Cargando…

Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care

OBJECTIVES: The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) has not yet been examined among acute/subacute back and/or neck pain in a primary care setting in respect to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work ability outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SBT’s predictive va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forsbrand, Malin H, Grahn, Birgitta, Hill, Jonathan C, Petersson, Ingemar F, Post Sennehed, Charlotte, Stigmar, Kjerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021748
_version_ 1783384894060101632
author Forsbrand, Malin H
Grahn, Birgitta
Hill, Jonathan C
Petersson, Ingemar F
Post Sennehed, Charlotte
Stigmar, Kjerstin
author_facet Forsbrand, Malin H
Grahn, Birgitta
Hill, Jonathan C
Petersson, Ingemar F
Post Sennehed, Charlotte
Stigmar, Kjerstin
author_sort Forsbrand, Malin H
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) has not yet been examined among acute/subacute back and/or neck pain in a primary care setting in respect to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work ability outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SBT’s predictive validity for HRQoL and work ability outcomes at long-term follow-up in a population with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain. SETTING: Prospective data from 35 primary care centres in south Sweden during 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=329) with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain, aged 18–67 years, not on sick leave or <60 days of sick leave completed the SBT when applying for physiotherapy treatment. Long-term follow-up measures (median 13 months, range 11–27 months) of HRQoL (EQ-5D) and work ability (Work Ability Score) was completed by 238 patients (72%). OUTCOMES: The predictive ability of the SBT for HRQoL and work ability outcomes was examined using Kruskal-Wallis test, logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Based on SBT risk group stratification, 103 (43%), 107 (45%) and 28 (12%) patients were considered as low, medium and at high risk, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in HRQoL (p<0.001) and work ability (p<0.001) at follow-up between all three SBT risk groups. Patients in the high risk group had a significantly increased risk of having poor HRQoL (OR 6.16, 95% CI 1.50 to 25.26) and poor work ability (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.75 to 14.71) vs the low risk group at follow-up. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.84) for HRQoL and 0.68 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.76) for work ability. CONCLUSIONS: The SBT is an appropriate tool for identifying patients with a poor long-term HRQoL and/or work ability outcome in a population with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain, and maybe a useful adjunct to primary care physiotherapy assessment and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02609750; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185232019-01-14 Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care Forsbrand, Malin H Grahn, Birgitta Hill, Jonathan C Petersson, Ingemar F Post Sennehed, Charlotte Stigmar, Kjerstin BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: The predictive ability of the STarT Back Tool (SBT) has not yet been examined among acute/subacute back and/or neck pain in a primary care setting in respect to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work ability outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the SBT’s predictive validity for HRQoL and work ability outcomes at long-term follow-up in a population with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain. SETTING: Prospective data from 35 primary care centres in south Sweden during 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=329) with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain, aged 18–67 years, not on sick leave or <60 days of sick leave completed the SBT when applying for physiotherapy treatment. Long-term follow-up measures (median 13 months, range 11–27 months) of HRQoL (EQ-5D) and work ability (Work Ability Score) was completed by 238 patients (72%). OUTCOMES: The predictive ability of the SBT for HRQoL and work ability outcomes was examined using Kruskal-Wallis test, logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Based on SBT risk group stratification, 103 (43%), 107 (45%) and 28 (12%) patients were considered as low, medium and at high risk, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in HRQoL (p<0.001) and work ability (p<0.001) at follow-up between all three SBT risk groups. Patients in the high risk group had a significantly increased risk of having poor HRQoL (OR 6.16, 95% CI 1.50 to 25.26) and poor work ability (OR 5.08, 95% CI 1.75 to 14.71) vs the low risk group at follow-up. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.84) for HRQoL and 0.68 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.76) for work ability. CONCLUSIONS: The SBT is an appropriate tool for identifying patients with a poor long-term HRQoL and/or work ability outcome in a population with acute/subacute back and/or neck pain, and maybe a useful adjunct to primary care physiotherapy assessment and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02609750; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6318523/ /pubmed/30580256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021748 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Forsbrand, Malin H
Grahn, Birgitta
Hill, Jonathan C
Petersson, Ingemar F
Post Sennehed, Charlotte
Stigmar, Kjerstin
Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title_full Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title_fullStr Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title_short Can the STarT Back Tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? A psychometric validation study in primary care
title_sort can the start back tool predict health-related quality of life and work ability after an acute/subacute episode with back or neck pain? a psychometric validation study in primary care
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30580256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021748
work_keys_str_mv AT forsbrandmalinh canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare
AT grahnbirgitta canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare
AT hilljonathanc canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare
AT peterssoningemarf canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare
AT postsennehedcharlotte canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare
AT stigmarkjerstin canthestartbacktoolpredicthealthrelatedqualityoflifeandworkabilityafteranacutesubacuteepisodewithbackorneckpainapsychometricvalidationstudyinprimarycare