Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2 (α(2))-adrenergic receptor agonist, has been used to blunt the hemodynamic response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, which is a common concern for the anesthesiologist, especially in high-risk patients and geriatric age group. AIM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keshri, Ravi Kumar, Prasad, Mukesh Kumar, Choudhary, Amit Kumar, Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh, Singh, Yashowardhan, Kapoor, Kali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662127
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_156_18
_version_ 1783385008309796864
author Keshri, Ravi Kumar
Prasad, Mukesh Kumar
Choudhary, Amit Kumar
Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh
Singh, Yashowardhan
Kapoor, Kali
author_facet Keshri, Ravi Kumar
Prasad, Mukesh Kumar
Choudhary, Amit Kumar
Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh
Singh, Yashowardhan
Kapoor, Kali
author_sort Keshri, Ravi Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2 (α(2))-adrenergic receptor agonist, has been used to blunt the hemodynamic response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, which is a common concern for the anesthesiologist, especially in high-risk patients and geriatric age group. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The current study is to evaluate and compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine in controlling hemodynamic response during tracheal intubation in geriatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After getting approval from the Ethical Committee, 90 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classes I and II, aged ≥60 years, were randomly assigned into three groups: Group I (normal saline, n = 30), Group II – dexmedetomidine (0.50 μg/kg, n = 30), and Group III – dexmedetomidine (1.00 μg/kg, n = 30). Dexmedetomidine was infused for 10 min before induction. Data were recorded as before infusion (T0), at the end of infusion (T1), before tracheal intubation (T2), at the moment of tracheal intubation (T3) 5 min after tracheal intubation (T4), and 10 min after tracheal intubation (T5). Modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale score was observed at the time of T0 and T1. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was statistically significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group II and III at T2, T3, and T4. Mean heart rate (HR) value was significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group III from T1 to T5, whereas there was no significant change in HR between Group I and Group II and at T4 and T5 h was comparable in Group II and Group III. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that more acceptable hemodynamic changes were seen with 0.50 μg/kg dexmedetomidine when compared with 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine during intubation. A lower dose besides being cost-effective is also free of side effects associated with the higher dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6319078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63190782019-01-18 Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study Keshri, Ravi Kumar Prasad, Mukesh Kumar Choudhary, Amit Kumar Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh Singh, Yashowardhan Kapoor, Kali Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha 2 (α(2))-adrenergic receptor agonist, has been used to blunt the hemodynamic response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, which is a common concern for the anesthesiologist, especially in high-risk patients and geriatric age group. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The current study is to evaluate and compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine in controlling hemodynamic response during tracheal intubation in geriatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After getting approval from the Ethical Committee, 90 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classes I and II, aged ≥60 years, were randomly assigned into three groups: Group I (normal saline, n = 30), Group II – dexmedetomidine (0.50 μg/kg, n = 30), and Group III – dexmedetomidine (1.00 μg/kg, n = 30). Dexmedetomidine was infused for 10 min before induction. Data were recorded as before infusion (T0), at the end of infusion (T1), before tracheal intubation (T2), at the moment of tracheal intubation (T3) 5 min after tracheal intubation (T4), and 10 min after tracheal intubation (T5). Modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale score was observed at the time of T0 and T1. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Mean systolic blood pressure was statistically significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group II and III at T2, T3, and T4. Mean heart rate (HR) value was significantly (P < 0.05) more among Group I compared to Group III from T1 to T5, whereas there was no significant change in HR between Group I and Group II and at T4 and T5 h was comparable in Group II and Group III. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that more acceptable hemodynamic changes were seen with 0.50 μg/kg dexmedetomidine when compared with 1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine during intubation. A lower dose besides being cost-effective is also free of side effects associated with the higher dose of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6319078/ /pubmed/30662127 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_156_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Keshri, Ravi Kumar
Prasad, Mukesh Kumar
Choudhary, Amit Kumar
Jheetay, Gurdeep Singh
Singh, Yashowardhan
Kapoor, Kali
Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Different Doses of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Spine Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of different doses of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in geriatric patients undergoing spine surgeries: a prospective, double-blind study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662127
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_156_18
work_keys_str_mv AT keshriravikumar comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy
AT prasadmukeshkumar comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy
AT choudharyamitkumar comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy
AT jheetaygurdeepsingh comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy
AT singhyashowardhan comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy
AT kapoorkali comparativeevaluationofdifferentdosesofintravenousdexmedetomidineonhemodynamicresponseduringlaryngoscopyandendotrachealintubationingeriatricpatientsundergoingspinesurgeriesaprospectivedoubleblindstudy