Cargando…
Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age
PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affec...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29567041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002 |
_version_ | 1783384899024060416 |
---|---|
author | Irving, Elizabeth L. Machan, Carolyn M. Lam, Sharon Hrynchak, Patricia K. Lillakas, Linda |
author_facet | Irving, Elizabeth L. Machan, Carolyn M. Lam, Sharon Hrynchak, Patricia K. Lillakas, Linda |
author_sort | Irving, Elizabeth L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affecting refraction were abstracted from the Waterloo Eye Study database (WatES). Average MOR, standard deviation of MOR and astigmatism were assessed in relation to age. Refractive distributions for developmental age groups were determined. MOR standard deviation relative to average MOR was evaluated. Data from earlier clinically based studies with similar age ranges were compared to WatES. RESULTS: Right eye refractive errors were available for 5933 patients with no history of surgery affecting refraction. Average MOR varied with age. Children <1 yr of age were the most hyperopic (+1.79 D) and the highest magnitude of myopia was found at 27yrs (−2.86 D). MOR distributions were leptokurtic, and negatively skewed. The mode varied with age group. MOR variability increased with increasing myopia. Average astigmatism increased gradually to age 60 after which it increased at a faster rate. By 85+ years it was 1.25 D. J(0) power vector became increasingly negative with age. J(45) power vector values remained close to zero but variability increased at approximately 70 years. In relation to comparable earlier studies, WatES data were most myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Mean ocular refraction and refractive error distribution vary with age. The highest magnitude of myopia is found in young adults. Similar to prevalence, the severity of myopia also appears to have increased since 1931. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6318544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63185442019-01-09 Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age Irving, Elizabeth L. Machan, Carolyn M. Lam, Sharon Hrynchak, Patricia K. Lillakas, Linda J Optom Original article PURPOSE: To investigate mean ocular refraction (MOR) and astigmatism, over the human age range and compare severity of refractive error to earlier studies from clinical populations having large age ranges. METHODS: For this descriptive study patient age, refractive error and history of surgery affecting refraction were abstracted from the Waterloo Eye Study database (WatES). Average MOR, standard deviation of MOR and astigmatism were assessed in relation to age. Refractive distributions for developmental age groups were determined. MOR standard deviation relative to average MOR was evaluated. Data from earlier clinically based studies with similar age ranges were compared to WatES. RESULTS: Right eye refractive errors were available for 5933 patients with no history of surgery affecting refraction. Average MOR varied with age. Children <1 yr of age were the most hyperopic (+1.79 D) and the highest magnitude of myopia was found at 27yrs (−2.86 D). MOR distributions were leptokurtic, and negatively skewed. The mode varied with age group. MOR variability increased with increasing myopia. Average astigmatism increased gradually to age 60 after which it increased at a faster rate. By 85+ years it was 1.25 D. J(0) power vector became increasingly negative with age. J(45) power vector values remained close to zero but variability increased at approximately 70 years. In relation to comparable earlier studies, WatES data were most myopic. CONCLUSIONS: Mean ocular refraction and refractive error distribution vary with age. The highest magnitude of myopia is found in young adults. Similar to prevalence, the severity of myopia also appears to have increased since 1931. Elsevier 2019 2018-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6318544/ /pubmed/29567041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Irving, Elizabeth L. Machan, Carolyn M. Lam, Sharon Hrynchak, Patricia K. Lillakas, Linda Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title | Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title_full | Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title_fullStr | Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title_full_unstemmed | Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title_short | Refractive error magnitude and variability: Relation to age |
title_sort | refractive error magnitude and variability: relation to age |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29567041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2018.02.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irvingelizabethl refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage AT machancarolynm refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage AT lamsharon refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage AT hrynchakpatriciak refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage AT lillakaslinda refractiveerrormagnitudeandvariabilityrelationtoage |