Cargando…

Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study

Prolonged static sitting in wheelchairs increases the risk of pressure ulcers. This exploratory study proposed three dynamic sitting techniques in order to reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcer during wheelchair sitting, namely lumbar prominent dynamic sitting, femur upward dynamic sitting, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Chun-Ting, Chen, Yen-Nien, Tseng, Yen-Ting, Tsai, Kuen-Horng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30606212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0621-2
_version_ 1783384988499050496
author Li, Chun-Ting
Chen, Yen-Nien
Tseng, Yen-Ting
Tsai, Kuen-Horng
author_facet Li, Chun-Ting
Chen, Yen-Nien
Tseng, Yen-Ting
Tsai, Kuen-Horng
author_sort Li, Chun-Ting
collection PubMed
description Prolonged static sitting in wheelchairs increases the risk of pressure ulcers. This exploratory study proposed three dynamic sitting techniques in order to reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcer during wheelchair sitting, namely lumbar prominent dynamic sitting, femur upward dynamic sitting, and lumbar prominent with femur upward dynamic sitting. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of these three techniques on interface pressure. 15 able-bodied people were recruited as subjects to compare the aforementioned sitting techniques in a random order. All parameters, including dynamic contact area, dynamic average pressure, and dynamic peak pressure on backrest and seat were measured and compared. In result, when compared with lumbar prominent dynamic sitting, femur upward dynamic sitting and lumbar prominent with femur upward dynamic sitting appeared to yield significantly lower dynamic average and peak pressure on the back part of seat, and significantly higher dynamic average and peak pressure on the front part of seat. This study can serve as a reference point for clinical physicians or wheelchair users to identify a suitable dynamic sitting technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6318992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63189922019-01-08 Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study Li, Chun-Ting Chen, Yen-Nien Tseng, Yen-Ting Tsai, Kuen-Horng Biomed Eng Online Research Prolonged static sitting in wheelchairs increases the risk of pressure ulcers. This exploratory study proposed three dynamic sitting techniques in order to reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcer during wheelchair sitting, namely lumbar prominent dynamic sitting, femur upward dynamic sitting, and lumbar prominent with femur upward dynamic sitting. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effects of these three techniques on interface pressure. 15 able-bodied people were recruited as subjects to compare the aforementioned sitting techniques in a random order. All parameters, including dynamic contact area, dynamic average pressure, and dynamic peak pressure on backrest and seat were measured and compared. In result, when compared with lumbar prominent dynamic sitting, femur upward dynamic sitting and lumbar prominent with femur upward dynamic sitting appeared to yield significantly lower dynamic average and peak pressure on the back part of seat, and significantly higher dynamic average and peak pressure on the front part of seat. This study can serve as a reference point for clinical physicians or wheelchair users to identify a suitable dynamic sitting technique. BioMed Central 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6318992/ /pubmed/30606212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0621-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Chun-Ting
Chen, Yen-Nien
Tseng, Yen-Ting
Tsai, Kuen-Horng
Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title_full Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title_short Biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
title_sort biomechanical analysis of different dynamic sitting techniques: an exploratory study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6318992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30606212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0621-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lichunting biomechanicalanalysisofdifferentdynamicsittingtechniquesanexploratorystudy
AT chenyennien biomechanicalanalysisofdifferentdynamicsittingtechniquesanexploratorystudy
AT tsengyenting biomechanicalanalysisofdifferentdynamicsittingtechniquesanexploratorystudy
AT tsaikuenhorng biomechanicalanalysisofdifferentdynamicsittingtechniquesanexploratorystudy