Cargando…

Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa

INTRODUCTION: There is little credible quantitative data on pregnancy histories and outcomes for disabled women in low-income and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study, based in Cape Town, South Africa, was to test the reliability and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy history and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontes Marx, Mayara, Heap, Marion, Gichane, Margaret W, London, Leslie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023896
_version_ 1783384897635745792
author Fontes Marx, Mayara
Heap, Marion
Gichane, Margaret W
London, Leslie
author_facet Fontes Marx, Mayara
Heap, Marion
Gichane, Margaret W
London, Leslie
author_sort Fontes Marx, Mayara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is little credible quantitative data on pregnancy histories and outcomes for disabled women in low-income and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study, based in Cape Town, South Africa, was to test the reliability and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among a sample of Deaf women who use South African Sign Language (SASL). METHODS: We interviewed 42 signing Deaf women of childbearing age (18–49 years) in SASL using a structured questionnaire in July 2016. To assess reliability, seven participants (16% of the sample) were reinterviewed by different interviewers under the same conditions after 10–30 min. For the analysis we used (1) Cohen’s kappa, an inter-rater statistical method, and (2) overall percentage agreement. Validity was explored by comparing the participants’ pregnancy history to the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) database. RESULTS: The reliability results showed that out of 19 questions 14 demonstrated substantial to perfect agreement kappa scores (kappa between 0.61 and 1) and 5 had the lowest kappa agreement scores (kappa <0.61). With respect to percentage agreement, participants provided identical responses in 87% cases. Overall, women provided more reliable responses to pregnancy outcomes compared with demographic information. Validity results showed that 29 out of 35 Deaf women provided survey responses that matched or nearly matched (83% agreement) the PHDC database for birth history and delivery location. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that for this sample of signing Deaf women recall of pregnancy history and service use is reliable and valid. Extending this approach to other similar populations will require further research, but it is important that methods to access hard-to-reach disabled populations are developed so that health system responsiveness to marginal populations can be based on robust evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185382019-01-14 Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa Fontes Marx, Mayara Heap, Marion Gichane, Margaret W London, Leslie BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: There is little credible quantitative data on pregnancy histories and outcomes for disabled women in low-income and middle-income countries. The purpose of this study, based in Cape Town, South Africa, was to test the reliability and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among a sample of Deaf women who use South African Sign Language (SASL). METHODS: We interviewed 42 signing Deaf women of childbearing age (18–49 years) in SASL using a structured questionnaire in July 2016. To assess reliability, seven participants (16% of the sample) were reinterviewed by different interviewers under the same conditions after 10–30 min. For the analysis we used (1) Cohen’s kappa, an inter-rater statistical method, and (2) overall percentage agreement. Validity was explored by comparing the participants’ pregnancy history to the Western Cape Provincial Health Data Centre (PHDC) database. RESULTS: The reliability results showed that out of 19 questions 14 demonstrated substantial to perfect agreement kappa scores (kappa between 0.61 and 1) and 5 had the lowest kappa agreement scores (kappa <0.61). With respect to percentage agreement, participants provided identical responses in 87% cases. Overall, women provided more reliable responses to pregnancy outcomes compared with demographic information. Validity results showed that 29 out of 35 Deaf women provided survey responses that matched or nearly matched (83% agreement) the PHDC database for birth history and delivery location. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that for this sample of signing Deaf women recall of pregnancy history and service use is reliable and valid. Extending this approach to other similar populations will require further research, but it is important that methods to access hard-to-reach disabled populations are developed so that health system responsiveness to marginal populations can be based on robust evidence. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6318538/ /pubmed/30593553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023896 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Fontes Marx, Mayara
Heap, Marion
Gichane, Margaret W
London, Leslie
Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title_full Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title_short Validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing Deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from South Africa
title_sort validity and reliability of maternal recall of pregnancy history and service use among signing deaf women: a cross-sectional descriptive study from south africa
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023896
work_keys_str_mv AT fontesmarxmayara validityandreliabilityofmaternalrecallofpregnancyhistoryandserviceuseamongsigningdeafwomenacrosssectionaldescriptivestudyfromsouthafrica
AT heapmarion validityandreliabilityofmaternalrecallofpregnancyhistoryandserviceuseamongsigningdeafwomenacrosssectionaldescriptivestudyfromsouthafrica
AT gichanemargaretw validityandreliabilityofmaternalrecallofpregnancyhistoryandserviceuseamongsigningdeafwomenacrosssectionaldescriptivestudyfromsouthafrica
AT londonleslie validityandreliabilityofmaternalrecallofpregnancyhistoryandserviceuseamongsigningdeafwomenacrosssectionaldescriptivestudyfromsouthafrica