Cargando…

The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanai, Nobuhiro, Sawabe, Michi, Kimura, Takahiro, Suzuki, Hidenori, Ozawa, Taijiro, Hirakawa, Hitoshi, Fukuda, Yujiro, Hasegawa, Yasuhisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651931
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438
_version_ 1783385054429315072
author Hanai, Nobuhiro
Sawabe, Michi
Kimura, Takahiro
Suzuki, Hidenori
Ozawa, Taijiro
Hirakawa, Hitoshi
Fukuda, Yujiro
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa
author_facet Hanai, Nobuhiro
Sawabe, Michi
Kimura, Takahiro
Suzuki, Hidenori
Ozawa, Taijiro
Hirakawa, Hitoshi
Fukuda, Yujiro
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa
author_sort Hanai, Nobuhiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the impact of the mGPS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) in 129 patients with HNC treated at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital from 2012-2013. The mGPS was calculated as follows: mGPS of 0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl; 1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl; 2, CRP>1.0 mg/dl and albumin <3.5 mg/dl. Regarding the HS-mGPS, the CRP threshold level was set as 0.3 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prognosis of HNC worsened significantly as both the mGPS and HS-mGPS increased in a univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the HS-mGPS was significantly associated with the OS (adjusted HR for HS-mGPS of 2 compared to an HS-mGPS of 0 [HR(score2-0)] 3.14 [95% CI: 1.23-8.07], P(trend) < 0.001), while the mGPS was suggested to be associated with the survival (HR(score2-0) 2.37 [95% CI:0.89-6.33], P(trend) = 0.145). Even after stratification by clinical covariates, these associations persisted. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the HS-mGPS is useful as an independent prognostic factor in HNC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6319335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63193352019-01-16 The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer Hanai, Nobuhiro Sawabe, Michi Kimura, Takahiro Suzuki, Hidenori Ozawa, Taijiro Hirakawa, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yujiro Hasegawa, Yasuhisa Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the impact of the mGPS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) in 129 patients with HNC treated at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital from 2012-2013. The mGPS was calculated as follows: mGPS of 0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl; 1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl; 2, CRP>1.0 mg/dl and albumin <3.5 mg/dl. Regarding the HS-mGPS, the CRP threshold level was set as 0.3 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prognosis of HNC worsened significantly as both the mGPS and HS-mGPS increased in a univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the HS-mGPS was significantly associated with the OS (adjusted HR for HS-mGPS of 2 compared to an HS-mGPS of 0 [HR(score2-0)] 3.14 [95% CI: 1.23-8.07], P(trend) < 0.001), while the mGPS was suggested to be associated with the survival (HR(score2-0) 2.37 [95% CI:0.89-6.33], P(trend) = 0.145). Even after stratification by clinical covariates, these associations persisted. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the HS-mGPS is useful as an independent prognostic factor in HNC. Impact Journals LLC 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6319335/ /pubmed/30651931 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Hanai et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hanai, Nobuhiro
Sawabe, Michi
Kimura, Takahiro
Suzuki, Hidenori
Ozawa, Taijiro
Hirakawa, Hitoshi
Fukuda, Yujiro
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa
The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title_full The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title_fullStr The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title_short The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
title_sort high-sensitivity modified glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651931
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438
work_keys_str_mv AT hanainobuhiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT sawabemichi thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT kimuratakahiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT suzukihidenori thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT ozawataijiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT hirakawahitoshi thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT fukudayujiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT hasegawayasuhisa thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT hanainobuhiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT sawabemichi highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT kimuratakahiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT suzukihidenori highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT ozawataijiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT hirakawahitoshi highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT fukudayujiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer
AT hasegawayasuhisa highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer