Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies
BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the treatment effect of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) versus vehicle on signs/symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in various subgroups (moderate-to-severe DED/severe DED/Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)/SS with severe DED). METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from two s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29545413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311801 |
_version_ | 1783384746309451776 |
---|---|
author | Leonardi, Andrea Messmer, Elisabeth M Labetoulle, Marc Amrane, Mourad Garrigue, Jean-Sébastien Ismail, Dahlia Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Figueiredo, Francisco C Baudouin, Christophe |
author_facet | Leonardi, Andrea Messmer, Elisabeth M Labetoulle, Marc Amrane, Mourad Garrigue, Jean-Sébastien Ismail, Dahlia Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Figueiredo, Francisco C Baudouin, Christophe |
author_sort | Leonardi, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the treatment effect of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) versus vehicle on signs/symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in various subgroups (moderate-to-severe DED/severe DED/Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)/SS with severe DED). METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from two similar phase III studies: SICCANOVE (moderate-to-severe DED) and SANSIKA (severe DED with severe keratitis). In both studies, patients aged ≥18 years received CsA CE 0.1% (n=395) or vehicle (n=339) once daily for 6 months. A composite responder efficacy endpoint (corneal fluorescein staining–Ocular Surface Disease Index (CFS–OSDI) at month 6) was used to evaluate the efficacy of CsA CE in alleviating signs/symptoms of DED (response defined as improvement of ≥2 grades in CFS and ≥30% in OSDI (baseline to month 6)). Human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) conjunctival expression was used as a biomarker of ocular surface inflammation. RESULTS: CsA CE–treated patients were significantly more likely to be CFS–OSDI responders than vehicle-treated patients in the overall (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.50; P=0.015), severe DED (1.80, 1.04 to 3.19; P=0.038) and SS with severe DED (3.37, 1.20 to 11.19; P=0.030) populations. The difference was not significant for CsA CE versus vehicle for the overall Sjögren’s population (OR 1.77, CI 0.89 to 3.66; P=0.109). CsA CE also significantly reduced median HLA-DR expression versus vehicle at 6 months (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Pooled phase III data indicate CsA CE produced significant improvement in signs/symptoms versus vehicle in patients with moderate-to-severe DED (especially in those with severe keratitis), including patients with SS with severe DED. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6317444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63174442019-01-14 Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies Leonardi, Andrea Messmer, Elisabeth M Labetoulle, Marc Amrane, Mourad Garrigue, Jean-Sébastien Ismail, Dahlia Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Figueiredo, Francisco C Baudouin, Christophe Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the treatment effect of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) versus vehicle on signs/symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) in various subgroups (moderate-to-severe DED/severe DED/Sjögren’s syndrome (SS)/SS with severe DED). METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from two similar phase III studies: SICCANOVE (moderate-to-severe DED) and SANSIKA (severe DED with severe keratitis). In both studies, patients aged ≥18 years received CsA CE 0.1% (n=395) or vehicle (n=339) once daily for 6 months. A composite responder efficacy endpoint (corneal fluorescein staining–Ocular Surface Disease Index (CFS–OSDI) at month 6) was used to evaluate the efficacy of CsA CE in alleviating signs/symptoms of DED (response defined as improvement of ≥2 grades in CFS and ≥30% in OSDI (baseline to month 6)). Human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) conjunctival expression was used as a biomarker of ocular surface inflammation. RESULTS: CsA CE–treated patients were significantly more likely to be CFS–OSDI responders than vehicle-treated patients in the overall (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.50; P=0.015), severe DED (1.80, 1.04 to 3.19; P=0.038) and SS with severe DED (3.37, 1.20 to 11.19; P=0.030) populations. The difference was not significant for CsA CE versus vehicle for the overall Sjögren’s population (OR 1.77, CI 0.89 to 3.66; P=0.109). CsA CE also significantly reduced median HLA-DR expression versus vehicle at 6 months (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Pooled phase III data indicate CsA CE produced significant improvement in signs/symptoms versus vehicle in patients with moderate-to-severe DED (especially in those with severe keratitis), including patients with SS with severe DED. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6317444/ /pubmed/29545413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311801 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Leonardi, Andrea Messmer, Elisabeth M Labetoulle, Marc Amrane, Mourad Garrigue, Jean-Sébastien Ismail, Dahlia Sainz-de-la-Maza, Maite Figueiredo, Francisco C Baudouin, Christophe Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title | Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin A cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase III clinical studies |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of 0.1% ciclosporin a cationic emulsion in dry eye disease: a pooled analysis of two double-masked, randomised, vehicle-controlled phase iii clinical studies |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29545413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonardiandrea efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT messmerelisabethm efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT labetoullemarc efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT amranemourad efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT garriguejeansebastien efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT ismaildahlia efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT sainzdelamazamaite efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT figueiredofranciscoc efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies AT baudouinchristophe efficacyandsafetyof01ciclosporinacationicemulsionindryeyediseaseapooledanalysisoftwodoublemaskedrandomisedvehiclecontrolledphaseiiiclinicalstudies |