Cargando…
Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A
Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are a food safety concern. Existing methods for biologically active SE detection rely on the emetic response in live kittens or monkeys. This method suffers from low sensitivity, poor reproducibility, and causes ethical concerns regarding the use of experimental ani...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10120540 |
_version_ | 1783384456106606592 |
---|---|
author | Rasooly, Reuven Do, Paula He, Xiaohua Hernlem, Bradley |
author_facet | Rasooly, Reuven Do, Paula He, Xiaohua Hernlem, Bradley |
author_sort | Rasooly, Reuven |
collection | PubMed |
description | Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are a food safety concern. Existing methods for biologically active SE detection rely on the emetic response in live kittens or monkeys. This method suffers from low sensitivity, poor reproducibility, and causes ethical concerns regarding the use of experimental animals. The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act encourages the development and adoption of alternatives to testing on animals for chemical toxicity methodologies. In this study, we utilized the superantigenic effect of SE type A (SEA) and used an ex vivo bioassay as an alternative to live animal testing. We found that interleukin-2 (IL-2) secreted by splenocyte can be utilized for quantifiable detection of SEA in food products. To avoid food matrix interference and attenuation of signal, we separated SEA from spiked food products by employing immunomagnetic beads that were coated with an anti-SEA antibody. This ex vivo method has achieved the detection of 1 ng mL(−1) of SEA, which is 10(7) times more sensitive than the existing live animal testing methods. However, this ex vivo bioassay requires sacrificing of mice. To overcome this limitation, we established a cell based in vitro assay using CCRF-CEM, a human CD4(+) T-cell line, for the quantitative detection of SEA. Incubation of SEA with CCRF-CEM human T-cells and Raji cells led to quantifiable and dose dependent secretion of IL-2. This novel cell-based assay is highly specific to biologically active SEA, compared with the related SE toxin subtypes B, D, and E or heat inactivated SEA, which produce no secretion of IL-2. This is the first demonstration of an alternative assay that completely eliminates the use of animals for quantitative detection of active SEA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6316127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63161272019-01-11 Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A Rasooly, Reuven Do, Paula He, Xiaohua Hernlem, Bradley Toxins (Basel) Article Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) are a food safety concern. Existing methods for biologically active SE detection rely on the emetic response in live kittens or monkeys. This method suffers from low sensitivity, poor reproducibility, and causes ethical concerns regarding the use of experimental animals. The Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act encourages the development and adoption of alternatives to testing on animals for chemical toxicity methodologies. In this study, we utilized the superantigenic effect of SE type A (SEA) and used an ex vivo bioassay as an alternative to live animal testing. We found that interleukin-2 (IL-2) secreted by splenocyte can be utilized for quantifiable detection of SEA in food products. To avoid food matrix interference and attenuation of signal, we separated SEA from spiked food products by employing immunomagnetic beads that were coated with an anti-SEA antibody. This ex vivo method has achieved the detection of 1 ng mL(−1) of SEA, which is 10(7) times more sensitive than the existing live animal testing methods. However, this ex vivo bioassay requires sacrificing of mice. To overcome this limitation, we established a cell based in vitro assay using CCRF-CEM, a human CD4(+) T-cell line, for the quantitative detection of SEA. Incubation of SEA with CCRF-CEM human T-cells and Raji cells led to quantifiable and dose dependent secretion of IL-2. This novel cell-based assay is highly specific to biologically active SEA, compared with the related SE toxin subtypes B, D, and E or heat inactivated SEA, which produce no secretion of IL-2. This is the first demonstration of an alternative assay that completely eliminates the use of animals for quantitative detection of active SEA. MDPI 2018-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6316127/ /pubmed/30558281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10120540 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rasooly, Reuven Do, Paula He, Xiaohua Hernlem, Bradley Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title | Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title_full | Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title_fullStr | Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title_short | Alternative to Animal Use for Detecting Biologically Active Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Type A |
title_sort | alternative to animal use for detecting biologically active staphylococcal enterotoxin type a |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30558281 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10120540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasoolyreuven alternativetoanimalusefordetectingbiologicallyactivestaphylococcalenterotoxintypea AT dopaula alternativetoanimalusefordetectingbiologicallyactivestaphylococcalenterotoxintypea AT hexiaohua alternativetoanimalusefordetectingbiologicallyactivestaphylococcalenterotoxintypea AT hernlembradley alternativetoanimalusefordetectingbiologicallyactivestaphylococcalenterotoxintypea |