Cargando…
The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is sca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651931 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438 |
_version_ | 1783385054429315072 |
---|---|
author | Hanai, Nobuhiro Sawabe, Michi Kimura, Takahiro Suzuki, Hidenori Ozawa, Taijiro Hirakawa, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yujiro Hasegawa, Yasuhisa |
author_facet | Hanai, Nobuhiro Sawabe, Michi Kimura, Takahiro Suzuki, Hidenori Ozawa, Taijiro Hirakawa, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yujiro Hasegawa, Yasuhisa |
author_sort | Hanai, Nobuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the impact of the mGPS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) in 129 patients with HNC treated at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital from 2012-2013. The mGPS was calculated as follows: mGPS of 0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl; 1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl; 2, CRP>1.0 mg/dl and albumin <3.5 mg/dl. Regarding the HS-mGPS, the CRP threshold level was set as 0.3 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prognosis of HNC worsened significantly as both the mGPS and HS-mGPS increased in a univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the HS-mGPS was significantly associated with the OS (adjusted HR for HS-mGPS of 2 compared to an HS-mGPS of 0 [HR(score2-0)] 3.14 [95% CI: 1.23-8.07], P(trend) < 0.001), while the mGPS was suggested to be associated with the survival (HR(score2-0) 2.37 [95% CI:0.89-6.33], P(trend) = 0.145). Even after stratification by clinical covariates, these associations persisted. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the HS-mGPS is useful as an independent prognostic factor in HNC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6319335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63193352019-01-16 The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer Hanai, Nobuhiro Sawabe, Michi Kimura, Takahiro Suzuki, Hidenori Ozawa, Taijiro Hirakawa, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yujiro Hasegawa, Yasuhisa Oncotarget Research Paper BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the inflammatory indices of modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and high-sensitivity mGPS (HS-mGPS) play important roles in predicting the survival in many cancer; however, evidence supporting such an association in head and neck cancer (HNC) is scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the impact of the mGPS and HS-mGPS on the overall survival (OS) in 129 patients with HNC treated at Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital from 2012-2013. The mGPS was calculated as follows: mGPS of 0, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤1.0 mg/dl; 1, CRP >1.0 mg/dl; 2, CRP>1.0 mg/dl and albumin <3.5 mg/dl. Regarding the HS-mGPS, the CRP threshold level was set as 0.3 mg/dl. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: The prognosis of HNC worsened significantly as both the mGPS and HS-mGPS increased in a univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, the HS-mGPS was significantly associated with the OS (adjusted HR for HS-mGPS of 2 compared to an HS-mGPS of 0 [HR(score2-0)] 3.14 [95% CI: 1.23-8.07], P(trend) < 0.001), while the mGPS was suggested to be associated with the survival (HR(score2-0) 2.37 [95% CI:0.89-6.33], P(trend) = 0.145). Even after stratification by clinical covariates, these associations persisted. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the HS-mGPS is useful as an independent prognostic factor in HNC. Impact Journals LLC 2018-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6319335/ /pubmed/30651931 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Hanai et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hanai, Nobuhiro Sawabe, Michi Kimura, Takahiro Suzuki, Hidenori Ozawa, Taijiro Hirakawa, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yujiro Hasegawa, Yasuhisa The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title | The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title_full | The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title_fullStr | The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title_short | The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
title_sort | high-sensitivity modified glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6319335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30651931 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanainobuhiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT sawabemichi thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT kimuratakahiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT suzukihidenori thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT ozawataijiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT hirakawahitoshi thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT fukudayujiro thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT hasegawayasuhisa thehighsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT hanainobuhiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT sawabemichi highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT kimuratakahiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT suzukihidenori highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT ozawataijiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT hirakawahitoshi highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT fukudayujiro highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer AT hasegawayasuhisa highsensitivitymodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreissuperiortothemodifiedglasgowprognosticscoreasaprognosticpredictorforheadandneckcancer |