Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients from p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qian, Tianwei, Zhao, Mengya, Wan, Yongjing, Li, MengXiao, Xu, Xun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022700
_version_ 1783384896688881664
author Qian, Tianwei
Zhao, Mengya
Wan, Yongjing
Li, MengXiao
Xu, Xun
author_facet Qian, Tianwei
Zhao, Mengya
Wan, Yongjing
Li, MengXiao
Xu, Xun
author_sort Qian, Tianwei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients from previously reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov until March 2017. Therapeutic effects were estimated using the proportions of patients gaining/losing ≥15 letters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Treatment safety was estimated using the proportions of adverse events, namely increased intraocular pressure (IOP), cataracts, vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and retinal tear. The software ADDIS (V.1.16.8) was used for analysis. Treatment effect and safety of different drugs could be ranked based on simulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs comprising 2060 patients were identified. Regarding patients gaining ≥15 letters, aflibercept and ranibizumab were significantly more effective than sham/placebo at 6 months. Regarding patients losing ≥15 letters at 6 months, ranibizumab showed significant improvement compared with dexamethasone. Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab showed greater improvements in BCVA than sham/placebo at 6 months. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection demonstrated greater CRT reduction than both sham and dexamethasone did. Dexamethasone had a higher risk of increased IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab. Ranibizumab demonstrated a greater risk of cataracts than dexamethasone. Aflibercept and ranibizumab demonstrated low incidence of VH and retinal tear, respectively. Aflibercept had a slight advantage over ranibizumab as assessed by benefit–risk analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF agents have advantages in the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. Aflibercept and ranibizumab showed marked BCVA improvement and CRT reduction. Aflibercept may have a slight advantage over ranibizumab. The results of this study can serve as a reference for clinicians to provide patient-tailored treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064076.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185342019-01-14 Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion Qian, Tianwei Zhao, Mengya Wan, Yongjing Li, MengXiao Xu, Xun BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of macular oedema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Patients from previously reported randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF and corticosteroids for the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.gov until March 2017. Therapeutic effects were estimated using the proportions of patients gaining/losing ≥15 letters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Treatment safety was estimated using the proportions of adverse events, namely increased intraocular pressure (IOP), cataracts, vitreous haemorrhage (VH) and retinal tear. The software ADDIS (V.1.16.8) was used for analysis. Treatment effect and safety of different drugs could be ranked based on simulation. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs comprising 2060 patients were identified. Regarding patients gaining ≥15 letters, aflibercept and ranibizumab were significantly more effective than sham/placebo at 6 months. Regarding patients losing ≥15 letters at 6 months, ranibizumab showed significant improvement compared with dexamethasone. Aflibercept, bevacizumab or ranibizumab showed greater improvements in BCVA than sham/placebo at 6 months. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection demonstrated greater CRT reduction than both sham and dexamethasone did. Dexamethasone had a higher risk of increased IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab. Ranibizumab demonstrated a greater risk of cataracts than dexamethasone. Aflibercept and ranibizumab demonstrated low incidence of VH and retinal tear, respectively. Aflibercept had a slight advantage over ranibizumab as assessed by benefit–risk analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-VEGF agents have advantages in the treatment of ME secondary to CRVO. Aflibercept and ranibizumab showed marked BCVA improvement and CRT reduction. Aflibercept may have a slight advantage over ranibizumab. The results of this study can serve as a reference for clinicians to provide patient-tailored treatment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064076. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6318534/ /pubmed/30593547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022700 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Qian, Tianwei
Zhao, Mengya
Wan, Yongjing
Li, MengXiao
Xu, Xun
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022700
work_keys_str_mv AT qiantianwei comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdrugtherapiesformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT zhaomengya comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdrugtherapiesformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT wanyongjing comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdrugtherapiesformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT limengxiao comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdrugtherapiesformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion
AT xuxun comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofdrugtherapiesformacularedemasecondarytocentralretinalveinocclusion