Cargando…

Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?

All of the cells in our body share largely identical DNA, yet functionally distinct cells are generated to give rise to different tissues and organs. A fundamental question in biology is how different cell fates are specified and maintained. Epigenetic mechanisms hold a key answer to the question. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Dongmei, Yi, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.322651.118
_version_ 1783384731259240448
author Wang, Dongmei
Yi, Rui
author_facet Wang, Dongmei
Yi, Rui
author_sort Wang, Dongmei
collection PubMed
description All of the cells in our body share largely identical DNA, yet functionally distinct cells are generated to give rise to different tissues and organs. A fundamental question in biology is how different cell fates are specified and maintained. Epigenetic mechanisms hold a key answer to the question. Without changing the sequence of DNA but through modifying DNA, histones, or RNA, epigenetic mechanisms can decide which genes to express and which to suppress. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are a group of evolutionarily conserved proteins that can regulate gene expression through histone modification. Although PcG proteins have been traditionally described as epigenetic repressors, emerging evidence suggests a more complex scenario in which PcG proteins can have a dynamic effect on gene expression. In this issue of Genes & Development, Cohen and colleagues (pp. 55–60) studied the function of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) in mouse skin development and identified PRC1's unique function independent of PRC2. Notably, the total loss of PRC1 but not canonical PRC1 in the skin leads to widespread down-regulation of genes involved in cell adhesion and cytoskeleton organization, resulting in skin fragility. This new study lays a foundation to examine the role of PRC1 in activating gene expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6317317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63173172019-07-01 Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1? Wang, Dongmei Yi, Rui Genes Dev Outlook All of the cells in our body share largely identical DNA, yet functionally distinct cells are generated to give rise to different tissues and organs. A fundamental question in biology is how different cell fates are specified and maintained. Epigenetic mechanisms hold a key answer to the question. Without changing the sequence of DNA but through modifying DNA, histones, or RNA, epigenetic mechanisms can decide which genes to express and which to suppress. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are a group of evolutionarily conserved proteins that can regulate gene expression through histone modification. Although PcG proteins have been traditionally described as epigenetic repressors, emerging evidence suggests a more complex scenario in which PcG proteins can have a dynamic effect on gene expression. In this issue of Genes & Development, Cohen and colleagues (pp. 55–60) studied the function of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) in mouse skin development and identified PRC1's unique function independent of PRC2. Notably, the total loss of PRC1 but not canonical PRC1 in the skin leads to widespread down-regulation of genes involved in cell adhesion and cytoskeleton organization, resulting in skin fragility. This new study lays a foundation to examine the role of PRC1 in activating gene expression. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2019-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6317317/ /pubmed/30602437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.322651.118 Text en © 2019 Wang and Yi; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genesdev.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Outlook
Wang, Dongmei
Yi, Rui
Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title_full Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title_fullStr Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title_full_unstemmed Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title_short Is it time to take R(epressive) out of PRC1?
title_sort is it time to take r(epressive) out of prc1?
topic Outlook
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.322651.118
work_keys_str_mv AT wangdongmei isittimetotakerepressiveoutofprc1
AT yirui isittimetotakerepressiveoutofprc1