Cargando…

Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age

PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Irving, Elizabeth L., Machan, Carolyn M., Lam, Sharon, Hrynchak, Patricia K., Lillakas, Linda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29567041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002
_version_ 1783384899024060416
author Irving, Elizabeth L.
Machan, Carolyn M.
Lam, Sharon
Hrynchak, Patricia K.
Lillakas, Linda
author_facet Irving, Elizabeth L.
Machan, Carolyn M.
Lam, Sharon
Hrynchak, Patricia K.
Lillakas, Linda
author_sort Irving, Elizabeth L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affecting refraction were abstracted from the Waterloo Eye Study database (WatES). Average MOR, standard deviation of MOR and astigmatism were assessed in relation to age. Refractive distributions for developmental age groups were determined. MOR standard deviation relative to average MOR was evaluated. Data from earlier clinically based studies with similar age ranges were compared to WatES. RESULTS: Right eye refractive errors were available for 5933 patients with no history of surgery affecting refraction. Average MOR varied with age. Children <1 yr of age were the most hyperopic (+1.79 D) and the highest magnitude of myopia was found at 27yrs (−2.86 D). MOR distributions were leptokurtic, and negatively skewed. The mode varied with age group. MOR variability increased with increasing myopia. Average astigmatism increased gradually to age 60 after which it increased at a faster rate. By 85+ years it was 1.25 D. J(0) power vector became increasingly negative with age. J(45) power vector values remained close to zero but variability increased at approximately 70 years. In relation to comparable earlier studies, WatES data were most myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Mean ocular refraction and refractive error distribution vary with age. The highest magnitude of myopia is found in young adults. Similar to prevalence, the severity of myopia also appears to have increased since 1931.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63185442019-01-09 Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age Irving, Elizabeth L. Machan, Carolyn M. Lam, Sharon Hrynchak, Patricia K. Lillakas, Linda J Optom Original article PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affecting refraction were abstracted from the Waterloo Eye Study database (WatES). Average MOR, standard deviation of MOR and astigmatism were assessed in relation to age. Refractive distributions for developmental age groups were determined. MOR standard deviation relative to average MOR was evaluated. Data from earlier clinically based studies with similar age ranges were compared to WatES. RESULTS: Right eye refractive errors were available for 5933 patients with no history of surgery affecting refraction. Average MOR varied with age. Children <1 yr of age were the most hyperopic (+1.79 D) and the highest magnitude of myopia was found at 27yrs (−2.86 D). MOR distributions were leptokurtic, and negatively skewed. The mode varied with age group. MOR variability increased with increasing myopia. Average astigmatism increased gradually to age 60 after which it increased at a faster rate. By 85+ years it was 1.25 D. J(0) power vector became increasingly negative with age. J(45) power vector values remained close to zero but variability increased at approximately 70 years. In relation to comparable earlier studies, WatES data were most myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Mean ocular refraction and refractive error distribution vary with age. The highest magnitude of myopia is found in young adults. Similar to prevalence, the severity of myopia also appears to have increased since 1931. Elsevier 2019 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6318544/ /pubmed/29567041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
Irving, Elizabeth L.
Machan, Carolyn M.
Lam, Sharon
Hrynchak, Patricia K.
Lillakas, Linda
Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title_full Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title_fullStr Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title_full_unstemmed Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title_short Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
title_sort refractive error magnitude and variability: relation to age
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29567041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT irvingelizabethl refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage
AT machancarolynm refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage
AT lamsharon refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage
AT hrynchakpatriciak refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage
AT lillakaslinda refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage