Cargando…

Effect of phenylephrine on static and dynamic accommodation

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that changes in accommodation after instillation of Phenylephrine Hydrochloride (PHCl) observed in some studies could be caused by changes in optics. METHODS: We performed two experiments to test the effects of PHCl on static and on dynamic accommodation in 8 and 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Del Águila-Carrasco, Antonio J., Lara, Francisco, Bernal-Molina, Paula, Riquelme-Nicolás, Resurrección, Marín-Franch, Iván, Esteve-Taboada, José J., Montés-Micó, Robert, Kruger, Philip B., López-Gil, Norberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29602687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.01.005
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that changes in accommodation after instillation of Phenylephrine Hydrochloride (PHCl) observed in some studies could be caused by changes in optics. METHODS: We performed two experiments to test the effects of PHCl on static and on dynamic accommodation in 8 and 6 subjects, respectively. Objective wavefront measurements were recorded of the static accommodation response to a stimulus at different distances or dynamic accommodation response to a sinusoidally moving stimulus (between 1 and 3 D of accommodative demand at 0.2 Hz). The responses were characterized using two methods: one that takes into account the mydriatic optical effects on the accommodation produced by higher-order aberrations of the eye and another that takes into account only power changes paraxially due to the action of the ciliary muscle and regardless of the pupil size. RESULTS: When mydriatic optical effects were taken into account, differences in responses before and after PHCl instillation were 0.51±0.53 D, and 0.12±0.15, for static and dynamic accommodation, respectively, and were statistically significant (p<0.039). When mydriatic optical effects were not taken into account, the differences in responses before and after PHCl instillation were −0.20±0.51 D, and −0.05±0.14, for static and dynamic accommodation, respectively, and were not statistically significant (p>0.313). CONCLUSIONS: The mydriatic effect of the PHCl causes optical changes in the eye that can reduce the objective and subjective measurement of accommodation.