Cargando…
Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study
BACKGROUND: Long-term needs of stroke survivors are often not adequately addressed and many patients are dissatisfied with care post-discharge from hospital. Primary care could play an important role in identifying need in people with stroke. AIM: We aimed to explore, refine and test the feasibility...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3 |
_version_ | 1783384971572936704 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Grace M. Mullis, Ricky Lim, Lisa Kreit, Lizzie Mant, Jonathan |
author_facet | Turner, Grace M. Mullis, Ricky Lim, Lisa Kreit, Lizzie Mant, Jonathan |
author_sort | Turner, Grace M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Long-term needs of stroke survivors are often not adequately addressed and many patients are dissatisfied with care post-discharge from hospital. Primary care could play an important role in identifying need in people with stroke. AIM: We aimed to explore, refine and test the feasibility and acceptability of a post-stroke checklist for stroke reviews in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Focus groups (using a generic qualitative approach) and a single-centre feasibility study. METHOD: Five focus groups were conducted; three with healthcare providers and two with stroke survivors/carers. The focus groups discussed acceptability of a checklist approach and the content of an existing checklist. The checklist was then modified and piloted in one general practice surgery in the East of England. RESULTS: The qualitative data found the concept of a checklist was considered valuable to standardise stroke reviews and prevent post-stroke problems being missed. Items were identified that were missing from the original checklist: return to work, fatigue, intimate relationships and social activities. Time constraints was the main concern from healthcare professionals and pre-completion of the checklist was suggested to address this. Thirteen stroke survivors were recruited to the feasibility study. The modified checklist was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients and primary care clinicians and resulted in agreed action plans. CONCLUSION: The modified post-stroke checklist is a pragmatic and feasible approach to identify problems post-stroke and facilitate referral to appropriate support services. The checklist is a potentially valuable tool to structure stroke reviews using a patient-centred approach. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6318919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63189192019-01-08 Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study Turner, Grace M. Mullis, Ricky Lim, Lisa Kreit, Lizzie Mant, Jonathan BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Long-term needs of stroke survivors are often not adequately addressed and many patients are dissatisfied with care post-discharge from hospital. Primary care could play an important role in identifying need in people with stroke. AIM: We aimed to explore, refine and test the feasibility and acceptability of a post-stroke checklist for stroke reviews in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Focus groups (using a generic qualitative approach) and a single-centre feasibility study. METHOD: Five focus groups were conducted; three with healthcare providers and two with stroke survivors/carers. The focus groups discussed acceptability of a checklist approach and the content of an existing checklist. The checklist was then modified and piloted in one general practice surgery in the East of England. RESULTS: The qualitative data found the concept of a checklist was considered valuable to standardise stroke reviews and prevent post-stroke problems being missed. Items were identified that were missing from the original checklist: return to work, fatigue, intimate relationships and social activities. Time constraints was the main concern from healthcare professionals and pre-completion of the checklist was suggested to address this. Thirteen stroke survivors were recruited to the feasibility study. The modified checklist was found to be feasible and acceptable to patients and primary care clinicians and resulted in agreed action plans. CONCLUSION: The modified post-stroke checklist is a pragmatic and feasible approach to identify problems post-stroke and facilitate referral to appropriate support services. The checklist is a potentially valuable tool to structure stroke reviews using a patient-centred approach. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6318919/ /pubmed/30609920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Turner, Grace M. Mullis, Ricky Lim, Lisa Kreit, Lizzie Mant, Jonathan Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title | Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title_full | Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title_short | Using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
title_sort | using a checklist to facilitate management of long-term care needs after stroke: insights from focus groups and a feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0894-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnergracem usingachecklisttofacilitatemanagementoflongtermcareneedsafterstrokeinsightsfromfocusgroupsandafeasibilitystudy AT mullisricky usingachecklisttofacilitatemanagementoflongtermcareneedsafterstrokeinsightsfromfocusgroupsandafeasibilitystudy AT limlisa usingachecklisttofacilitatemanagementoflongtermcareneedsafterstrokeinsightsfromfocusgroupsandafeasibilitystudy AT kreitlizzie usingachecklisttofacilitatemanagementoflongtermcareneedsafterstrokeinsightsfromfocusgroupsandafeasibilitystudy AT mantjonathan usingachecklisttofacilitatemanagementoflongtermcareneedsafterstrokeinsightsfromfocusgroupsandafeasibilitystudy |