Cargando…
Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959 |
_version_ | 1783384890787495936 |
---|---|
author | Rufus-Membere, Pamela Holloway-Kew, Kara L Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A Pasco, Julie A |
author_facet | Rufus-Membere, Pamela Holloway-Kew, Kara L Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A Pasco, Julie A |
author_sort | Rufus-Membere, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and tolerability of using the OsteoProbe in men enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in a population-based study. SETTING: Barwon Statistical Division, southeastern Australia, 2016–2018. METHODS: For 252 of 345 consecutive participants (ages 33–96 years), BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe at the mid-tibia. Immediately following measurement, each participant used a Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) to rate the level of discomfort that was anticipated and experienced, their initial reluctance towards the measurement and their willingness to repeat measurement. RESULTS: Reasons for non-measurement in 92 men were needle phobia (n=8), discomfort after first indentation (n=5), skin infections (n=21), excessive soft tissues around the mid-tibia region (n=56), inability to provide informed consent (n=2). Among 252 men who had IMI measures, the expectation for pain during measurement was low (1.54±1.56), as was actual pain experienced (0.38±0.71). Reluctance to undergo measurement was low (0.34±0.93). All participants indicated a willingness to have the measurement performed again. Mean (±SD) BMSi was 83.0±6.4 (range 62.3–93.0). CONCLUSION: In this study, the procedure was well accepted by participants suggesting that IMI testing with the OsteoProbe is feasible in a research setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6318509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63185092019-01-14 Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia Rufus-Membere, Pamela Holloway-Kew, Kara L Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A Pasco, Julie A BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and tolerability of using the OsteoProbe in men enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in a population-based study. SETTING: Barwon Statistical Division, southeastern Australia, 2016–2018. METHODS: For 252 of 345 consecutive participants (ages 33–96 years), BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe at the mid-tibia. Immediately following measurement, each participant used a Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) to rate the level of discomfort that was anticipated and experienced, their initial reluctance towards the measurement and their willingness to repeat measurement. RESULTS: Reasons for non-measurement in 92 men were needle phobia (n=8), discomfort after first indentation (n=5), skin infections (n=21), excessive soft tissues around the mid-tibia region (n=56), inability to provide informed consent (n=2). Among 252 men who had IMI measures, the expectation for pain during measurement was low (1.54±1.56), as was actual pain experienced (0.38±0.71). Reluctance to undergo measurement was low (0.34±0.93). All participants indicated a willingness to have the measurement performed again. Mean (±SD) BMSi was 83.0±6.4 (range 62.3–93.0). CONCLUSION: In this study, the procedure was well accepted by participants suggesting that IMI testing with the OsteoProbe is feasible in a research setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6318509/ /pubmed/30580271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Rufus-Membere, Pamela Holloway-Kew, Kara L Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A Pasco, Julie A Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title | Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title_full | Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title_short | Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia |
title_sort | feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in australia |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rufusmemberepamela feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia AT hollowaykewkaral feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia AT diezperezadolfo feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia AT kotowiczmarka feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia AT pascojuliea feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia |