Cargando…

Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()

PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernal-Molina, Paula, Esteve-Taboada, José J., Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa, Montés-Micó, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002
_version_ 1783384898329903104
author Bernal-Molina, Paula
Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
Montés-Micó, Robert
author_facet Bernal-Molina, Paula
Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
Montés-Micó, Robert
author_sort Bernal-Molina, Paula
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 41 years participated in this experimental study. The accommodative response (AR) of the eye while reading a text with BoW or WoB contrast polarity was obtained objectively with an adaptive optics system that corrected all aberrations but subject's own. Two different letter sizes (visual acuity conditions), shown on a microdisplay, were tested. The AR of each eye was measured with its natural pupil diameter at 0–3 D of accommodative demand from the far point of the eye, with a step of 0.5 D. The slope of the stimulus–response curve was calculated for each subject and condition. RESULTS: The averaged maximum pupil size was bigger for reverse (WoB) than for normal (BoW) contrast with statistical significance. The slopes for the ARs of the four conditions were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast polarity does not seem to influence the accommodative response when reading text from an electronic microdisplay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185412019-01-09 Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() Bernal-Molina, Paula Esteve-Taboada, José J. Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa Montés-Micó, Robert J Optom Original article PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 41 years participated in this experimental study. The accommodative response (AR) of the eye while reading a text with BoW or WoB contrast polarity was obtained objectively with an adaptive optics system that corrected all aberrations but subject's own. Two different letter sizes (visual acuity conditions), shown on a microdisplay, were tested. The AR of each eye was measured with its natural pupil diameter at 0–3 D of accommodative demand from the far point of the eye, with a step of 0.5 D. The slope of the stimulus–response curve was calculated for each subject and condition. RESULTS: The averaged maximum pupil size was bigger for reverse (WoB) than for normal (BoW) contrast with statistical significance. The slopes for the ARs of the four conditions were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast polarity does not seem to influence the accommodative response when reading text from an electronic microdisplay. Elsevier 2019 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6318541/ /pubmed/29627300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002 Text en © 2018 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Bernal-Molina, Paula
Esteve-Taboada, José J.
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
Montés-Micó, Robert
Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title_full Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title_fullStr Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title_full_unstemmed Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title_short Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
title_sort influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bernalmolinapaula influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse
AT estevetaboadajosej influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse
AT ferrerblascoteresa influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse
AT montesmicorobert influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse