Cargando…
Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102 |
_version_ | 1783384322162556928 |
---|---|
author | Burckhardt, Irene |
author_facet | Burckhardt, Irene |
author_sort | Burckhardt, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to report. However, the benefits for an individual laboratory can only be estimated after the implementation and depending on the classic workflows currently performed. The two main components of automation are hardware and workflow. This review focusses on the workflow aspects of automation and describes some of the main developments during recent years. Additionally, it tries to define some terms which are related to automation and specifies some developments which would further improve automated systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6315553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63155532019-01-10 Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology Burckhardt, Irene Bioengineering (Basel) Review Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to report. However, the benefits for an individual laboratory can only be estimated after the implementation and depending on the classic workflows currently performed. The two main components of automation are hardware and workflow. This review focusses on the workflow aspects of automation and describes some of the main developments during recent years. Additionally, it tries to define some terms which are related to automation and specifies some developments which would further improve automated systems. MDPI 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6315553/ /pubmed/30467275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Burckhardt, Irene Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title | Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title_full | Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title_short | Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology |
title_sort | laboratory automation in clinical microbiology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burckhardtirene laboratoryautomationinclinicalmicrobiology |