Cargando…

Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology

Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Burckhardt, Irene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102
_version_ 1783384322162556928
author Burckhardt, Irene
author_facet Burckhardt, Irene
author_sort Burckhardt, Irene
collection PubMed
description Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to report. However, the benefits for an individual laboratory can only be estimated after the implementation and depending on the classic workflows currently performed. The two main components of automation are hardware and workflow. This review focusses on the workflow aspects of automation and describes some of the main developments during recent years. Additionally, it tries to define some terms which are related to automation and specifies some developments which would further improve automated systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6315553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63155532019-01-10 Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology Burckhardt, Irene Bioengineering (Basel) Review Laboratory automation is currently the main organizational challenge for microbiologists. Automating classic workflows is a strenuous process for the laboratory personnel and a huge and long-lasting financial investment. The investments are rewarded through increases in quality and shortened time to report. However, the benefits for an individual laboratory can only be estimated after the implementation and depending on the classic workflows currently performed. The two main components of automation are hardware and workflow. This review focusses on the workflow aspects of automation and describes some of the main developments during recent years. Additionally, it tries to define some terms which are related to automation and specifies some developments which would further improve automated systems. MDPI 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6315553/ /pubmed/30467275 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Burckhardt, Irene
Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title_full Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title_fullStr Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title_short Laboratory Automation in Clinical Microbiology
title_sort laboratory automation in clinical microbiology
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6315553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467275
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering5040102
work_keys_str_mv AT burckhardtirene laboratoryautomationinclinicalmicrobiology