Cargando…

Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use

Over-the-counter analgesic use is common and is typically assessed through self-report; therefore, it is subject to misclassification. Detection of drug metabolites in biofluids offers a viable tool for validating self-reported analgesic use. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennis, Kristine K., Carter, Brian D., Gapstur, Susan M., Stevens, Victoria L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo8040055
_version_ 1783384565165850624
author Dennis, Kristine K.
Carter, Brian D.
Gapstur, Susan M.
Stevens, Victoria L.
author_facet Dennis, Kristine K.
Carter, Brian D.
Gapstur, Susan M.
Stevens, Victoria L.
author_sort Dennis, Kristine K.
collection PubMed
description Over-the-counter analgesic use is common and is typically assessed through self-report; therefore, it is subject to misclassification. Detection of drug metabolites in biofluids offers a viable tool for validating self-reported analgesic use. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the utility of a metabolomics approach for the validation of acetaminophen and ibuprofen use in blood samples. Untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics analysis was conducted in serum samples from 1547 women and plasma samples from 556 men. The presence of two metabolites each for acetaminophen and ibuprofen at levels at or above a defined cutoff value was used to determine concordance with self-reported use. For acetaminophen use based on the presence of both acetaminophen and acetamidophenylglucuronide, concordance was 98.5–100% among individuals reporting use today, and 79.8–91.4% for those reporting never or rare use. Ibuprofen use based on the presence of both carboxyibuprofen and hydroxyibuprofen resulted in concordance of 51.3–52.5% for individuals reporting use today and 99.4–100% for those reporting never or rare use. Our findings suggest that an untargeted metabolomics approach in blood samples may be useful for validating self-reported acetaminophen use. However, this approach appears unlikely to be suitable for validating ibuprofen use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6316588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63165882019-01-10 Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use Dennis, Kristine K. Carter, Brian D. Gapstur, Susan M. Stevens, Victoria L. Metabolites Article Over-the-counter analgesic use is common and is typically assessed through self-report; therefore, it is subject to misclassification. Detection of drug metabolites in biofluids offers a viable tool for validating self-reported analgesic use. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the utility of a metabolomics approach for the validation of acetaminophen and ibuprofen use in blood samples. Untargeted mass spectrometry-based metabolomics analysis was conducted in serum samples from 1547 women and plasma samples from 556 men. The presence of two metabolites each for acetaminophen and ibuprofen at levels at or above a defined cutoff value was used to determine concordance with self-reported use. For acetaminophen use based on the presence of both acetaminophen and acetamidophenylglucuronide, concordance was 98.5–100% among individuals reporting use today, and 79.8–91.4% for those reporting never or rare use. Ibuprofen use based on the presence of both carboxyibuprofen and hydroxyibuprofen resulted in concordance of 51.3–52.5% for individuals reporting use today and 99.4–100% for those reporting never or rare use. Our findings suggest that an untargeted metabolomics approach in blood samples may be useful for validating self-reported acetaminophen use. However, this approach appears unlikely to be suitable for validating ibuprofen use. MDPI 2018-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6316588/ /pubmed/30248901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo8040055 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dennis, Kristine K.
Carter, Brian D.
Gapstur, Susan M.
Stevens, Victoria L.
Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title_full Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title_fullStr Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title_full_unstemmed Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title_short Metabolomics Approach for Validation of Self-Reported Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen Use
title_sort metabolomics approach for validation of self-reported ibuprofen and acetaminophen use
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30248901
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo8040055
work_keys_str_mv AT denniskristinek metabolomicsapproachforvalidationofselfreportedibuprofenandacetaminophenuse
AT carterbriand metabolomicsapproachforvalidationofselfreportedibuprofenandacetaminophenuse
AT gapstursusanm metabolomicsapproachforvalidationofselfreportedibuprofenandacetaminophenuse
AT stevensvictorial metabolomicsapproachforvalidationofselfreportedibuprofenandacetaminophenuse