Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device

Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Askow, Andrew T., Stone, Jason D., Arndts, Daniel J., King, Adam C., Goto, Shiho, Hannon, Joseph P., Garrison, J. Craig, Bothwell, James M., Esposito, Phil E., Jagim, Andrew R., Jones, Margaret T., Jennings, Will, Oliver, Jonathan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170
_version_ 1783384430704852992
author Askow, Andrew T.
Stone, Jason D.
Arndts, Daniel J.
King, Adam C.
Goto, Shiho
Hannon, Joseph P.
Garrison, J. Craig
Bothwell, James M.
Esposito, Phil E.
Jagim, Andrew R.
Jones, Margaret T.
Jennings, Will
Oliver, Jonathan M.
author_facet Askow, Andrew T.
Stone, Jason D.
Arndts, Daniel J.
King, Adam C.
Goto, Shiho
Hannon, Joseph P.
Garrison, J. Craig
Bothwell, James M.
Esposito, Phil E.
Jagim, Andrew R.
Jones, Margaret T.
Jennings, Will
Oliver, Jonathan M.
author_sort Askow, Andrew T.
collection PubMed
description Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research was to assess the validity and reliability of a commercially-available linear position transducer (LPT). Nine resistance-trained men completed four sessions consisting of a single set of barbell back squat to volitional failure at 75% or 90% one-repetition maximum. Kinetic and kinematic data were captured for each repetition by the LPT and a 3-dimensional motion capture system and bipedal force platforms. In total, 357 instances of data from both systems were analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC), effect size estimates, and standard error of measurement. Overall, the LPT yielded excellent ICCs (all ≥0.94) and small/trivial differences (d < 0.60). When categorized by median values, ICCs remained high (all ≥0.89) and differences remained small or trivial with the exception of high peak velocities (d = −1.46). Together, these data indicate that the commercially-available LPT is a valid and reliable measure for kinetic and kinematic variables of interest with the exception of high peak velocities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6316018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63160182019-01-10 Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device Askow, Andrew T. Stone, Jason D. Arndts, Daniel J. King, Adam C. Goto, Shiho Hannon, Joseph P. Garrison, J. Craig Bothwell, James M. Esposito, Phil E. Jagim, Andrew R. Jones, Margaret T. Jennings, Will Oliver, Jonathan M. Sports (Basel) Article Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research was to assess the validity and reliability of a commercially-available linear position transducer (LPT). Nine resistance-trained men completed four sessions consisting of a single set of barbell back squat to volitional failure at 75% or 90% one-repetition maximum. Kinetic and kinematic data were captured for each repetition by the LPT and a 3-dimensional motion capture system and bipedal force platforms. In total, 357 instances of data from both systems were analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC), effect size estimates, and standard error of measurement. Overall, the LPT yielded excellent ICCs (all ≥0.94) and small/trivial differences (d < 0.60). When categorized by median values, ICCs remained high (all ≥0.89) and differences remained small or trivial with the exception of high peak velocities (d = −1.46). Together, these data indicate that the commercially-available LPT is a valid and reliable measure for kinetic and kinematic variables of interest with the exception of high peak velocities. MDPI 2018-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6316018/ /pubmed/30544687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Askow, Andrew T.
Stone, Jason D.
Arndts, Daniel J.
King, Adam C.
Goto, Shiho
Hannon, Joseph P.
Garrison, J. Craig
Bothwell, James M.
Esposito, Phil E.
Jagim, Andrew R.
Jones, Margaret T.
Jennings, Will
Oliver, Jonathan M.
Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title_full Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title_short Validity and Reliability of a Commercially-Available Velocity and Power Testing Device
title_sort validity and reliability of a commercially-available velocity and power testing device
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports6040170
work_keys_str_mv AT askowandrewt validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT stonejasond validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT arndtsdanielj validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT kingadamc validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT gotoshiho validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT hannonjosephp validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT garrisonjcraig validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT bothwelljamesm validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT espositophile validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT jagimandrewr validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT jonesmargarett validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT jenningswill validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice
AT oliverjonathanm validityandreliabilityofacommerciallyavailablevelocityandpowertestingdevice