MD: 0.29 s) decreased significantly from CMJ to DJ. W(NORM) (MD: 4.2 J/kg) and PO(NORM) (MD: 24.2 W/kg) during the absorption phase of CMJ were significantly less than these variables during the propulsion phases of the jumps. The reactive strength index variants increased significantly from the CMJ to DJ (MD: 0.23) while all other plyometric indices decreased significantly. Neither RSI(MOD) nor RSI contributed significantly to the prediction of JH during CMJ and DJ, respectively, while PWI was able to explain ≥68% of the variance in JH. Variants of the reactive strength index do not reflect the changes in mechanical variables during the ground contact phase of CMJ and DJ and may not provide an accurate assessment of plyometric ability during different vertical jumps. MDPI 2018-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6315494/ /pubmed/30373241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040132 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Snyder, Brandon W.
Munford, Shawn N.
Connaboy, Chris
Lamont, Hugh S.
Davis, Shala E.
Moir, Gavin L.
Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title_full Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title_fullStr Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title_short Assessing Plyometric Ability during Vertical Jumps Performed by Adults and Adolescents
title_sort assessing plyometric ability during vertical jumps performed by adults and adolescents
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30373241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040132
work_keys_str_mv AT snyderbrandonw assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents
AT munfordshawnn assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents
AT connaboychris assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents
AT lamonthughs assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents
AT davisshalae assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents
AT moirgavinl assessingplyometricabilityduringverticaljumpsperformedbyadultsandadolescents