Cargando…

Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia

OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rufus-Membere, Pamela, Holloway-Kew, Kara L, Diez-Perez, Adolfo, Kotowicz, Mark A, Pasco, Julie A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959
_version_ 1783384890787495936
author Rufus-Membere, Pamela
Holloway-Kew, Kara L
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A
Pasco, Julie A
author_facet Rufus-Membere, Pamela
Holloway-Kew, Kara L
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A
Pasco, Julie A
author_sort Rufus-Membere, Pamela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and tolerability of using the OsteoProbe in men enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in a population-based study. SETTING: Barwon Statistical Division, southeastern Australia, 2016–2018. METHODS: For 252 of 345 consecutive participants (ages 33–96 years), BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe at the mid-tibia. Immediately following measurement, each participant used a Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) to rate the level of discomfort that was anticipated and experienced, their initial reluctance towards the measurement and their willingness to repeat measurement. RESULTS: Reasons for non-measurement in 92 men were needle phobia (n=8), discomfort after first indentation (n=5), skin infections (n=21), excessive soft tissues around the mid-tibia region (n=56), inability to provide informed consent (n=2). Among 252 men who had IMI measures, the expectation for pain during measurement was low (1.54±1.56), as was actual pain experienced (0.38±0.71). Reluctance to undergo measurement was low (0.34±0.93). All participants indicated a willingness to have the measurement performed again. Mean (±SD) BMSi was 83.0±6.4 (range 62.3–93.0). CONCLUSION: In this study, the procedure was well accepted by participants suggesting that IMI testing with the OsteoProbe is feasible in a research setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185092019-01-14 Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia Rufus-Membere, Pamela Holloway-Kew, Kara L Diez-Perez, Adolfo Kotowicz, Mark A Pasco, Julie A BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: The OsteoProbe measures Bone Material Strength Index (BMSi) of cortical bone in living humans using impact microindentation (IMI). Research using this minimally invasive technique is expanding yet, to-date, there have been no reports about its feasibility in the research setting. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and tolerability of using the OsteoProbe in men enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of data collected in a population-based study. SETTING: Barwon Statistical Division, southeastern Australia, 2016–2018. METHODS: For 252 of 345 consecutive participants (ages 33–96 years), BMSi was measured using the OsteoProbe at the mid-tibia. Immediately following measurement, each participant used a Visual Analogue Scale (0–10) to rate the level of discomfort that was anticipated and experienced, their initial reluctance towards the measurement and their willingness to repeat measurement. RESULTS: Reasons for non-measurement in 92 men were needle phobia (n=8), discomfort after first indentation (n=5), skin infections (n=21), excessive soft tissues around the mid-tibia region (n=56), inability to provide informed consent (n=2). Among 252 men who had IMI measures, the expectation for pain during measurement was low (1.54±1.56), as was actual pain experienced (0.38±0.71). Reluctance to undergo measurement was low (0.34±0.93). All participants indicated a willingness to have the measurement performed again. Mean (±SD) BMSi was 83.0±6.4 (range 62.3–93.0). CONCLUSION: In this study, the procedure was well accepted by participants suggesting that IMI testing with the OsteoProbe is feasible in a research setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6318509/ /pubmed/30580271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Rufus-Membere, Pamela
Holloway-Kew, Kara L
Diez-Perez, Adolfo
Kotowicz, Mark A
Pasco, Julie A
Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title_full Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title_fullStr Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title_short Feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in Australia
title_sort feasibility and tolerability of bone impact microindentation testing: a cross-sectional, population-based study in australia
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023959
work_keys_str_mv AT rufusmemberepamela feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia
AT hollowaykewkaral feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia
AT diezperezadolfo feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia
AT kotowiczmarka feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia
AT pascojuliea feasibilityandtolerabilityofboneimpactmicroindentationtestingacrosssectionalpopulationbasedstudyinaustralia