Cargando…
Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124 |
_version_ | 1783384486212272128 |
---|---|
author | Salehi, Bahare Martorell, Miquel Arbiser, Jack L. Sureda, Antoni Martins, Natália Maurya, Pawan Kumar Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi Kumar, Pradeep Sharifi-Rad, Javad |
author_facet | Salehi, Bahare Martorell, Miquel Arbiser, Jack L. Sureda, Antoni Martins, Natália Maurya, Pawan Kumar Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi Kumar, Pradeep Sharifi-Rad, Javad |
author_sort | Salehi, Bahare |
collection | PubMed |
description | The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly understood. Indeed, non-clinically recommended antioxidants are often consumed in large amounts by the global population, based on the belief that cancer, inflammation and degenerative diseases are triggered by high oxygen levels (or reactive oxygen species) and that through blocking reactive species production, organic unbalances/disorders can be prevented and/or even treated. The popularity of these chemicals arises in part from the widespread public mistrust of allopathic medicine. In fact, reactive oxygen species play a dual role in dealing with different disorders, since they may contribute to disease onset and/or progression but may also play a key role in disease prevention. Further, the ability of the most commonly used supplements, such as vitamins C, E, selenium, and herbal supplements to decrease pathologic reactive oxygen species is not clearly established. Hence, the present review aims to provide a nuanced understanding of where current knowledge is and where it should go. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6316255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63162552019-01-10 Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? Salehi, Bahare Martorell, Miquel Arbiser, Jack L. Sureda, Antoni Martins, Natália Maurya, Pawan Kumar Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi Kumar, Pradeep Sharifi-Rad, Javad Biomolecules Review The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly understood. Indeed, non-clinically recommended antioxidants are often consumed in large amounts by the global population, based on the belief that cancer, inflammation and degenerative diseases are triggered by high oxygen levels (or reactive oxygen species) and that through blocking reactive species production, organic unbalances/disorders can be prevented and/or even treated. The popularity of these chemicals arises in part from the widespread public mistrust of allopathic medicine. In fact, reactive oxygen species play a dual role in dealing with different disorders, since they may contribute to disease onset and/or progression but may also play a key role in disease prevention. Further, the ability of the most commonly used supplements, such as vitamins C, E, selenium, and herbal supplements to decrease pathologic reactive oxygen species is not clearly established. Hence, the present review aims to provide a nuanced understanding of where current knowledge is and where it should go. MDPI 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6316255/ /pubmed/30366441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Salehi, Bahare Martorell, Miquel Arbiser, Jack L. Sureda, Antoni Martins, Natália Maurya, Pawan Kumar Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi Kumar, Pradeep Sharifi-Rad, Javad Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title | Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title_full | Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title_fullStr | Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title_full_unstemmed | Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title_short | Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? |
title_sort | antioxidants: positive or negative actors? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salehibahare antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT martorellmiquel antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT arbiserjackl antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT suredaantoni antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT martinsnatalia antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT mauryapawankumar antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT sharifiradmehdi antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT kumarpradeep antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors AT sharifiradjavad antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors |