Cargando…

Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?

The issue of typological versus population thinking in biology is briefly introduced and defined. It is then emphasized how population thinking is most relevant and useful in vector biology. Three points are made: (1) Vectors, as they exist in nature, are genetically very heterogeneous. (2) Four exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Powell, Jeffrey R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040139
_version_ 1783384550244614144
author Powell, Jeffrey R.
author_facet Powell, Jeffrey R.
author_sort Powell, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description The issue of typological versus population thinking in biology is briefly introduced and defined. It is then emphasized how population thinking is most relevant and useful in vector biology. Three points are made: (1) Vectors, as they exist in nature, are genetically very heterogeneous. (2) Four examples of how this is relevant in vector biology research are presented: Understanding variation in vector competence, GWAS, identifying the origin of new introductions of invasive species, and resistance to inbreeding. (3) The existence of high levels of vector genetic heterogeneity can lead to failure of some approaches to vector control, e.g., use of insecticides and release of sterile males (SIT). On the other hand, vector genetic heterogeneity can be harnessed in a vector control program based on selection for refractoriness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6316525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63165252019-05-05 Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology? Powell, Jeffrey R. Insects Concept Paper The issue of typological versus population thinking in biology is briefly introduced and defined. It is then emphasized how population thinking is most relevant and useful in vector biology. Three points are made: (1) Vectors, as they exist in nature, are genetically very heterogeneous. (2) Four examples of how this is relevant in vector biology research are presented: Understanding variation in vector competence, GWAS, identifying the origin of new introductions of invasive species, and resistance to inbreeding. (3) The existence of high levels of vector genetic heterogeneity can lead to failure of some approaches to vector control, e.g., use of insecticides and release of sterile males (SIT). On the other hand, vector genetic heterogeneity can be harnessed in a vector control program based on selection for refractoriness. MDPI 2018-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6316525/ /pubmed/30314367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040139 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Concept Paper
Powell, Jeffrey R.
Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title_full Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title_fullStr Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title_short Genetic Variation in Insect Vectors: Death of Typology?
title_sort genetic variation in insect vectors: death of typology?
topic Concept Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040139
work_keys_str_mv AT powelljeffreyr geneticvariationininsectvectorsdeathoftypology