Cargando…
Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response()
PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002 |
_version_ | 1783384898329903104 |
---|---|
author | Bernal-Molina, Paula Esteve-Taboada, José J. Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa Montés-Micó, Robert |
author_facet | Bernal-Molina, Paula Esteve-Taboada, José J. Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa Montés-Micó, Robert |
author_sort | Bernal-Molina, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 41 years participated in this experimental study. The accommodative response (AR) of the eye while reading a text with BoW or WoB contrast polarity was obtained objectively with an adaptive optics system that corrected all aberrations but subject's own. Two different letter sizes (visual acuity conditions), shown on a microdisplay, were tested. The AR of each eye was measured with its natural pupil diameter at 0–3 D of accommodative demand from the far point of the eye, with a step of 0.5 D. The slope of the stimulus–response curve was calculated for each subject and condition. RESULTS: The averaged maximum pupil size was bigger for reverse (WoB) than for normal (BoW) contrast with statistical significance. The slopes for the ARs of the four conditions were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast polarity does not seem to influence the accommodative response when reading text from an electronic microdisplay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6318541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63185412019-01-09 Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() Bernal-Molina, Paula Esteve-Taboada, José J. Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa Montés-Micó, Robert J Optom Original article PURPOSE: To assess the changes in the accommodative response of the eye while reading a text under different contrast polarity conditions: black letters on white background (BoW condition) and white letters on black background (WoB condition). METHODS: Eighteen subjects with ages ranging from 21 to 41 years participated in this experimental study. The accommodative response (AR) of the eye while reading a text with BoW or WoB contrast polarity was obtained objectively with an adaptive optics system that corrected all aberrations but subject's own. Two different letter sizes (visual acuity conditions), shown on a microdisplay, were tested. The AR of each eye was measured with its natural pupil diameter at 0–3 D of accommodative demand from the far point of the eye, with a step of 0.5 D. The slope of the stimulus–response curve was calculated for each subject and condition. RESULTS: The averaged maximum pupil size was bigger for reverse (WoB) than for normal (BoW) contrast with statistical significance. The slopes for the ARs of the four conditions were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast polarity does not seem to influence the accommodative response when reading text from an electronic microdisplay. Elsevier 2019 2018-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6318541/ /pubmed/29627300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002 Text en © 2018 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Bernal-Molina, Paula Esteve-Taboada, José J. Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa Montés-Micó, Robert Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title | Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title_full | Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title_fullStr | Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title_short | Influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
title_sort | influence of contrast polarity on the accommodative response() |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29627300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernalmolinapaula influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse AT estevetaboadajosej influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse AT ferrerblascoteresa influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse AT montesmicorobert influenceofcontrastpolarityontheaccommodativeresponse |