Cargando…
Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum
Lygodium microphyllum (Lygodiaceae) is an invasive climbing fern in peninsular Florida. Two classical biological control agents are currently being released against L. microphyllum: a leaf galling mite, Floracarus perrepae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), and a moth, Neomusotima conspurcatalis (Lepidopte...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040180 |
_version_ | 1783384567772610560 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Ian Lake, Ellen C. |
author_facet | Jones, Ian Lake, Ellen C. |
author_sort | Jones, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lygodium microphyllum (Lygodiaceae) is an invasive climbing fern in peninsular Florida. Two classical biological control agents are currently being released against L. microphyllum: a leaf galling mite, Floracarus perrepae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), and a moth, Neomusotima conspurcatalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Little is known about how the two species interact in the field; thus we conducted oviposition choice tests to determine the effects of F. perrepae presence on oviposition behavior in N. conspurcatalis. Further, we conducted feeding trials with N. conspurcatalis larvae to establish the effects of gall presence on larval survival and rate of development, and determine whether N. conspurcatalis larvae would directly consume F. perrepae galls. Neomusotima conspurcatalis laid significantly more eggs on mite galled (52.66 ± 6.211) versus ungalled (34.40 ± 5.587) L. microphyllum foliage. Feeding trials revealed higher mortality in N. conspurcatalis larvae raised on galled (60%) versus ungalled (36%) L. microphyllum material. In gall feeding trials, N. conspurcatalis larvae consumed or damaged 13.52% of galls, and the rate of direct gall feeding increased over time as leaf resources were depleted. Our results suggest that, where N. conspurcatalis and F. perrepae co-occur, competitive interactions could be more frequent than previously anticipated; however, we do not expect these antagonistic interactions to affect the establishment of either agent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6316599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63165992019-05-05 Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum Jones, Ian Lake, Ellen C. Insects Article Lygodium microphyllum (Lygodiaceae) is an invasive climbing fern in peninsular Florida. Two classical biological control agents are currently being released against L. microphyllum: a leaf galling mite, Floracarus perrepae (Acariformes: Eriophyidae), and a moth, Neomusotima conspurcatalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Little is known about how the two species interact in the field; thus we conducted oviposition choice tests to determine the effects of F. perrepae presence on oviposition behavior in N. conspurcatalis. Further, we conducted feeding trials with N. conspurcatalis larvae to establish the effects of gall presence on larval survival and rate of development, and determine whether N. conspurcatalis larvae would directly consume F. perrepae galls. Neomusotima conspurcatalis laid significantly more eggs on mite galled (52.66 ± 6.211) versus ungalled (34.40 ± 5.587) L. microphyllum foliage. Feeding trials revealed higher mortality in N. conspurcatalis larvae raised on galled (60%) versus ungalled (36%) L. microphyllum material. In gall feeding trials, N. conspurcatalis larvae consumed or damaged 13.52% of galls, and the rate of direct gall feeding increased over time as leaf resources were depleted. Our results suggest that, where N. conspurcatalis and F. perrepae co-occur, competitive interactions could be more frequent than previously anticipated; however, we do not expect these antagonistic interactions to affect the establishment of either agent. MDPI 2018-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6316599/ /pubmed/30513830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040180 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Ian Lake, Ellen C. Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title | Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title_full | Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title_fullStr | Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title_full_unstemmed | Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title_short | Interactions between Two Biological Control Agents on Lygodium microphyllum |
title_sort | interactions between two biological control agents on lygodium microphyllum |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9040180 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesian interactionsbetweentwobiologicalcontrolagentsonlygodiummicrophyllum AT lakeellenc interactionsbetweentwobiologicalcontrolagentsonlygodiummicrophyllum |