Cargando…
Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK
INTRODUCTION: The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG), hosted by the Royal College of Physicians, London, oversees the quality assurance of endoscopy services across the UK. Additional questions focusing on the pressures faced by endoscopy units to meet targets were added to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2018-100970 |
_version_ | 1783385023636832256 |
---|---|
author | Shenbagaraj, Lavanya Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Stebbing, John Broughton, Raphael Dron, Michael Johnston, Debbie Shaw, Tim Haboubi, Hasan Nadim Green, John T |
author_facet | Shenbagaraj, Lavanya Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Stebbing, John Broughton, Raphael Dron, Michael Johnston, Debbie Shaw, Tim Haboubi, Hasan Nadim Green, John T |
author_sort | Shenbagaraj, Lavanya |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG), hosted by the Royal College of Physicians, London, oversees the quality assurance of endoscopy services across the UK. Additional questions focusing on the pressures faced by endoscopy units to meet targets were added to the 2017 annual Global Rating Scale (GRS) return. This provides a unique insight into endoscopy services across all nations of the UK involving the acute and non-acute Nation Health Service sector as well as the independent sector. METHODS: All 508 services who are registered with JAG were asked to complete every field of the survey online in order to submit their completed April 2017 GRS return. RESULTS: A number of services reported difficulty in meeting national waiting time targets with a national average of only 55% of units meeting urgent cancer wait targets. Many services were insourcing or outsourcing patients to external providers to improve waiting times. Services are striving hard to increase capacity by backfilling lists and working weekends. Data collection was done in most units to reflect productivity but not to look at demand and capacity. Some of the units did not have an agreed capacity plan. The Did Not Attend rates for patients in the bowel cancer screening programme were much lower compared with standard lists. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the increased pressure endoscopy services are under and the ‘just about coping’ situation. This is the first published overview of different aspects of UK-wide endoscopy services and the future challenges. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6319153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63191532019-07-29 Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK Shenbagaraj, Lavanya Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Stebbing, John Broughton, Raphael Dron, Michael Johnston, Debbie Shaw, Tim Haboubi, Hasan Nadim Green, John T Frontline Gastroenterol Endoscopy INTRODUCTION: The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG), hosted by the Royal College of Physicians, London, oversees the quality assurance of endoscopy services across the UK. Additional questions focusing on the pressures faced by endoscopy units to meet targets were added to the 2017 annual Global Rating Scale (GRS) return. This provides a unique insight into endoscopy services across all nations of the UK involving the acute and non-acute Nation Health Service sector as well as the independent sector. METHODS: All 508 services who are registered with JAG were asked to complete every field of the survey online in order to submit their completed April 2017 GRS return. RESULTS: A number of services reported difficulty in meeting national waiting time targets with a national average of only 55% of units meeting urgent cancer wait targets. Many services were insourcing or outsourcing patients to external providers to improve waiting times. Services are striving hard to increase capacity by backfilling lists and working weekends. Data collection was done in most units to reflect productivity but not to look at demand and capacity. Some of the units did not have an agreed capacity plan. The Did Not Attend rates for patients in the bowel cancer screening programme were much lower compared with standard lists. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the increased pressure endoscopy services are under and the ‘just about coping’ situation. This is the first published overview of different aspects of UK-wide endoscopy services and the future challenges. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-01 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6319153/ /pubmed/30651952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2018-100970 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Endoscopy Shenbagaraj, Lavanya Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Stebbing, John Broughton, Raphael Dron, Michael Johnston, Debbie Shaw, Tim Haboubi, Hasan Nadim Green, John T Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title | Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title_full | Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title_fullStr | Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title_short | Endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the UK |
title_sort | endoscopy in 2017: a national survey of practice in the uk |
topic | Endoscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2018-100970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenbagarajlavanya endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT thomasgibsonsiwan endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT stebbingjohn endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT broughtonraphael endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT dronmichael endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT johnstondebbie endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT shawtim endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT haboubihasannadim endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk AT greenjohnt endoscopyin2017anationalsurveyofpracticeintheuk |