Cargando…
Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170 |
_version_ | 1783384430704852992 |
---|---|
author | Askow, Andrew T. Stone, Jason D. Arndts, Daniel J. King, Adam C. Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph P. Garrison, J. Craig Bothwell, James M. Esposito, Phil E. Jagim, Andrew R. Jones, Margaret T. Jennings, Will Oliver, Jonathan M. |
author_facet | Askow, Andrew T. Stone, Jason D. Arndts, Daniel J. King, Adam C. Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph P. Garrison, J. Craig Bothwell, James M. Esposito, Phil E. Jagim, Andrew R. Jones, Margaret T. Jennings, Will Oliver, Jonathan M. |
author_sort | Askow, Andrew T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research was to assess the validity and reliability of a commercially-available linear position transducer (LPT). Nine resistance-trained men completed four sessions consisting of a single set of barbell back squat to volitional failure at 75% or 90% one-repetition maximum. Kinetic and kinematic data were captured for each repetition by the LPT and a 3-dimensional motion capture system and bipedal force platforms. In total, 357 instances of data from both systems were analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC), effect size estimates, and standard error of measurement. Overall, the LPT yielded excellent ICCs (all ≥0.94) and small/trivial differences (d < 0.60). When categorized by median values, ICCs remained high (all ≥0.89) and differences remained small or trivial with the exception of high peak velocities (d = −1.46). Together, these data indicate that the commercially-available LPT is a valid and reliable measure for kinetic and kinematic variables of interest with the exception of high peak velocities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6316018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63160182019-01-10 Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device Askow, Andrew T. Stone, Jason D. Arndts, Daniel J. King, Adam C. Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph P. Garrison, J. Craig Bothwell, James M. Esposito, Phil E. Jagim, Andrew R. Jones, Margaret T. Jennings, Will Oliver, Jonathan M. Sports (Basel) Article Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research was to assess the validity and reliability of a commercially-available linear position transducer (LPT). Nine resistance-trained men completed four sessions consisting of a single set of barbell back squat to volitional failure at 75% or 90% one-repetition maximum. Kinetic and kinematic data were captured for each repetition by the LPT and a 3-dimensional motion capture system and bipedal force platforms. In total, 357 instances of data from both systems were analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC), effect size estimates, and standard error of measurement. Overall, the LPT yielded excellent ICCs (all ≥0.94) and small/trivial differences (d < 0.60). When categorized by median values, ICCs remained high (all ≥0.89) and differences remained small or trivial with the exception of high peak velocities (d = −1.46). Together, these data indicate that the commercially-available LPT is a valid and reliable measure for kinetic and kinematic variables of interest with the exception of high peak velocities. MDPI 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6316018/ /pubmed/30544687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Askow, Andrew T. Stone, Jason D. Arndts, Daniel J. King, Adam C. Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph P. Garrison, J. Craig Bothwell, James M. Esposito, Phil E. Jagim, Andrew R. Jones, Margaret T. Jennings, Will Oliver, Jonathan M. Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title | Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title_full | Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title_fullStr | Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title_short | Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device |
title_sort | validity and reliability of a commercially-available velocity and power testing device |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT askowandrewt validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT stonejasond validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT arndtsdanielj validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT kingadamc validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT gotoshiho validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT hannonjosephp validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT garrisonjcraig validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT bothwelljamesm validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT espositophile validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT jagimandrewr validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT jonesmargarett validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT jenningswill validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice AT oliverjonathanm validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice |