Cargando…

Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?

The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly unde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salehi, Bahare, Martorell, Miquel, Arbiser, Jack L., Sureda, Antoni, Martins, Natália, Maurya, Pawan Kumar, Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi, Kumar, Pradeep, Sharifi-Rad, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124
_version_ 1783384486212272128
author Salehi, Bahare
Martorell, Miquel
Arbiser, Jack L.
Sureda, Antoni
Martins, Natália
Maurya, Pawan Kumar
Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi
Kumar, Pradeep
Sharifi-Rad, Javad
author_facet Salehi, Bahare
Martorell, Miquel
Arbiser, Jack L.
Sureda, Antoni
Martins, Natália
Maurya, Pawan Kumar
Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi
Kumar, Pradeep
Sharifi-Rad, Javad
author_sort Salehi, Bahare
collection PubMed
description The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly understood. Indeed, non-clinically recommended antioxidants are often consumed in large amounts by the global population, based on the belief that cancer, inflammation and degenerative diseases are triggered by high oxygen levels (or reactive oxygen species) and that through blocking reactive species production, organic unbalances/disorders can be prevented and/or even treated. The popularity of these chemicals arises in part from the widespread public mistrust of allopathic medicine. In fact, reactive oxygen species play a dual role in dealing with different disorders, since they may contribute to disease onset and/or progression but may also play a key role in disease prevention. Further, the ability of the most commonly used supplements, such as vitamins C, E, selenium, and herbal supplements to decrease pathologic reactive oxygen species is not clearly established. Hence, the present review aims to provide a nuanced understanding of where current knowledge is and where it should go.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6316255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63162552019-01-10 Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors? Salehi, Bahare Martorell, Miquel Arbiser, Jack L. Sureda, Antoni Martins, Natália Maurya, Pawan Kumar Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi Kumar, Pradeep Sharifi-Rad, Javad Biomolecules Review The term “antioxidant” is one of the most confusing definitions in biological/medical sciences. In chemistry, “antioxidant” is simply conceived “a compound that removes reactive species, mainly those oxygen-derived”, while in a cell context, the conceptual definition of an antioxidant is poorly understood. Indeed, non-clinically recommended antioxidants are often consumed in large amounts by the global population, based on the belief that cancer, inflammation and degenerative diseases are triggered by high oxygen levels (or reactive oxygen species) and that through blocking reactive species production, organic unbalances/disorders can be prevented and/or even treated. The popularity of these chemicals arises in part from the widespread public mistrust of allopathic medicine. In fact, reactive oxygen species play a dual role in dealing with different disorders, since they may contribute to disease onset and/or progression but may also play a key role in disease prevention. Further, the ability of the most commonly used supplements, such as vitamins C, E, selenium, and herbal supplements to decrease pathologic reactive oxygen species is not clearly established. Hence, the present review aims to provide a nuanced understanding of where current knowledge is and where it should go. MDPI 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6316255/ /pubmed/30366441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Salehi, Bahare
Martorell, Miquel
Arbiser, Jack L.
Sureda, Antoni
Martins, Natália
Maurya, Pawan Kumar
Sharifi-Rad, Mehdi
Kumar, Pradeep
Sharifi-Rad, Javad
Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title_full Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title_fullStr Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title_full_unstemmed Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title_short Antioxidants: Positive or Negative Actors?
title_sort antioxidants: positive or negative actors?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30366441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom8040124
work_keys_str_mv AT salehibahare antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT martorellmiquel antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT arbiserjackl antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT suredaantoni antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT martinsnatalia antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT mauryapawankumar antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT sharifiradmehdi antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT kumarpradeep antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors
AT sharifiradjavad antioxidantspositiveornegativeactors