Cargando…

Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review

BACKGROUND: Understanding students’ learning styles, and modifying teaching styles and material accordingly, is an essential to delivering quality education. Knowing more about the learning styles of physiotherapy learners will assist educators’ planning and delivering of learning activities. The pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stander, Jessica, Grimmer, Karen, Brink, Yolandi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30606180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5
_version_ 1783384985910116352
author Stander, Jessica
Grimmer, Karen
Brink, Yolandi
author_facet Stander, Jessica
Grimmer, Karen
Brink, Yolandi
author_sort Stander, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding students’ learning styles, and modifying teaching styles and material accordingly, is an essential to delivering quality education. Knowing more about the learning styles of physiotherapy learners will assist educators’ planning and delivering of learning activities. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore what is published about physiotherapy learning styles. METHODS: An adapted Arksey and O’Malley framework was applied to undertake this systematic scoping review. Nine electronic databases (CINAHL, BIOMED CENTRAL, Cochrane, Web of Science, PROQUEST, PubMed, OTseeker, Scopus, ERIC) were searched using the keywords: ‘learning styles’ and ‘physiotherapy’. English-language, primary research articles that investigated physiotherapy learners’ learning styles were sought. RESULTS: Of 396 potentially-relevant articles, 15 were included in this review. The studies mostly reflected undergraduate students (910 undergraduates, 361 postgraduates, 23 professionals), in developed countries. Nine articles used the Kolb’s experiential learning theory (ELT); one study applied Honey and Mumford’s approach; two studies used the Gregorc model of cognition and three studies did not specify an underlying theory. Outcome measures included different versions of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, the visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic questionnaire, Gregorc style delineator, Felder Silverman’s Index of Learning Survey, and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Style Questionnaire. The preferred physiotherapy learning styles, according to the ELT, seem to be Converger (learns “hands-on” and applying previously attained knowledge) and Assimilator (gathers and organises information to make the most sense). CONCLUSIONS: Both physiotherapy learners and physiotherapists have specific learning styles of active participation, underpinned with practical examples of theoretical concepts. More research is needed in developing countries, and on postgraduate and professional physiotherapy learners’ learning styles. Also, further research should focus on defining and describing physiotherapy learning styles in a way to be used as an industry standard; and developing valid and reliable learning style outcome measures applicable across physiotherapy learners and settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63189812019-01-08 Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review Stander, Jessica Grimmer, Karen Brink, Yolandi BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding students’ learning styles, and modifying teaching styles and material accordingly, is an essential to delivering quality education. Knowing more about the learning styles of physiotherapy learners will assist educators’ planning and delivering of learning activities. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore what is published about physiotherapy learning styles. METHODS: An adapted Arksey and O’Malley framework was applied to undertake this systematic scoping review. Nine electronic databases (CINAHL, BIOMED CENTRAL, Cochrane, Web of Science, PROQUEST, PubMed, OTseeker, Scopus, ERIC) were searched using the keywords: ‘learning styles’ and ‘physiotherapy’. English-language, primary research articles that investigated physiotherapy learners’ learning styles were sought. RESULTS: Of 396 potentially-relevant articles, 15 were included in this review. The studies mostly reflected undergraduate students (910 undergraduates, 361 postgraduates, 23 professionals), in developed countries. Nine articles used the Kolb’s experiential learning theory (ELT); one study applied Honey and Mumford’s approach; two studies used the Gregorc model of cognition and three studies did not specify an underlying theory. Outcome measures included different versions of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, the visual-aural-read/write-kinesthetic questionnaire, Gregorc style delineator, Felder Silverman’s Index of Learning Survey, and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Style Questionnaire. The preferred physiotherapy learning styles, according to the ELT, seem to be Converger (learns “hands-on” and applying previously attained knowledge) and Assimilator (gathers and organises information to make the most sense). CONCLUSIONS: Both physiotherapy learners and physiotherapists have specific learning styles of active participation, underpinned with practical examples of theoretical concepts. More research is needed in developing countries, and on postgraduate and professional physiotherapy learners’ learning styles. Also, further research should focus on defining and describing physiotherapy learning styles in a way to be used as an industry standard; and developing valid and reliable learning style outcome measures applicable across physiotherapy learners and settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6318981/ /pubmed/30606180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stander, Jessica
Grimmer, Karen
Brink, Yolandi
Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title_full Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title_fullStr Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title_short Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
title_sort learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30606180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5
work_keys_str_mv AT standerjessica learningstylesofphysiotherapistsasystematicscopingreview
AT grimmerkaren learningstylesofphysiotherapistsasystematicscopingreview
AT brinkyolandi learningstylesofphysiotherapistsasystematicscopingreview